PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo

Tuned Port ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #1  
Old Geezer's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 71
From: GA, USA
Thumbs down Tuned Port ??

Am trying to diagnos a problem on a tune port in a street rod.
86/305, using a speed density ECM.
Problem is: When I attempt to set base timing at 6*, I disconnect the ESC bypass, and look for the 6*... The first time I did this, it was waaay higher. Adjusted the dist to get the 6, and the engine won't start. I checked the rotor position.. dead on.
Adding timing w/ the dist will allow it to start, but run poorly. I added timng, shut it down, reconnected the ESC connector, disconnected the ECM power, then restarted the engine.. Way too much at idle.. 36*. Disconnected the ESC bypass... still 36*. The exh fumes are terrible, indicating a problem.
Someone mentioned that the dist module taking a crap will do this. Y? N?...

NE input is appreciated!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 03:46 PM
  #2  
dynocar's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Default

Never seen a module cause it, could be that the outer ring of the harmonic balancer has drifted causing your timing mark to be in error. A TDC check with a piston stop on cyl #1 may be in order.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #3  
Old Geezer's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 71
From: GA, USA
Thumbs up Yep...

Originally Posted by dynocar
Never seen a module cause it, could be that the outer ring of the harmonic balancer has drifted causing your timing mark to be in error. A TDC check with a piston stop on cyl #1 may be in order.
Thanks for the reply....
The customer had replaced the original balancer, as it had shucked the outer ring off location.
I wondered if the correct replacement was used. He said they checked the pt # several times, to be sure...
I'd guess it's not.
The piston stop is the next "stop".

Thanks, again!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #4  
GOaT Cheese's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by dynocar
Never seen a module cause it, could be that the outer ring of the harmonic balancer has drifted causing your timing mark to be in error. A TDC check with a piston stop on cyl #1 may be in order.
Also the 5.0 and 5.7 had their respective timing indicators at different locations on the front cover. If a 5.0 balncer is installed with a 5.7 timing indicator...well you get the picture.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 07:12 AM
  #5  
Old Geezer's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 71
From: GA, USA
Talking I built..

Originally Posted by GOaT Cheese
Also the 5.0 and 5.7 had their respective timing indicators at different locations on the front cover. If a 5.0 balancer is installed with a 5.7 timing indicator...well you get the picture.
this engine 10 yrs ago, using all the original components, such as the ft cover, pan, yadda, yadda.
I'm confident that the cover is correct. And, as you mention, the balancer is likely a 350 item.
[The customer thot he was dealing above the intelligence level of Autozone, when he went to a parts store that knows better. NOT!]

I'll do the stop deal, and remark the balancer... All should be good to go, then.

Thanks for the help
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 05:27 PM
  #6  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by GOaT Cheese
Also the 5.0 and 5.7 had their respective timing indicators at different locations on the front cover. If a 5.0 balncer is installed with a 5.7 timing indicator...well you get the picture.

i used to have an 86 TA with the TPI. the balancer for the 305 carb is different than for the 305 TPI. the carb version had the timing mark on the balancer at 12:00. the TPI motor put it around 2:00. reason being is the TB hung over the water pump blocking the view of the mark from behind the water pump.

so, most likely he got one for the 305 carb motor and not the 305 TPI motor. the 305 TPI balancer is the same as one for a 350.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 05:29 PM
  #7  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

Originally Posted by Old Geezer
this engine 10 yrs ago, using all the original components, such as the ft cover, pan, yadda, yadda.
I'm confident that the cover is correct. And, as you mention, the balancer is likely a 350 item.
[The customer thot he was dealing above the intelligence level of Autozone, when he went to a parts store that knows better. NOT!]

I'll do the stop deal, and remark the balancer... All should be good to go, then.

Thanks for the help
actually, if it was a 350 one, it would be the correct one. so, the autozone intelligence went 305 carb for 1986, not 305 TPI.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #8  
mrr23's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: orlando, fl
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=606592
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #9  
GOaT Cheese's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by mrr23
i used to have an 86 TA with the TPI. the balancer for the 305 carb is different than for the 305 TPI. the carb version had the timing mark on the balancer at 12:00. the TPI motor put it around 2:00. reason being is the TB hung over the water pump blocking the view of the mark from behind the water pump.

so, most likely he got one for the 305 carb motor and not the 305 TPI motor. the 305 TPI balancer is the same as one for a 350.
It is unfortunately not quite that simple. There were a whole bunch of different combos for different applications. He could have a balancer for a 267,305,or 350 that could have the timing mark at either position. And on top of that to add confusion, I have personally seen balancers with two timing marks. The best way to find out for sure is to use a piston stop.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 06:59 AM
  #10  
Old Geezer's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,639
Likes: 71
From: GA, USA
Thumbs up Thanks for the...

responses.
The positive stop diagnosis is the next operation. I'll just remark the current balancer, and call it good. This "thing" is so much "fun" to work on, too. NOT!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.