A/F ratio question
Question is: Is the A/F safe to run like that? I can't hear any knock or pinging. Would the car make more power if the car ran a little richer? Also, where can I get another stock MAF screen to put back in?
Thanks in advance,
Dale
Personally, I'd drop that back to about 13:1 on the dyno.
Check out this site and the PCM Diagnostics forum on this board for more PCM related issues and tuning
www.ls1tuning.com
those tailpipe widebands are not terribly good since most of the widebands require AIR to accurately dial in the nernst cell. If you shove a wideband up the tailpipe its hard to get a fresh reference air (no gas) unless its something special. I'd always spend the $20 and have a special bung welded in for the wideband.
The whole point of the ion air pump is to reference pure air (no exhaust) to get an accurate reading.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I would think you are probably on the lean side also - if that is were it made best power then I would add add in 2-3% fuel to account for the loading differences - if you still want to be right on the edge. Personally I would try and keep it at 13.2:1 or richer on the street, just for the sake of safety/longevity. As with all things there isn't really any "magical number", it's just a tradeoff between power and safety.
I would think you are probably on the lean side also - if that is were it made best power then I would add add in 2-3% fuel to account for the loading differences - if you still want to be right on the edge. Personally I would try and keep it at 13.2:1 or richer on the street, just for the sake of safety/longevity. As with all things there isn't really any "magical number", it's just a tradeoff between power and safety.
joel
joel
The dynojets here that i go to weld a bunghole (lol) in and plug directly in. They do not use the tailpipe. EGT's affect air fuel ratio, thus by the time you get to the tailpipe, its possible to skew the results.
Dyno's cant really simulate real world events unless they have a 100mph windtunnel. Things like RAM AIR and wind resistance and weight are simply not perfectly replicable on a dyno. Hence the need for widebands
that are portable.Most of the good tuners can afford a baseline $325 (wholesale) to nice (700+ - fjo) portable wideband. Sure you can do WOT under fixed conditions, but you still need to bust the laptop out to do the part throttle tuning.
I've logged o2 sensors versus widebands, and o2 sensors are FAR slower in change, and greatly effected by EGT as well. Some knock (or if you boost/n2o) can throw the regular narrowband way off course.
Most dynojet's use bosch sensors which are slower than then NTK honda ones. However the NTK is more sensitive to exhaust pulses.
I'd guess Mr FJO user above has seen a much more "wavey" result with more samplepoints than a typical bosch lsu dynojet wideband output produces. They use "smoothing" almost always which is purty, but what the heck does that do for ya on tuning.
luckily the ecu for these ls1's is pretty advanced, to make up for gross mistakes some tuners could make.
joel
Is there a reason you are running in open loop also? I got tired of fighting the ECU's fuel trim.
joel


