Nitrous Oxide Installation | Tuning | Products
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Nitrous or Turbo
Nitrous
81
54.73%
Turbo
67
45.27%
Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll

Nitrous or Turbo

Old Apr 5, 2007 | 07:40 AM
  #1  
my01ws6's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Default Nitrous or Turbo

Just wondering which one you guys think is safer and easier on the block?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 09:23 AM
  #2  
N4cer's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
From: Ashland, KY
Default

Depends how hard you push it, and the safety devices you include.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #3  
transamfreak01's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Default

yeah a turbo set up can be worse than nitrous and vise versa depending on how it is set up. both can be safe and run for a long time if they are set up right.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 09:41 AM
  #4  
calie0's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Default

well turbos are $5000+ and nitrous systems are $500+. for a tenth of the price you can get about the same hp with N2O.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #5  
transamfreak01's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by calie0
well turbos are $5000+ and nitrous systems are $500+. for a tenth of the price you can get about the same hp with N2O.
lol this is going to start something... yeah it is but in time you will spend right around there and maybe more and with a turbo you dont have to worry about filling it back up when it runs out....
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #6  
nahasapeemapetalon's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 1
From: Grand Forks, North Dakota
Default

Turbo would be easier on your block/rotating assembly hp per hp.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #7  
N4cer's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 1
From: Ashland, KY
Default

You should probably post this in the FI forum also to see the answers there.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #8  
waterbug1999's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,282
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Default

Originally Posted by calie0
well turbos are $5000+ and nitrous systems are $500+. for a tenth of the price you can get about the same hp with N2O.
Way more then that by the time its all said and done...
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 01:18 AM
  #9  
transamfreak01's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by waterbug1999
Way more then that by the time its all said and done...

yes yes.... go nitrous i say
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 01:30 AM
  #10  
crazboy99's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 564
Likes: 1
From: Powder Springs, GA
Default

nitrous now...turbo later....thats what im doing....i may even keep the nitrous later on...gotta try them both before you can say one is better than the other
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 04:05 AM
  #11  
FL THRTL's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

^Boost + Spray = Nirvana?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #12  
SlowazzVette2's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

I was thinking why not get both. Its obvious you can afford them both or you wouldnt be asking. Bang for the buck is nitrous though IMO but thats just me.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #13  
Bandit LS1's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Groton, CT
Default

They're two totally different animals........decide what you want your car to do first and how much $$$ you want to spend.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2007 | 11:24 PM
  #14  
jamesSS's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: Sheboygan
Default

i say nitrous. cheaper up front, and you get power when you want.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 01:29 AM
  #15  
goatnipples2002's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Show your ***** run both...lol...don't be scurred

No really what do you want...a midnight monster, weekend warrior, a wash n' show car or a "look what I spent and will never go over 80mph" car?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #16  
383LQ4SS's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Port Richey
Default

Turbo can ultimately make more cylinder pressure safely. So if your going fo an all out combo and money is no object....go turbo.

But IMO if your goals are 500-750 rwhp on a typical forged LS1...nitrous all the way.

I just dont see the logic in spending 10K+ dollars on a turbo thats gonna make 500 rwhp. Or even 600 really.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 03:11 PM
  #17  
00Vette's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,576
Likes: 0
From: Southern Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by 383LQ4SS
Turbo can ultimately make more cylinder pressure safely. So if your going fo an all out combo and money is no object....go turbo.

But IMO if your goals are 500-750 rwhp on a typical forged LS1...nitrous all the way.

I just dont see the logic in spending 10K+ dollars on a turbo thats gonna make 500 rwhp. Or even 600 really.
You hit that on the head!! You couldn't have put it better IMO!
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #18  
Robert56's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma, WA
Default

Originally Posted by my01ws6
Just wondering which one you guys think is safer and easier on the block?
Well first lets consider which is the faster/quicker set-up, a 500rwhp turbo, or a 500rwhp nitrous (dry would be my choice ). It would certainly be the nitrous set-up. Why, because the nitrous torque will come on much quicker. It's really a double edge sword. So, straight up, probably the turbo would be easier on the lower end. However, there is a fix for this where the nitrous (dry of course) can be set-up to come much more progressively and actually mimick the turbo power/torque curves, as seen below in the over lay (thanks Chris Stewart). This can be done 3-different ways, the overlay is nozzle postion, then we have dual stage that breaks up the torque spike and finally the progressive controller. Progressive, imo, is the least desirable way to accomlish because of the wear/tear scenerio concerning beating the hell out of the noid(s).

A couple things on the graphs, my torque peak was actually a little over 500rwtq, and rwhp was about 480, so it was closer than the graph shows. Anyway, my set-up at that time was a 5177/dual staged and follows the curves of the turbo pretty well. Then look at Joe's all in one shot with a healthy intial torque spike, but falls off after that. So if we know what kind and at at what boost level a turbo is running we can tailor our set-up to be a little more agressive and take the win every time and still allow our stock block to live (it's that big low rpm torque spike that kills stock bottom ends) (ask me how my current stock block survived 665rwtq at 3800rpm ).




Robert
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #19  
W8N2SQZ's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Wow, sounds pretty bias in here Okay Ok J/K

I have owned both, so I will give you my opinion and the other side of the coin.

My first set-up was heads cam and a TNT 75 shot. This was years ago and with an AFR about 10 to 1 the car made 510 @ the tire. I love nitrous. My previous car was a 66 El camino. 475 big block, two stages, 300 on the first and 150 on the second. Never ran the second stage but it went 10 oh @ 138. Let me say agian, I love nitrous. On a good tune and the right bottle pressure, hang on for an instant kick in the pants.

Now,

I have stock truck heads, and a stock cam with a 76GTS and it made 515@ the tires with 8.5 pounds of boost. This thing in the cold of night pulls like a freight train. The car is soft spoken until you nail it. I love my turbo set up.

The reason I changed is because over the years I have spent enough money on nitrous bottle fills to pay for a majority of the turbo kit I now have.

With my turbo set-up, the power is ALWAYS there! I never worry about low bottle pressure when it is cold, and on the contrary, when it is cold my turbo setup makes the most power it can However, when it is hot, the heat soak from the turbo set-up hurts compared to the freezing cold temp drop from the unit.

Think both situtions out long and hard before you make a move. Don't let people sum up the expense of nitrous in 500 dollars and than try and tell you to make 500 you need 10K into a turbo set-up(not starting anything, just making a point). At 500 bucks you get the kit only, with out the other instruments to know what you FP is or what bottle pressure is and other things related to bottle use like a bottle heater. For example, if you are on the street one night and your opponent pulls up, unless you have spent the money on a bottle opener and spent the money on your bottle heater that has hepefully been on, you will have to get out of the car and crank the bottle open and hope you have good bottle pressure so you can use all the power you tuned for at that given bottle pressure. Where as, once the turbo set up is tuned, your ready.

I am sure we could spend hours comparing which is better in a given situation. I am giving you the other end of the spectrum because so far in this post you haven't heard it

Either way, you will be happy with either because you are adding power to you car I always figured I would have to build the motor no matter what, whether it was a turbo or spray. So I put the kit on the car and now I am building a low comp. motor for the turbo set-up and it will hopefully make more power than a built motor for nitrous on pump gas. My previous statement is specualtion at the moment, but I am going to see what happens.

Either way, mod your car and have fun!!!

Good luck,
Glenn
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2007 | 02:11 AM
  #20  
bad95killer's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere I Belong
Default

Originally Posted by Robert56
Well first lets consider which is the faster/quicker set-up, a 500rwhp turbo, or a 500rwhp nitrous (dry would be my choice ). It would certainly be the nitrous set-up. Why, because the nitrous torque will come on much quicker. It's really a double edge sword. So, straight up, probably the turbo would be easier on the lower end. However, there is a fix for this where the nitrous (dry of course) can be set-up to come much more progressively and actually mimick the turbo power/torque curves, as seen below in the over lay (thanks Chris Stewart). This can be done 3-different ways, the overlay is nozzle postion, then we have dual stage that breaks up the torque spike and finally the progressive controller. Progressive, imo, is the least desirable way to accomlish because of the wear/tear scenerio concerning beating the hell out of the noid(s).

A couple things on the graphs, my torque peak was actually a little over 500rwtq, and rwhp was about 480, so it was closer than the graph shows. Anyway, my set-up at that time was a 5177/dual staged and follows the curves of the turbo pretty well. Then look at Joe's all in one shot with a healthy intial torque spike, but falls off after that. So if we know what kind and at at what boost level a turbo is running we can tailor our set-up to be a little more agressive and take the win every time and still allow our stock block to live (it's that big low rpm torque spike that kills stock bottom ends) (ask me how my current stock block survived 665rwtq at 3800rpm ).




Robert
Well written Robert

peace
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.