how would you map your timing table
just wondering how would you map your timing table on the street or before dyno,
from which rpm would you target 24 or 28 from 3000rpm and above or maybe lower like 2000rpm and how much timing would you run for low rpm and this is my main question as we cant use timing for below 1500rpm or even 2000rpm how much do you guys run below 2000rpm
the way i think about it is
from 0-1000 5 degree
interpolate in between
1600rpm 16 degree
1800rpm 18degree
2000 rpm 20 degree
interpolate in between
from 2800or3000 24 or 28
and for cruising are do you feel the engine like 10 degree or 15 degree more on lower load, like if the wot is 24 would the cruise be 39 as in 15 degree more, or how would you build your map i have seen a tuner only target 31 and the car had awful fuel economy
i know every engine is different but it seems that the ls in general are very similar in timing map if not optimized properly as most tuner choose one number like 28 from any rpm at wot leave it flat as long as there is no detonation and near mbt
If you have messed with compression, as in decked your heads, stroked the engine, or you're running a cam, then you will definitely have to visit your timing table, but most likely to DECREASE timing in many areas. More compression = less timing. For instance, my 427 stroker doesn't make gains on anything beyond 24* on WOT, however in the midrange I am near 30*. The general shape of the table will see the most timing through the mid ranges, then fall off and plateau above 4k rpm typically. There should be a "ridgeline" right through the low to mid range, with two plateaus on either side under it. Idle is whatever the engine likes at idle, and isn't that important so long as you can get the idle RPM down to a reasonable level in the 600-800 range.
Big cams also hate lots of timing in the low end, like 2k - 3.5k, and it often will cause surging and bucking. Pulling timing will correct this.
Detonation isn't something that will immediately destroy your engine, so long as the fueling is on the safe side. Make sure you're running on the rich end of the spectrum to avoid the engine ending threat of a pre-ignition. That's why it's generally safe to start with a stock table, add 15 to 20% fuel across the entire VE table, and work your way up slowly, as in don't just go WOT on the first few drives. If you see detonation (KR), stop, correct it, then carry on. If you don't have any, it's not something you want to go looking for either, especially at WOT.
Under "user maths" pick an open slot and do this:
1. Select "new variable" and then either the generic MPH PID or your specific vehicle one.
2. Under the "Edit PID", select "Average" and under "period" write in -1000 (it will only let you type -100, but you can add another "0" after you have it on the formula area.
3. Add a " - " symbol
4. Repeat step 1 to add in second reference frame (same MPH PID again)
5. Select "Average" for second PID and under "period" write in 1000
6. Use 3 decimal places
7. Select MPH as units.
8. Name it something awesome like "Scare factor" or something.
If you use MPH under Generic Sensors, then it should look something like this:
([50020.114.avg(-1000)]) - ([50020.114.avg(1000)])
Note: 50020.114 = Generic MPH PID on mine, individual results may vary.
Another Note: for all PID's and units make sure you are using MPH. The PID's will normally populate with m/s which is meters/second. Should be good to go after that.
Now you can log this and put it on a graph to monitor gains and so forth. Also helps determine drivability.
Under "user maths" pick an open slot and do this:
1. Select "new variable" and then either the generic MPH PID or your specific vehicle one.
2. Under the "Edit PID", select "Average" and under "period" write in -1000 (it will only let you type -100, but you can add another "0" after you have it on the formula area.
3. Add a " - " symbol
4. Repeat step 1 to add in second reference frame (same MPH PID again)
5. Select "Average" for second PID and under "period" write in 1000
6. Use 3 decimal places
7. Select MPH as units.
8. Name it something awesome like "Scare factor" or something.
If you use MPH under Generic Sensors, then it should look something like this:
([50020.114.avg(-1000)]) - ([50020.114.avg(1000)])
Note: 50020.114 = Generic MPH PID on mine, individual results may vary.
Another Note: for all PID's and units make sure you are using MPH. The PID's will normally populate with m/s which is meters/second. Should be good to go after that.
Now you can log this and put it on a graph to monitor gains and so forth. Also helps determine drivability.
on a stock tune let say it target -18 degree under 800 rpm and -10 under 1200rpm, with a tune like this one im not gonna bother adding two degree at a time im asking what is the starting point can i target 5 degree or maybe 10 degree from 800rpm wot
let leave the afr out of the equation as i dont believe it will effect mbt but it would effect detonation and detonation is something i would look for after getting on the street not when building base map
thanks
How far are you from stock?
What is your goal with a base map of your timing table?
Are you adjusting the High Octane/low Octane tables or are you messing with the MBT table? <<<< NEVER mess with the MBT table.
I understand your concerns and I think I know what you are asking, but really, stock table is going to be a decent start. Even if it knocks, it's not a big deal so long as you're not going WOT right off the bat. Knock under WOT and knock while cruising or decel are two very different things. Depending on your compression and parts, 24* is a safe place to set your WOT timing in most cases, then push a degree or two monitoring gains as explained above. A dyno is honestly the best way, but if you just want to get it decent and close, then the methods above work too.
Also, -18 or -10, if you're talking about retarding the timing from zero or from 24, which I'm failing to understand, are not numbers you set that way. You set idle timing based on cam size, and what the engine likes. There are whole write-ups on idle tuning, and how to set this up. 18* might work for some, 14* for others, and 22* for others. Depends on setup and cam, and how low you want your idle to be. Mine idles at 800, stock is around 600. I cannot get it lower without many issues due to the cam size... 244/252 .634/.634 114+3 LSA < and I'm running 16* at idle. I'm also at 12:1, with a 427 stroked LS3, with all the goodies on top. My setup isn't terribly far off from the stock timing table really, shape wise.
I will try and post a pic later on what it should generally look like.
But basically, there is no clear standard on how to just set timing across the board. Like I said, no cookie cutters, and what works for one may not work for another because it is such a complicated subject.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
*Disclaimer* These depictions are GENERAL in nature, so please don't try and sharpshoot it, unless you have something to add that's constructive. I didn't go into a log and plot this stuff so I realize that it may be very inaccurate cell to cell. However, it gives the general idea and shape of the table and should help some folks understand it a little better. This is set up for a 427 Stroker with 12:1 SCR, 8.2:1 DCR. This is after many successful runs/miles (thousands) without issue, and not fully optimized. Sure I might be able to squeeze a pony or two out of a few spots, but not worth it IMO.
In all honesty, my bottom row is actually the WOT area after about 3200 RPM, due to injector size, airflow and all that stuff. If I wanted to actually use the rest of the area, I could scale the tune down and do it that way. Also not worth the extra effort IMO.
Hope this helps. Also adding a few decimal points allows for a nice smooth table, as you see.
and yeah we're pretty much working with the bottom two rows for timing once the computer recognizes the engine is at max g/cyl
and yeah we're pretty much working with the bottom two rows for timing once the computer recognizes the engine is at max g/cyl
I appreciate the compliment. Thanks. Feel free to borrow it, that's why it's here.
If not, does bumping up the numbers on the last couple of rows work? I mean like going to rows 128 and 129 and increasing them from 1.16 and 1.20 to something like 1.3 and 1.5? I'm running no more than 7psi at the very most so it seems 1.5 should be more than enough.
Thanks for the advice!
Jim
If not, does bumping up the numbers on the last couple of rows work? I mean like going to rows 128 and 129 and increasing them from 1.16 and 1.20 to something like 1.3 and 1.5? I'm running no more than 7psi at the very most so it seems 1.5 should be more than enough.
Thanks for the advice!
Jim







