New wideband for the market.
Retail pricing on the NON data logging unit is 199.00 w/o sensor, and 248.75 with data logging. The 248.75 allow you to monitor rpm and has the analayis software package so you can review the data. These newer unit also allow the enduser to plug then into tuning software, HP etc. And it still can be mounted anywhere in/under the car if need be.
Here is the page from FJO site that talks about this new product.
WideBand Page
Download Page
Feel free to pm me or call if you have any questions. This is still new to me and learning what all it can do.
http://www.fjoracing.com/images/kwb4001_med.jpg
Ricky
Note: using a gauge that measures voltage requires that the grounds are connected to the same point otherwise the gauge may not accurately display the AFR. eg. for a linear 0~5v scale that corresponds to 10~20 AFR, a 1v change = 2AFR change. This means that if your gauge ground is off by 0.25v from the wideband ground point, you have introduced a 0.5AFR error. A 0.25v potential difference between 2 ground points on a car is not uncommon, especially when one is in the engine bay and the other is in the passenger compartment. The problem gets worse if you are trying to use a simulated narrowband range of 1~0v for 10~20 AFR. In this case a 0.20v offset results in a 1AFR error - making the reading all but useless. It is for this reason that FJO does not use a voltage (analog) gauge.
Ricky
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
http://www.fjoracing.com/products/WBAFR/
http://www.fjoracing.com/products/WBAFR/downloads.php
Ricky
Ricky
How come it seems like only the Innovate wideband sensors are very sensitive? I have never heard of watershock (condensation) or silicone-poisoning very to o2 sensors until now. My friends have the AEM
wideband, PLX, and the FJO widebands and they NEVER have to warm up their cars first then heat up the sensor so it doesn't crack from watershock. Having to buy $90.00 sensors is ridiculous. To me it sounds like these are cheap sensors that will go defective easily so Innovate makes money. o2 sensors are rugged for a reason, and condensation shouldn't affect anything or even silicon poisoning. Why does the sensor have to calibrate for air and heat? No other widebands have to do that? I was going to buy this wideband but now I am thinking twice after I read these forums how people always have erratic air/fuel readings and getting error codes on their lm-1
Answer:
The sensor is the same Bosch LSU4.2 unit used by everyone. It is a stock OEM part for Volkswagen, and others.
Quote:
I have never heard of watershock (condensation) or silicone-poisoning very to o2 sensors until now.
OEMs like VW are pretty good about placing the sensor in a spot that does not collect water. They may have blown a few sensors finding a good spot When you are welding on a bung from under a car, sometimes your options are limited.
They also know better than to let loose silicone get to the sensor. It does damage the sensors and change their output.
But .....
The analog based wideband meters (AEM, PLX, et al ) may not be able to detect a damaged sensor and just go on giving bad data. How would they know ??? Any meter that uses the standard Bosch WB controller chipset does not analyze the sensor in real-time. They just go by the factory calibration resistor that comes on the sensor.
Which gives rise to...
Quote:
Why does the sensor have to calibrate for air and heat? No other widebands have to do that?
No other widebands can do that. If you don't calibrate the system, you are relying on the calibration resistor on the sensor that was set to match the sensor output at the factory. The sensors change over time ( especially when run rich ); often as little as a 3 or 4 hours. And then, the calibration is off. But how will you know ???? It will still always be accurate right at 14.7AFR so you can't check it that way.... But now 13.0 is really 11.9 ? 12.3 is really 14.0 ? How will you check it ? In OEM applications the sensor is almost always run at 14.7AFR; so it does not drift nearly as quickly as on a tuner car running 12.0AFR or richer.
Every time you do a re-calibrate of a sensor on an LM-1, it adjusts for any changes in the sensor over time. As long as it's not damaged, it is accurate like a new sensor again. And, in the process, it can detect damaged sensors, etc.
I wonder what would happen if you put a sensor with a damaged ( but not open or shorted ) or just aged pump-cell on an AEM meter ? It can't analyze the pump resistance... so it would assume all is well and give bogus data thinking that the calibration resistor info is still valid ????
I don't really know the answer to that. Maybe I should do an experiment
But if it does, and it shows 12.5 when the real AFR is 14.1, at WOT... Bad things are going to happen. Could be game over.
I'd rather get an error code.






