Anyone else get bad results w/ idle scan?
07-28-2014, 09:33 PM
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan (Macomb or Lansing)
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone else get bad results w/ idle scan? I feel like i have been chasing my tail.
I can get my fueling spot on and then i usually do a cold start idle scan to get the RAF table and then instead of dialing in the idle, it always wants to stall.
I finally wised up and just decided to leave the RAF table as is, its like 2 units higher in every cell. The car really runs better. Does anyone have any similar experience?
I can get my fueling spot on and then i usually do a cold start idle scan to get the RAF table and then instead of dialing in the idle, it always wants to stall.
I finally wised up and just decided to leave the RAF table as is, its like 2 units higher in every cell. The car really runs better. Does anyone have any similar experience?
07-29-2014, 11:18 AM
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
I have come to prefer biasing the RAF tables bigher than
what's "necessary" and letting the idle RPM loop pull it in.
An extra helping of "will to live", like. If it's going to guess
wrong, make the wrong guess a beneficial one.
what's "necessary" and letting the idle RPM loop pull it in.
An extra helping of "will to live", like. If it's going to guess
wrong, make the wrong guess a beneficial one.
