How do the Pro's do it?
Thanks for your insight.
Chris
Trending Topics
The thinking on what's "right" has evolved a whole lot
in the years I've been watching the scene, as more of
the tuner tools' wizards cough up explanations of how
the airflow and fuel delivery calculations really work.
What was dogma two years ago is now comedy. How
tragic.
The best idea is, fix what you know is broke and don't
mess with what you don't understand. That means, you
don't jack around the injector table when all you did was
hang airflow mods on the motor; you don't change the
MAF table to fix low speed, idle airflow problems (unless
you are dead sure the MAF is being fooled somehow).
You don't change the PE table to overcome bogus airflow
measurements. At least, not until you have exhausted
the more relevant tables' fitting ability and they're as
proper as they can be. Sometimes you do have to cheat.
But not from the get-go, and not as your main strategy.
Understand the source of the error and you can find the
closest model table to adjust. Fake it once and the next
time you have to not only fake the second thing, you have
to unfake the other fake with yet more fakery and pretty
soon it's a yarn ball full of snot.
All you want is a truthful model that stays tight with the
air & fuel reality of the motor, so that your commanded
operation is received as-said. That's why you fix the boring
basics first (fuel trims, being the symptom of good/bad
airflow metering and fuel delivery) before you try and bed
in WOT fueling (a commanded thing).
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
meanwhile thoes of us who do understand it, have known why for so long that we just do it and dont bother arguing with people online.
if you really want to hear something funny, consider this.
everyone has been drilling them on heavily modded LS1 motors since '96.
a year or so back, someone said "STOP DRILLING THOES THROTTLEBODIES, and went on with a moving the blade/dicking with the TPS scheme"
up till then, there wasnt even a choice.
realistically, the two are doing an identical thing... allowing more air into the motor, so the IAC counts stay within a specified range. the only diff is one involves resetting the TPS, and realistically, requires elongating the TPS holes, so you can move the blade enough to get enough air.
the other, involved either enlarging the existing hole GM put there, or drilling a second small hole.
its only a problem when people drill a friggen huge hole thats too big.. or when you de-mod and no longer need that hole.
otherwise, there isnt anything to argue about.
im sure someone will halfass, halfway read what i said, and want to argue about it...
1) To add timing you are going to want to use the High Octane Ignition Advance Table located under the engine - ignition tab. Wide open throttle (hopefully all that you are using at the track ) is located in the lower right hand corner of this table. To add or decrease timing simply select all cells for 0.60 g/cyl and 3200 rpm and greater. You will be highlighting the lower right portion of the table. Select the 'Selected Cells Only' box. Put your desired timing change (positive to increase, negative to decrease) in the text box in the lower right. Click on the "Add" button. Select "Apply Changes" to make your changes permenant. Save your file and upload it into your car.
2) To lean out your car you are going to use the PE vs RPM table located under the engine - fuel tab. To lean out your car simply type the desired percentage shift in the lower right text box and pressy "Mult %". Press the "Apply" button to make your changes permenat. Save your file and upload it into your car.
To add fuel (enrichen your car) you will want to multiply the PE table by values greater than 100 (ie 101 to 110). To reduce fueling (lean your car) you will want to multiply the PE table by values less than 100. (ie 90 to 99). Any changes to this table should be between 90 and 110. Never multiply this table by a value less than 90 or greater than 110.
3) LTerms are for emmissions, not performance (despite the general concensus). If they are less than 15% ignore these at the track.
3) LTerms are for emmissions, not performance (despite the general concensus). If they are less than 15% ignore these at the track.[/I]
we just like to look at it because the LTFTs are working towards the avg AFR we want under part throttle, and the farther off they are, the farther off our tune is from where it should be. within reason. you cant use them as a exact science, and thats where the only debate is. i view them as a tool to help the mild cars i usually work with.... now the wideband fueling and enhanced IOs availible now, thoes are alot more accurate... lol
anyway, at the track, its not something you're looking at as much because you're usually working with WOT and PE openloop stuffs, not part throttle or cruise...
[/B][/I]
The lower right hand corner is not where you're going to be running NA for spark advance. From 60 down is too much area to cover and leaves you no room to put in any retard for a dry nitrous system.
15% fuel trim is enough at WOT to let you add almost a 100-shot of nitrous going in at the TB. Positive Ltrims will affect WOT, and 15% is WAY too much to ignore.
How a 'pro' would go about handling a tune always depends on what has been done modification-wise to the car, and what state of tune the car is in at the start.
If you haven't done anything to change the VE of the car, and you aren't getting any significant Ltrims, then there is little reason to change the shape of the VE.
If you've put in a large cam and a sheet-metal intake, then there is every reason to change the shape of the VE.
If everything else is good and you want to make an adjustment for WOT, then the PE is the place to do it.
If it needs adjustment for a ported MAF, then the MAF table is the place.






