Driveability tune VS. Dyno Tune, which is better?
Which one is better?
Or do they both have their strengths and weaknesses?
Is either one better for a simple header/exhaust/intake/A4 car?
Dynos are tools , WOT tuning most times , part throttle tuning is important also , I would do Dyno then street tune .
FWIW, I was on two different dynos (Dyno Jet and Mustang) last weekend and both times the car ran LEANER on the dyno than it did on the drive home (more so on the DJ). Some cars will run richer on the dyno. On the street AFR is what counts though.
A good tune should be complete. It should cover the lower rpm, idle, off idle, return to idle, etc. Along with WOT tuning which is mainly PE and ignition timing, after the part throttle stuff is straightened out.
Trending Topics
You ever notice that tuned cars in the dyno section, if displaying an AFR that isn't all over the place are ALWAYS in like a straight line...
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I prefer to stay 12.6/12.8 or so it seems to generate the best engine longevity on NA applications. Secondly the 4-5 hp your picking up a leaning it out is most likely going to be so minimal you'll never see it.
Durability over 5 hp isn't a big deal. I geuss thats where the prioritys lay.It depends on your methodology. the Flat AFR is just a result of everybody chasing the same number mindlessly.
don;t however take the blanket statement that those are optimal AFR's. It definately can shift with comrpession,camshaft manifold choices.
To adress the thread title get on a good mustang or similarly loading dyno.make sure it has a vehicle simulation mode where you can run the car loaded as it would be on a street. Use grades and such to push the hills up and down to achive the loads you need.
whats going to take time is the Ve table adjustments to get transient fueling.
Last edited by LS1curious; Jul 24, 2007 at 07:45 PM.






