Ok...lets have some discussion on head lifting, water pushing and studs etc etc
#22
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: somewhere sliding sideways
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Wasn't there some one who was having issues with their AFR heads lifting? IIRC they filled the water ports up then drilled a small hole in it to alieviate the problem?
#24
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Port Richey
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^^ exactly....the heads you guys have also have thicker decks than stock. This would seem to indicate its more of a head warp issue than a bolt stretch issue.
So it appears there are atleast two cases here that headbolts are are not a huge issue as long as you have good ARP head studs.
Stock tq to yeald headbolt could very well be another issue though.
And of course any 5 bolt config would help tremendously.
What about how and when the spray activates to help control spikes?
So it appears there are atleast two cases here that headbolts are are not a huge issue as long as you have good ARP head studs.
Stock tq to yeald headbolt could very well be another issue though.
And of course any 5 bolt config would help tremendously.
What about how and when the spray activates to help control spikes?
#27
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can't disagree, though it seems it may be both or either depending on, well not sure. I haven't lifted my stock ls6 heads @ 250/280 on the 346, nor on the 300 on the 408 with L19s? But still, I want to run some Dart heads because they are much meatier, and the chances are probably better of never having an issue if all bases are covered.
Robert
Robert
i dont think its the bolts as much as the head deforming with them stretching...reason why is most peopl switch tp thicker deck heads to help this problem...if what yall are sayin about bolts is true then the thicker deck wouldent help at all...the bolts would still stretch...so it has to be in the heads..not sayin the bolts arent adding to it though
#28
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In other words...and 6 inch piece of wire hanger is bent rather easily...a 2 inch piece of wire hanger is much harder to bend.
Robert
are you taking about "run on torque"? Basically the amount of force required to spin the bolt most of the threads engaged...but not tightened?
That is important when using bolts..and one great reason to use studs.
I have seen that a poorly cleaned block can have 5-10 ft/lbs of run on tq from the threads engaging before ANY clamp force is applied to the head. In that case...like you say...you need to find out your "run on" tq...and add that to the total tq. You need to do that for every hole. There can be as much as 10 ft/lbs difference from hole to hole.
Of course if you clean the block threads VERY well...run on tq should be VERY low and not be much of an issue. But things dont always turn out that perfect. So knowing that tidbit can help.
I always recomend studs to eliminate this issue completely.
Now....on the larger bolts. Why do the larger bolts help? Is it because the larger diameter bolt has larger cross section and resulting increase in stretch resistance? or could it be because the larger diameter hole also decreases the distance of the deck and head bolt holes. In other words...and 6 inch piece of wire hanger is bent rather easily...a 2 inch piece of wire hanger is much harder to bend.
Is the bolt stretching? or the head warping in the area between bolts? Is the aluminum deck between the bolts weaker than the bolts themsleves?
Typically the surface area of the hardware with a larger diameter bolt is also a larger diameter...the hardware is steel and "backs up" the aluminum. So even such things as larger diameter steel washers IMO can help....if it can be fitted.
IMO its a combo of increased resistance to bolt stretch with either L19 and/or large diameter bolts/washers reducing potential "flex distance" of the cylinder head deck.
What about deck thickness?
What about cylinder head material?
What about Tq management (since tq is a direct measure of cylinder pressure)?
That is important when using bolts..and one great reason to use studs.
I have seen that a poorly cleaned block can have 5-10 ft/lbs of run on tq from the threads engaging before ANY clamp force is applied to the head. In that case...like you say...you need to find out your "run on" tq...and add that to the total tq. You need to do that for every hole. There can be as much as 10 ft/lbs difference from hole to hole.
Of course if you clean the block threads VERY well...run on tq should be VERY low and not be much of an issue. But things dont always turn out that perfect. So knowing that tidbit can help.
I always recomend studs to eliminate this issue completely.
Now....on the larger bolts. Why do the larger bolts help? Is it because the larger diameter bolt has larger cross section and resulting increase in stretch resistance? or could it be because the larger diameter hole also decreases the distance of the deck and head bolt holes. In other words...and 6 inch piece of wire hanger is bent rather easily...a 2 inch piece of wire hanger is much harder to bend.
Is the bolt stretching? or the head warping in the area between bolts? Is the aluminum deck between the bolts weaker than the bolts themsleves?
Typically the surface area of the hardware with a larger diameter bolt is also a larger diameter...the hardware is steel and "backs up" the aluminum. So even such things as larger diameter steel washers IMO can help....if it can be fitted.
IMO its a combo of increased resistance to bolt stretch with either L19 and/or large diameter bolts/washers reducing potential "flex distance" of the cylinder head deck.
What about deck thickness?
What about cylinder head material?
What about Tq management (since tq is a direct measure of cylinder pressure)?
#29
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Same here. When ever anyone is taking them out I recommend studs.
Typically the surface area of the hardware with a larger diameter bolt is also a larger diameter...the hardware is steel and "backs up" the aluminum. So even such things as larger diameter steel washers IMO can help....if it can be fitted.
IMO its a combo of increased resistance to bolt stretch with either L19 and/or large diameter bolts/washers reducing potential "flex distance" of the cylinder head deck.
IMO its a combo of increased resistance to bolt stretch with either L19 and/or large diameter bolts/washers reducing potential "flex distance" of the cylinder head deck.
![](http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/724/noyzeesweldedafr225s2aw8.jpg)
#30
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Man you have some good insight on this issue. Something you pointed out is the fact that most run the alum blocks and thus get some distortion, whereas, the iron 408's are much more stable and the results should favor less lifting with iron blocks. What do you think? My 408 was built/guaranteed to handle 1000hp, I wonder if this is a safe aluminum number for the masses, as it seems that at least ATV and Shiz are at these levels. This is becoming a very interesting debate. By the way, nice info on the studs/bolts; I copied info to my notes for future reference, thanks.
Robert
Robert
Yes, It's completely possible and it's not limited to the heads. The block itself can physically flex also. That's one of the problems with larger studs. It increases the possibility of the deck flexing because you're removing material from the surface to install the studs.
Same here. When ever anyone is taking them out I recommend studs.
The aluminum deck is most certainly weaker than a bolt. The thing is the stress is extended over a larger surface than that of the bolt. In extreme applications the block and head decks can and will flex before the bolt has any problems.
That's one of the reasons O rings with receiver grooves help. They act as an additional area to resist flexing and help seal the gaskets
You have to order them from ARP. The thing is you have to time it right. If they are making a batch of them they are about $650-750 if I remember correctly. If they have to special order the material and make them for you they are $1200-1300.
That's the thing. I hate to sound like a Guess Who nutswinger, but that's what he always says, "You don't lift the heads if you don't detonate." He's hitting his with a 500 shot on a 4 bolt per head application. I'm not sure what he's doing for head studs.
Noyzee had a problem with his heads cracking due to not being rehardened after being welded on. The welding messes with the heat treatment. Pictures of what he did (top) versus a normal AFR head on the bottom:
![](http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/724/noyzeesweldedafr225s2aw8.jpg)
Same here. When ever anyone is taking them out I recommend studs.
The aluminum deck is most certainly weaker than a bolt. The thing is the stress is extended over a larger surface than that of the bolt. In extreme applications the block and head decks can and will flex before the bolt has any problems.
That's one of the reasons O rings with receiver grooves help. They act as an additional area to resist flexing and help seal the gaskets
You have to order them from ARP. The thing is you have to time it right. If they are making a batch of them they are about $650-750 if I remember correctly. If they have to special order the material and make them for you they are $1200-1300.
That's the thing. I hate to sound like a Guess Who nutswinger, but that's what he always says, "You don't lift the heads if you don't detonate." He's hitting his with a 500 shot on a 4 bolt per head application. I'm not sure what he's doing for head studs.
Noyzee had a problem with his heads cracking due to not being rehardened after being welded on. The welding messes with the heat treatment. Pictures of what he did (top) versus a normal AFR head on the bottom:
![](http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/724/noyzeesweldedafr225s2aw8.jpg)
#31
8 SEC SLOPPY SHOT!!!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: lombard,IL
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My thery is a bit diffrent.I belive it is in the block more than head studs or the heads.The ford guys have been on a four bolt system for some time and there is alot of nmra guys making big power and not pushing a drop.The head bolt spread is pretty dam close also, but there on a 1/2 stud also.I know of cars with 1/2 studs and copper pushing water on a iron block.I know the copper thing at this point in time is not the cure to stop from pushing water, Been there done that and i am going back to a standard gasket.I belive the problem is in the block, the deck is very thin and the bores are not siamese to lock them together.The cylinders at high cylinder pressures will just move or rattle around causing water to find its way.I really feel if you had a LSX block still in a four bolt setup i feel you will find pushing water a thing of the past at the 1000hp mark.But if you upgraded to a l19 or a 1/2 stud the limit will increase.I also like the 1/2 stud better than the l 19, only reason is the bigger nut will hold a better clamping force and higher torque without the nut threads stretching.The studs are of diffrent materal but the nuts are of the same materal causing the smaller nut to fail first.Also compresion has plays a roll in pushing water also, Im at almost 14.1 were some guys are not and are able to hit larger shots at the motor vs me at higher compression can't hit it as hard.Bottom line the 6.0 iron block was desined for a passenger car not a 1000hp beast.W2W had there big turbo car that made big power but the block was filled also.Just my .02
Mike
Mike
#33
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Man you have some good insight on this issue. Something you pointed out is the fact that most run the alum blocks and thus get some distortion, whereas, the iron 408's are much more stable and the results should favor less lifting with iron blocks. What do you think? My 408 was built/guaranteed to handle 1000hp, I wonder if this is a safe aluminum number for the masses, as it seems that at least ATV and Shiz are at these levels. This is becoming a very interesting debate. By the way, nice info on the studs/bolts; I copied info to my notes for future reference, thanks.
Robert
Robert
You have to take into some of the things Tuff mentions right below your post. You have to look at everything setup in the engine. Yes, the iron blocks are more stable and forgiving with cylinder pressure, distortion, and controlling potential problems. The thing is though that if you have a built 408 with stock castings on them that is going to be the weak point. Your head decks are going to flex and your not going to be able to hit it as hard. Compression and how you're spraying your engine come into effect too. Much like your thread with the individual cylinder tuning. Every little thing comes into acount.
One problem though is that there's only so much we really can do. The lack of a siamesed bore is one thing that hurts us. The other is when your building an all out setup. You have to make a happy medium with large power adder cars. All of our blocks have the same bore spacing so there's no fixing that problem. Ideally you want to make as much power as you can off the bottle and then hit it with as much as it will take. The problem with that is ideally making more power on motor means more cubes. That means you're either having a larger stroke that pushes the pins further up in the pistons reducing compression height or you have a large bore that reduces cylinder wall thickness and allows more flex. On the flip side of the equation if you want and engine that'll take the largest hit you can hit it with is not going to make as much on motor alone. Either way you look at it 1+1=2.
The LSX block coming out is huge though for those looking to truely push the limits. The extra head bolts are huge and the extra material really helps with stability. When the tall deck version comes out we'll really be seeing some crazy combos. The problem in lies that not everyone has the capabilities or money to take every variable into account. There are some small things that do work though. Such as cleaning the block properly like 383 mentioned.
One thing that I plan on utilizing in my setup is Yamabond. I know it's been covered a few times before, but it's a liquid adhesive. Yamaha uses it on many of their applications instead of gaskets. It's super sticky. In extreme instances it allows the heads to actually lift without loosing coolant. Everyones done this when they were a kid so think of sticking glue between your hands and pushing them shut. Then, try to pull them apart. Certain areas are still sticking together and harder to pull apart. If you have that on a surface where its completely flat and allow the glue to dry it's going to be very difficult to remove. It's just an extra step that'll help out. Eastside has an old article in GMHTP about using it and it solving their problems.
My thery is a bit diffrent.I belive it is in the block more than head studs or the heads.The ford guys have been on a four bolt system for some time and there is alot of nmra guys making big power and not pushing a drop.The head bolt spread is pretty dam close also, but there on a 1/2 stud also.I know of cars with 1/2 studs and copper pushing water on a iron block.I know the copper thing at this point in time is not the cure to stop from pushing water, Been there done that and i am going back to a standard gasket.I belive the problem is in the block, the deck is very thin and the bores are not siamese to lock them together.The cylinders at high cylinder pressures will just move or rattle around causing water to find its way.I really feel if you had a LSX block still in a four bolt setup i feel you will find pushing water a thing of the past at the 1000hp mark.But if you upgraded to a l19 or a 1/2 stud the limit will increase.I also like the 1/2 stud better than the l 19, only reason is the bigger nut will hold a better clamping force and higher torque without the nut threads stretching.The studs are of diffrent materal but the nuts are of the same materal causing the smaller nut to fail first.Also compresion has plays a roll in pushing water also, Im at almost 14.1 were some guys are not and are able to hit larger shots at the motor vs me at higher compression can't hit it as hard.Bottom line the 6.0 iron block was desined for a passenger car not a 1000hp beast.W2W had there big turbo car that made big power but the block was filled also.Just my .02
Mike
Mike
You bring up an interesting idea though with the nuts. I've never considered that. You could probably counteract that by having ARP make your studs and nuts both a little taller. That would allow the nuts to grab onto some extra threads and hopefully grasp a little better.
Block fill is certainly a viable option. A lot of street guys don't like it that much though. It's proven to work though. When my LT1 car gets a forged engine it will most certainly be half filled.
Eventually though you'll hit a point where you are truely pushing the limits. Look at some of the fast drag radial turbo cars. I know almost all of them pushed water when they were using 4 bolt per head setups. The thing is trying to use some sense and take every possible angle into account.
#34
8 SEC SLOPPY SHOT!!!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: lombard,IL
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you have enough space for water to leak yamabond will not hold thousands of pounds of cylinder pressure.The market is still green and people need to change to a real block (LSX or WARHAWK) that will cure alot of problems.
#35
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Anyway, i was trying to remember who I stole Nitrous Huffer from, and now I see, thanks. they really look nice with my DP Dry and Vic Jr...
Robert
![](http://www.robertsnitrousservice.com/Bar%20pics%20and%20fuelsystem%20pics%20004.jpg)
#39
8 SEC SLOPPY SHOT!!!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: lombard,IL
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree that alot of people are not going to have a couple grand laying around for a new block but all im saying is that if people want to take advantage of big hp then the aftermarket blocks will have to fit the budget if you don't like running motors like a steam engine.Like ive said before the four bolt stuff i belive will work just scrap the the stock blocks.I have a new motor this year and it is a six bolt setup because i started from scratch.Just like we all have bought stuff and out grew it because we wanted to go faster,It will be the same thing with block to.Pusting water is not a fun thing and trying to contain it from getting under your tires at 150mph can make for a disaster of a pass.So depends on how you look at the cost of the block.I know im at the limit just for the simple fact that i run high compression and there is no way to contain the water due to high cylinder pressure.
#40
8 SEC SLOPPY SHOT!!!
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: lombard,IL
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey, tuff, good input, however, the guys like myself with lower compression, the iron block is bound to be a benefit wouldn't you say?
Anyway, i was trying to remember who I stole Nitrous Huffer from, and now I see, thanks. they really look nice with my DP Dry and Vic Jr...
Robert
![](http://www.robertsnitrousservice.com/Bar%20pics%20and%20fuelsystem%20pics%20004.jpg)
Anyway, i was trying to remember who I stole Nitrous Huffer from, and now I see, thanks. they really look nice with my DP Dry and Vic Jr...
Robert
![](http://www.robertsnitrousservice.com/Bar%20pics%20and%20fuelsystem%20pics%20004.jpg)
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)