Term X Tune
LQ4 block stroked to 408
Wiesco -3cc for 11.5:1 cr (9.14 dynamic)
.023, .025 ring gap for possible spray later
PCR 237 heads (66 cc)
Cam Motion Spec Cam - 242/250 .628/.611 lift 114+4 110cl
Fast 102 intake with 102tb
Deka 52lb inj run at 58psi for 61lb delivery
Walbro 450 pump
The VE is conservative (fat), but will clean up fairly quickly. Up top, that #, will be partially determined by the fuel injectors setup, and how accurate or inaccurate that is, as well as how efficient the actual fuel system is. It should never see 107 N/A, but again, with the injectors setup like that, I see nothing wrong with starting there.
I don't know what you base timing is set at, but your up top timing is more than conservative to start with.
The VE is conservative (fat), but will clean up fairly quickly. Up top, that #, will be partially determined by the fuel injectors setup, and how accurate or inaccurate that is, as well as how efficient the actual fuel system is. It should never see 107 N/A, but again, with the injectors setup like that, I see nothing wrong with starting there.
I don't know what you base timing is set at, but your up top timing is more than conservative to start with.
With a cam that big, the 02 sensor is going to be pretty much worthless at idle. The learn table is going to be jacked.
I'm guessing it's going to idle in the 70kpa range, I think that's around 7 inches of vacuum.
The VE is way to high for where it's going to be idling at. Like 40% high, IMO anyway.
With a cam that big, the 02 sensor is going to be pretty much worthless at idle. The learn table is going to be jacked.
I'm guessing it's going to idle in the 70kpa range, I think that's around 7 inches of vacuum.
The VE is way to high for where it's going to be idling at. Like 40% high, IMO anyway.
Trending Topics
Fuel stink wasn't noticeable unless I stood behind the car, and I haven't done that since the EOIT changes, but I given how much better it idles I suspect that's gotten better too.
Definitely give it a try.
It cost about 30whp at the top end, so ideally you'd only use the retarded EOIT at low RPM, or low MAF, or low throttle... and use a normal EOIT otherwise. Hopefully your standalone allows for that.
For other stock-PCM folks, I am working on a modified version of the 7603 operating system that allows separate EOIT tables for high-MAF and low-MAF. It's working in my car and I hope to be ready to share it with others in the not-too-distant future.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Fuel stink wasn't noticeable unless I stood behind the car, and I haven't done that since the EOIT changes, but I given how much better it idles I suspect that's gotten better too.
Definitely give it a try.
It cost about 30whp at the top end, so ideally you'd only use the retarded EOIT at low RPM, or low MAF, or low throttle... and use a normal EOIT otherwise. Hopefully your standalone allows for that.
For other stock-PCM folks, I am working on a modified version of the 7603 operating system that allows separate EOIT tables for high-MAF and low-MAF. It's working in my car and I hope to be ready to share it with others in the not-too-distant future.
I didn't experiment much with the EOIT, just bumped the value from 5.55 (stock) to 6.5 and got better results, so left it here. Power went from 520whp to 550whp when I switched back to stock EOIT, but should really be around 600whp so there's still something else going on.
I'm pretty sure now that the power issue stems from fuel contamination, so maybe the real reason is just that he more of the contamination is in the filter now and less of it is circulating. Will find out more after the holidays.










