Northwest Members WA, OR, ID, MT, WY, SD, ND

366 cu in vs 370

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-2006 | 06:03 PM
  #21  
93TAWicked1's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,525
Likes: 1
From: Portlan, OR
Default

Originally Posted by 99blancoSS
But with the valves reliefs I can do something different dont ya think
Yep you made your point and you should go bigger, I really don't want to debate it but the f13 would make more power up top and for the kind of driving you are talking about would be the smallest I'd personally go. But that is just me and I know you have a personal vendeta against that cam. But its a good off the shelf cam, my old ws6 made 430rwhp with a similar cam with home ported heads with stock valves, stock compression and mail order tuning.....

I might sell my MTI Z1 cam this fall
Old 09-05-2006 | 06:40 PM
  #22  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

Toms knows of a few good cams as well but he's like why? I like my torque band right now but I'm gonna spin a little higher so I'd like the hp to climb a little further. There are other cams besides the fm13 (which has never really impressed me) I know a lot of people love it and I'm not dissing anyones car. Just having fun with Bobby. Maybe and LG cam or LPE? I'll be looking closely but its just more money to spend when I dont really need to.
Old 09-05-2006 | 10:56 PM
  #23  
99blancoSS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,892
Likes: 3
From: ST Helens, OR
Default

Hey Bobby guess wich cam I'm gonna give a serious look.... g5x3 Might as well make a few changes while I'm at it. If I dont loose to much bottom end I'll do it.



Quick Reply: 366 cu in vs 370



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 AM.