Does the Fuel You Choose Matter? (Engine Masters)
Related! Not sure when the new one comes out, but the latest episode is all about Rec port vs Cathedral port. Nothing super groundbreaking for anyone who reads this site a lot, but still cool to see.
N/A give me 110 octane I'll add degrees of timing and profit... no... profit.. why?
I don't understand how 29* degrees of timing was optimal with the low octane vs high octane
From a Fuel engineer,,,, Lower octane fuel ignites to a peak temp faster than high octane fuel, the both release the same BTU of energy per lb, its just the speed it can release it. Chage density on a low CR motor falls off faster with 93-100 octane than 114 octane in a High CR motor.
Example,, I used to drag race a Mazda Rx3 Rotary,, when normally aspirated you can't make one knock( < 8:1 CR stock) . We found a source for 65 octane fuel, bought us 30 HP on a really WELL modified motor, at 12K rpm..... (Tip don't try that RPM at home. it takes a TON of work to get there... ) Stock rotaries damage themselves starting just above about 7800 rpm despite all the myth and legend..
Biggest killer of rotary engines was leaded premium back in the 70's the lead coated the apex seals and ruined them.On the other hand a Cosworth Twin cam midget I used to take care of had 15.5 to 1 compression and it got pissed with anything less than 100% methanol. (even happier if some Nitro-methane "spilled" in to it..
) 10K rpm on a 1/8 track. The Piston to head clearance on that motor is scary.Its all about the build and the fuel. Without 1 the other may or may not give an advantage. I used to see a lot of idiots burn up stock street motors trying to run Nitro.. Convinced they would get 100Giga Horsepower from it.
The burn rate of a fuel isn't much related to octane. There's a very slight effect there, but you would never be able to tell the difference in a timing curve over a 30 octane spread. The content of the fuel is the big factor, when looking at just the fuel itself. Sunoco SR18, for example, has a faster burn rate than 87 pump gas. If you want to get a ballpark of the burn rate, look at the fuel's specific gravity, RVP, and distillation. In most cases (some exceptions apply), a lighter fuel with higher vapor and lower boiling point will tend to have a faster burn rate.
That said, the chamber shape, turbulence, temperature, and pressure have far higher effects on the burn rate than the fuel itself. That's why you don't see a difference in timing across the fuels in that episode. The engine wants what the engine wants. The fuel can be a factor though if it's not able to be burned efficiently due to the chamber variables. Toluene, for example, has a high boiling point, is rather dense, and has poor RVP which makes it difficult to vaporize and burn efficiently. This can hurt power in an NA engine that doesn't have the heat and cylinder pressure to vaporize it and burn it, but great for a boosted engine looking to open up the tuning window. In the EM episode, the E85 and methanol are both restricted in what they can do because of the engine chosen. They both have a slower burn rate than pump gas. The pump gas was already burning slower than the chamber will accommodate so the other two fuels don't fare any better. The power bump comes from the cooling effect of the alcohol, which was also restricted by the air not being that hot to begin with. The E85 was able to cool the air about as much as could be done so the methanol wasn't going to improve on that, hence the power numbers between them were about the same. Compare those two fuels in a 14:1 engine, it's a different story.
The oil has a factor in this too. (You should expect an oil note from me by this point.) Any oil that gets past the rings, clung to the cylinder walls, can effect the octane and burn rate. There's power to be found here as well.
Last edited by Polyalphaolefin; Apr 17, 2022 at 09:14 AM.
Trending Topics
The burn rate of a fuel isn't much related to octane. There's a very slight effect there, but you would never be able to tell the difference in a timing curve over a 30 octane spread. The content of the fuel is the big factor, when looking at just the fuel itself. Sunoco SR18, for example, has a faster burn rate than 87 pump gas. If you want to get a ballpark of the burn rate, look at the fuel's specific gravity, RVP, and distillation. In most cases (some exceptions apply), a lighter fuel with higher vapor and lower boiling point will tend to have a faster burn rate.
That said, the chamber shape, turbulence, temperature, and pressure have far higher effects on the burn rate than the fuel itself. That's why you don't see a difference in timing across the fuels in that episode. The engine wants what the engine wants. The fuel can be a factor though if it's not able to be burned efficiently due to the chamber variables. Toluene, for example, has a high boiling point, is rather dense, and has poor RVP which makes it difficult to vaporize and burn efficiently. This can hurt power in an NA engine that doesn't have the heat and cylinder pressure to vaporize it and burn it, but great for a boosted engine looking to open up the tuning window. In the EM episode, the E85 and methanol are both restricted in what they can do because of the engine chosen. They both have a slower burn rate than pump gas. The pump gas was already burning slower than the chamber will accommodate so the other two fuels don't fare any better. The power bump comes from the cooling effect of the alcohol, which was also restricted by the air not being that hot to begin with. The E85 was able to cool the air about as much as could be done so the methanol wasn't going to improve on that, hence the power numbers between them were about the same. Compare those two fuels in a 14:1 engine, it's a different story.
The oil has a factor in this too. (You should expect an oil note from me by this point.) Any oil that gets past the rings, clung to the cylinder walls, can effect the octane and burn rate. There's power to be found here as well.
I enjoy the EM show, but I find it’s (mostly) more entry level testing of stuff that’s common sense related in this industry. Nothing cutting edge to be found there.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I had an uncle that drove and worked on drag cars in 60's and then turned his talents to dirt cars, No matter what team he was working for they always seen a huge improvement in their programs. His success was in knowing how to make everything work together on the car and that included the driver. I couldn't tell you how many times car owners and drivers were pissed because he made a bunch of changes without telling them, He did some things that most people would say was not going to work or *** backwards. In the end they had to admit what he was doing got them wins and championships.
The bashed headers episode didn't have much effect because the headers weren't having much effect to begin with. The intake and cam used didn't pair really well with the headers used so you had this conflict of wave tuning that didn't allow the headers to scavenge as well as they could. Combine that with headers likely a little oversized to begin with, it's not being very demanding. That same engine with tuned intake runner and header lengths and a custom cam would likely be a different story. However, I understand why they didn't do that. They wanted to replicate what >90% of combos are on the street which is common (non-matched) parts from a catalog with headers designed around engine bay fitment over wave tuning.
My favorite episode will always be the air filter shootout with the salad bowl.
I like your posts, They are always informative and to the point.







