Need to finally solve the .3 difference
Phil
Phil
Last edited by Phil99vette; Mar 25, 2006 at 10:39 AM.
Test 1: Drive with O2s and MAF enabled cruising where a/f should be 14.7x stoich
Results:
Wideband screen/logworks displays 14.7+-.07
HP Tuners shows 15.0-15.1
I think wideband with logworks are known to be correct. Fresh sensor and fresh calibration
Test 2: LM1 voltage vs A/F
started car up and averaged A/F and voltage and found 3.10 volts out to HPT = 14.2 A/F on LM1
So....
0.00 = 11.5
5.00 = 16.0
Trending Topics
ground voltage offsets between the WB and the EIO
cable. There is substantial current thrown by the LM-1
heater drive and it is also variable - leading perhaps to
a situation where there is no single offset that fits all
corners of operation, but rather an offset that varies
with exhaust gas / "natural" O2 sensor temp (and the
heater loop's required average current, there).
As an experiment it might be interesting to cut the WB
output lines and insert a series 100-ohm resistor in both
the signal and return (ground) legs; then you could put
a DMM across each resistor and see what kind of voltage
drop, indicating whether current loops / ground loops are
the cause as I suspect.
Another thing to do is, simply put a 1.5V battery to the
EIO cable input independent of the vehicle electrically;
take DMM and logged EIO voltage values and judge the
input A/D accuracy. This tells you whether there's any
intrinsic error to the EIO voltage measurement absent
any offsets coming from the larger picture.
With the two pieces not connected you could put the
DMM from EIO jack shield, to LM-1 jack shield and take
a voltage offset reading with the LM-1 lit up and heater
current running.
Be interesting to see just how much, and how variable
any such offset is.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time


