Reference: Injector flow rates
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 19
From: Arlington, Tx
Hi all,
I know everyone has anguished over injector flow rates at one time or another. I came across this website with actual flow rates for many, many injectors. I have no affiliation with this company, just a good reference.
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectordata1.htm
Enjoy!
I know everyone has anguished over injector flow rates at one time or another. I came across this website with actual flow rates for many, many injectors. I have no affiliation with this company, just a good reference.
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectordata1.htm
Enjoy!
Cool. However, it just says cc @ pressure. Is that cc per minute? Per hour? What's the conversion to lb/hr?
FYI: My SVO 30# injectors are part number 0280 150 945. That site says that they flow 312cc @ 43.5psi.
FYI: My SVO 30# injectors are part number 0280 150 945. That site says that they flow 312cc @ 43.5psi.
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 19
From: Arlington, Tx
Originally Posted by Scooter70
Cool. However, it just says cc @ pressure. Is that cc per minute? Per hour? What's the conversion to lb/hr?
FYI: My SVO 30# injectors are part number 0280 150 945. That site says that they flow 312cc @ 43.5psi.
FYI: My SVO 30# injectors are part number 0280 150 945. That site says that they flow 312cc @ 43.5psi.
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.htm
theres a sticky in the fuel and injection section already for fuel injector calculator also, maybe post this in there and ask it to be a sticky also. but this is the same thing
https://ls1tech.com/forums/fueling-injection-8/
https://ls1tech.com/forums/fueling-injection-8/
Originally Posted by 405HP_Z06
It's cc/min. This link has a calculator to convert from cc/min to lb/hr:
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.htm
http://www.witchhunter.com/injectorcalc1.htm
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,215
Likes: 19
From: Arlington, Tx
Originally Posted by Scooter70
Thanks. 312cc/min = 29.714 lb/hr. I guess 30# is pretty close. 

Wouldn't it be more accurate to find out exactly how much your fuel weighs? And doesn't that depend on the type/octane and temperature?
'cause if I use 6.25 gal = 1 lb (assuming I'm using 87 octane at ~ 70°F), then the formula wouldn't be using a simple 1 lb/hr = 10.5 cc/min.
Instead it would be: Total cc/min = x (lb/hr) * 3785.4118 (cc) / 6.25 (gal/lb) * 60 (min)
Now, the weight isn't very accurate. Google isn't very accurate either it seems, but using those figures I get 1 lb/hr = 10.09 cc/min, or 30 lb/hr = 302.83 cc/min. Apparently premium gasoline is close to 6.35 gal = 1 lb, which is 298.06 cc/min for 30 lb/hr injectors... FYI, I'm finding everything from 6.0 gallons per 1 lb to 6.5 gallons per 1 lb of gasoline. I think I'm just going to fill up a gas can and weigh my own damn fuel for greatest accuracy.
Good thread though.
'cause if I use 6.25 gal = 1 lb (assuming I'm using 87 octane at ~ 70°F), then the formula wouldn't be using a simple 1 lb/hr = 10.5 cc/min.
Instead it would be: Total cc/min = x (lb/hr) * 3785.4118 (cc) / 6.25 (gal/lb) * 60 (min)
Now, the weight isn't very accurate. Google isn't very accurate either it seems, but using those figures I get 1 lb/hr = 10.09 cc/min, or 30 lb/hr = 302.83 cc/min. Apparently premium gasoline is close to 6.35 gal = 1 lb, which is 298.06 cc/min for 30 lb/hr injectors... FYI, I'm finding everything from 6.0 gallons per 1 lb to 6.5 gallons per 1 lb of gasoline. I think I'm just going to fill up a gas can and weigh my own damn fuel for greatest accuracy.
Good thread though.
Trending Topics
Injector delivery is really volume based and unless
you are using gasoline to test, the lb/hr would be
off (unless you correct for gasoline/reference fluid
densities). Most pros prefer to use the reference
fluid it seems (which does have very carefully
measured attributes).
you are using gasoline to test, the lb/hr would be
off (unless you correct for gasoline/reference fluid
densities). Most pros prefer to use the reference
fluid it seems (which does have very carefully
measured attributes).


