600 Rwhp

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 14, 2008 | 02:00 PM

#21

bowtierodder

TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 329

Likes: 0

From: so. cal

i hit the numbers in my sig

Mar 14, 2008 | 02:00 PM

#22

BAKED

9 Second Club

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 1,601

Likes: 2

From: kentucky

It's all in the tune, with a good tune it will last longer than one might think. Just use common sence and don't get greedy.

I have a friend making 622 rwhp on his stock bottom end it's a C5 with a procharger, it's held together for a while now. He don't rape it all the time and he has one of the best tuners out there. Bluecat

Mar 14, 2008 | 07:44 PM

#23

bad6as

11 Second Club

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 4,796

Likes: 0

From: Maryland

rod bolts should go on the list

im only looking for 550 and im looking in to the rod bolts

Mar 14, 2008 | 10:09 PM

#24

rocksws6

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 552

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert56

[COLOR="Blue"]

Will do. The only thing I don't like about a dry shot is that you have to depend on the MAF to add fuel then you have to run bigger injectors. Don't really like the thoughts of that. I wasn't dissing the dry shot at all in my post which seems to be the way you and everybody else took it. I just wanted to know why he thought it was a better choice than wet.

Last edited by Robert56; Mar 28, 2008 at 10:39 PM. Reason: Remove my input

Mar 15, 2008 | 12:00 AM

#25

TwoFast4Lv

10 Second Club

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 10,023

Likes: 6

From: LT1 land...the "409" of the 90s!

how many times you going to hurt your engine while beating this stick Robert?

Mar 15, 2008 | 01:31 AM

#26

rocksws6

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 552

Likes: 0

After reading that whole dry vs. wet thread I would have to say that I have different POV on dry shots. Too bad I just ordered a wet kit but I think it will still serve my needs. I will just have to stay on top of my noid maintnance but I think I will be just fine. But dry seems to be a great option. If I had it to do over again I may have went that route. But I think I'm just going to stick with the Plate seeing as how I already bought it. Thanks for the info.
Edit: Why isn't that a sticky?

Last edited by Robert56; Mar 28, 2008 at 10:38 PM. Reason: remove my input

Mar 15, 2008 | 07:45 AM

#27

Hi Volume

TECH Regular

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 430

Likes: 0

From: NoCal

Quote:

Originally Posted by rocksws6

Edit: Why isn't that a sticky?

Because then EVERYONE with ls1's with at least 600rwhp will be roaming around

Mar 15, 2008 | 01:23 PM

#28

rocksws6

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 552

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hi Volume

Because then EVERYONE with ls1's with at least 600rwhp will be roaming around

I was talking about the wet vs. dry thread.

LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Verdad Gallardo

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Pouria Savadkouei

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Verdad Gallardo

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Pouria Savadkouei

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Verdad Gallardo

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Verdad Gallardo

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Verdad Gallardo

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Verdad Gallardo

Mar 15, 2008 | 01:27 PM

#29

rocksws6

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 552

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert56

The plate kits are great. You know you can make any plate kit into a dry hit if you use the HSW Interface, as it works for dry hits even after the MAF. Good luck and have fun.
Robert

Didn't know that. I will look into it. Thanks man.

Mar 28, 2008 | 03:14 PM

#30

Jpr5690

Thread Starter

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 3,806

Likes: 0

Thanks For The Crappy Comments .. Anyone Have Useful Information

Mar 28, 2008 | 03:55 PM

#31

Z284U2TRY

TECH Resident

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 885

Likes: 0

From: around

ran a 250 kick on directport set up on a stock block. Never took it to the dyno but my butometer told me 600 plus. tune was on 18 deg max tr7 plug with 116 sunoco feeding the directport.

Mar 28, 2008 | 10:43 PM

#32

Robert56

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Aug 2003

Posts: 9,557

Likes: 1

From: Tacoma, WA

Don't worry, you'll get no more input from me, period.
Robert

Mar 28, 2008 | 11:55 PM

#33

rocksws6

TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jun 2007

Posts: 552

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jpr5690

Thanks For The Crappy Comments .. Anyone Have Useful Information

Nice attitude you got there.

Mar 29, 2008 | 01:52 AM

#34

sleeperstyle

10 Second Club

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,284

Likes: 0

From: hatboro, pa

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowtierodder

i hit the numbers in my sig

that's crazy, considering i only hit ~500rwhp with basically the same setup (ms3). just went 10.3 @ 130mph

im curious because i think dyno #'s are complete bullshit and don't mean a thing. not to knock anybody's #'s im not saying they are fake or anything like that, but if it IS ALL RELATIVE then your car should go WELL into the 9's with 582rwhp through your drivetrain. what did it run/trap?

a goal of 600rwhp= an easy goal. the goal of running what a 600rwhp automatic car SHOULD RUN= difficult goal.

Mar 29, 2008 | 01:55 AM

#35

sleeperstyle

10 Second Club

iTrader: (4)

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 1,284

Likes: 0

From: hatboro, pa

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jpr5690

. Anyone Have Useful Information

go to a dyno that reads high, have them correct your hp #'s so one of the spikes hits 600rwhp- and your done!! viola you have a 600rwhp car

Mar 31, 2008 | 04:40 PM

#36

Jpr5690

Thread Starter

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 3,806

Likes: 0

Ok... Again I Seen It Mentioned Many Times But I Guess Those People Arnt Posting..

Who Has Actually Consistently Sprayed Their H\c Stock Block To 600 Rwhp And How Long Did It Last..

Im Not Really Intrested In Other Setups, Ideas Or Arguments... I Just Want To Talk To People Like Termin8tor Who With H\c Stockblocks Have Sprayed 200 Shots

Mar 31, 2008 | 04:42 PM

#37

Jpr5690

Thread Starter

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 3,806

Likes: 0

Botierodder, How Long Have You Had Your Setup How Ofter Do You Spray?

Mar 31, 2008 | 04:44 PM

#38

Jpr5690

Thread Starter

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 3,806

Likes: 0

My Current Setup Is In My Sig Im Using A Dry 150 Shot @ 4000 Rpms And 24 Deg Of Timeing (ie:-8 Deg From Na Tune) Also I Use 93 Octane My Halo Kit Keeps My Fueling In The 11.2-11.4 Range

Apr 8, 2008 | 09:09 PM

#39

Jpr5690

Thread Starter

TECH Junkie

iTrader: (13)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 3,806

Likes: 0

Zzzzzzzzzzzz............

Apr 9, 2008 | 11:55 AM

#40

Sprayed 99

10 Second Club

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Apr 2008

Posts: 419

Likes: 10

From: nj

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jpr5690

have over 50 hard passes and no problems yet. and that was with the car tuned for 10.5 compression which is now 11.5 for the last 30+ passes. gonna up the shot to 200 to 250 next time out after a tune and throw in a set of rod bolts for insurance. i figure if ya break go bigger

i've read a few posts about guys sprayin 250+ on stock bottom ends but how long they live is another story

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 3
Next
Last