OK back to the dry problems
Have you tried another one just to rule that out?
If it's okay, then it's not acting "normal" at all.
Whenever it's important for you to run the dry shot ( I don't know, maybe that's all the time ), then I suppose you could just modify the section of your MAF table in the tune that applies when you are using the N2O.
A full diagnostic scan when your hitting the dry system could be helpful.
You could monitor your MAF output in particular.
If everything looks good on the scan, then that sort of points to other odd-ball type problems like your fuel pressure dropping or something like that.
Don't give up. You'll figure it out.

Robert
Cuz I heard that what it shows on the dyno is about 1 point richer than what it would be on the track, so maybe it's actually 12.1 to 11.4? I don't know if that's the case, can anyone verify for me if there actually is a 1 point difference on a dyno with a wideband and real world drag racing with a wideband?
Trending Topics
Have you tried another one just to rule that out?
If it's okay, then it's not acting "normal" at all.
Whenever it's important for you to run the dry shot ( I don't know, maybe that's all the time ), then I suppose you could just modify the section of your MAF table in the tune that applies when you are using the N2O.
A full diagnostic scan when your hitting the dry system could be helpful.
You could monitor your MAF output in particular.
If everything looks good on the scan, then that sort of points to other odd-ball type problems like your fuel pressure dropping or something like that.
Don't give up. You'll figure it out.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Robert
Is there anyone in Florida that knows how to tune a dry kit?
Cuz I heard that what it shows on the dyno is about 1 point richer than what it would be on the track, so maybe it's actually 12.1 to 11.4? I don't know if that's the case, can anyone verify for me if there actually is a 1 point difference on a dyno with a wideband and real world drag racing with a wideband?
Robert
No its pretty much the whole time but the longer you stay in it the leaner it gets well atleast i think so i dont like staying in it when it in the 13's and its a single 55 pill, when the car was first tuned it put down 188 to the wheels on a single 61 pill and would pull the 1/4 staying at 11.8-12.0 and then a few days later it wouldnt go 500ft and two tunes later still same problem.
Back to the fuel thing if you have good fuel pressure, your injector duty cycle is good then just increase the fuel PE table its not as complicated as its being made out to be
How can you not know if you have LTFT's or not?
Is this a speed density tune? or is it running in MAF-fail mode?
Not running through CATs are you?
If you have EFI-live then yes you can simply boost the fuel delivery in the PE vs RPM table. Test and see what happens.
You say your starting at 13.1 and ending at around 12.4. Compare the PE from where at 12.4 to the 13.1 and shift your multiplier tables, to start around 11.x and slightly lean out from max torque towards max hp rpm ( I am not saying lean it out, just get a little leaner, like 12.5 on track not dyno), and then richen it back up after peak hp til lshift/redline. I dont rely on the IAT mutiplier since my logs show quite a delay from the time dry nitrous enters the engine to the PCM seeing the temp drop. I have stuck with MAP/MAF areas and tune according to rpm vs airflow @ WOT. Agree'd spark pops plugs long before leaning out will, which it sounds like your richening up anyway, just not soon enough or rich enough. I would seriously look at your Fuel Trims if they are on, I would think the trims are not locking at 0. I had similar issue until the trims fell in-line.
Devon.....Dyno will read richer than track/street not leaner, so if his readings were on the Dyno he would be running somewhere around 13.8 at start to 13.2 near end on street, or vice versa if his wb was on the track then on a dyno he might be 12.4 start to 11.6 ending on a dyno. Unless he was using a loading dyno, then its not an issue. Using my LM-1 compared to a shop WB I seen no difference in readings. On the dyno I was at 12.5:1, on the street I was 13.3:1. That was NA. Same applies to Jucie. This was on a Dynojet, not sure model number but not a loading type.
I can only change the bias between the IAT and the CTS.
I agree the original problem didn't seem to be described accurately enough.
Listing out some results of the scanning and WBO2 log would be helpful.
Last edited by ChevPower; Mar 19, 2006 at 04:21 PM.
I've run 14.0 AFR on the bottle for 1/8 mile and no burning of the plugs.
I'm starting to think right now that your problem may be that the MAF still has the screen on it, in which case you were never in any danger.
Just simply get rid of the screen and problem solved.

