IFR table for 28# injectors
IFR table for 28# injectors Who has stock IFR table values for either 98 or 01-02 cars that came with 28.8# injectors? I searched and found one person that listed theirs for an 01 but they were a lot smaller than my table values for 26.6# injectors (I'd expect them to be larger not smaller). I'm scaling my table for changing to the 28's, so I want to see how the scaled values compare to tables where the 28's came stock.
the #s will come out nearly exact with a couple hundreths being off. There are variance patterns b/w the 99-00 and 01-02 IFR tables for each respective cell, but in the grand scope of things it won't make a lick of difference... If you want a techinical breakdown of it all then PM me
OK well still would like to see the IFR numbers from a 98. From an older post I found one number: 28.89 @ 50 MAP (unfortunately they didn't post the whole table) - this is lower than my scaled value, which is (28.8/26.6)*28.024 = 30.342. So, at 50 MAP my IFR table will show higher fuel rate than a 98 IFR table, for the same injector, so mine will run leaner right? This doesn't seem right, I think they should be the same value.
Originally Posted by patSS/00
OK well still would like to see the IFR numbers from a 98. From an older post I found one number: 28.89 @ 50 MAP (unfortunately they didn't post the whole table) - this is lower than my scaled value, which is (28.8/26.6)*28.024 = 30.342. So, at 50 MAP my IFR table will show higher fuel rate than a 98 IFR table, for the same injector, so mine will run leaner right? This doesn't seem right, I think they should be the same value.
If you want to get real technical, the #s you should be using from stock IFRs to derive your scalar are:
28.71/26.41 = 1.08708
If you have a stock 99-00 IFR table then just apply that through and you'll be setup for the 28#ers
I'm not talking about a few hundredth's, like I said the difference is more like 1.5 (for that one entry, 98 vs. 00 table). That's a big difference.
I can't look at stock tune files from hptuners/ls1edit since I use tunercat. I have scaled my table using that ratio (approx). But still want to know why a 98 table would have lower numbers. The table for 98 has lower numbers than any later years (99-00 scaled, 01-02 not scaled), for the same injectors? Did they use lower fuel pressure in 98? Anyone have these actual table values?
I can't look at stock tune files from hptuners/ls1edit since I use tunercat. I have scaled my table using that ratio (approx). But still want to know why a 98 table would have lower numbers. The table for 98 has lower numbers than any later years (99-00 scaled, 01-02 not scaled), for the same injectors? Did they use lower fuel pressure in 98? Anyone have these actual table values?
Last edited by patSS/00; Jun 12, 2005 at 08:24 PM.
98 table 3.62 3.64 3.66 3.69 3.71 3.73 3.75 3.77 3.80 3.81 3.84 3.86 3.88 3.90 3.92 3.95 3.96
00 table 3.33 3.35 3.38 3.39 3.41 3.44 3.45 3.48 3.49 3.52 3.53 3.55 3.57 3.59 3.61 3.63 3.65
02 table 3.13 3.15 3.17 3.20 3.22 3.24 3.24 3.26 3.29 3.30 3.33 3.34 3.36 3.38 3.39 3.42 3.43
00 table 3.33 3.35 3.38 3.39 3.41 3.44 3.45 3.48 3.49 3.52 3.53 3.55 3.57 3.59 3.61 3.63 3.65
02 table 3.13 3.15 3.17 3.20 3.22 3.24 3.24 3.26 3.29 3.30 3.33 3.34 3.36 3.38 3.39 3.42 3.43
Originally Posted by AnthonyR
98 table 3.62 3.64 3.66 3.69 3.71 3.73 3.75 3.77 3.80 3.81 3.84 3.86 3.88 3.90 3.92 3.95 3.96
00 table 3.33 3.35 3.38 3.39 3.41 3.44 3.45 3.48 3.49 3.52 3.53 3.55 3.57 3.59 3.61 3.63 3.65
02 table 3.13 3.15 3.17 3.20 3.22 3.24 3.24 3.26 3.29 3.30 3.33 3.34 3.36 3.38 3.39 3.42 3.43
00 table 3.33 3.35 3.38 3.39 3.41 3.44 3.45 3.48 3.49 3.52 3.53 3.55 3.57 3.59 3.61 3.63 3.65
02 table 3.13 3.15 3.17 3.20 3.22 3.24 3.24 3.26 3.29 3.30 3.33 3.34 3.36 3.38 3.39 3.42 3.43
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by patSS/00
I'm not talking about a few hundredth's, like I said the difference is more like 1.5 (for that one entry, 98 vs. 00 table). That's a big difference.
I can't look at stock tune files from hptuners/ls1edit since I use tunercat. I have scaled my table using that ratio (approx). But still want to know why a 98 table would have lower numbers. The table for 98 has lower numbers than any later years (99-00 scaled, 01-02 not scaled), for the same injectors? Did they use lower fuel pressure in 98? Anyone have these actual table values?
I can't look at stock tune files from hptuners/ls1edit since I use tunercat. I have scaled my table using that ratio (approx). But still want to know why a 98 table would have lower numbers. The table for 98 has lower numbers than any later years (99-00 scaled, 01-02 not scaled), for the same injectors? Did they use lower fuel pressure in 98? Anyone have these actual table values?
In HP Tiners the 98s and 01-02 have the exact same IFRs. So perhaps one of the tables you are using have been previously modified. It looks like the 02 IFRs you got here were set for 24.8#ers which doesnt look/sound right at all
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
OK thanks, now it all makes sense and txhorns is right the 98, 01, 02 are all the same, and my scaled values are pretty close to those. Those numbers I found from doing a search were just bogus.
Originally Posted by patSS/00
OK thanks, now it all makes sense and txhorns is right the 98, 01, 02 are all the same, and my scaled values are pretty close to those. Those numbers I found from doing a search were just bogus.
You got a PM!