camscam02

iTrader: (21)

50-100 is the norm based on starting bottle pressure. May not be crazy but it will make a difference.

A3VETTE

iTrader: (2)

What about with 2 bottles feeding one kit (200-300 shot)?

I barely see a pressure drop as it is but I just want the nano to elimitate the heaters and the strain they put on my electrical system and to get a few more passes out of the bottles. I get about 8 good passes as it is now. 10 would be nicer.

JRracing

iTrader: (35)

I am going to give the nano setup a shot this year. I do not want to run a heater. I have a very small battery and I know the heater will kill it. Plus I like the fact of turning them on and ready to go.

fuel

iTrader: (13)

i realy like mine

Firehawk441

iTrader: (41)

I adjust fuel pressure accordingly.

jetblast

Jeff Prock was interviewed in the "engine masters" mag. and said, that the nano/push sys. make a jet seem bigger, so yes, tuning is a must. he does not seem to be a proponent of nano. personally, i think is a plus to not have to heat the bottle via the heater which lowers the battery voltage and strains the alternator , encreasing accessory drive strain robbing some hp, especially on efi sys. the noids alone suck a lot of juice to add to the strain. if you heat the bottle [ torch or heater} to generate press. some of the liquid is used up whereas the nano the press is generated by an outside energy source that remains constant for that track day. hell you could even just pressurize the o2 bottle with the nano, disconnect it leave it at the trailer and make a very consistent run. people need to read the mag. article, is very informative.