PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo

Log Works vs. HP tuners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #1  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default Log Works vs. HP tuners

Thought I'd get more of a response in a separate thread. Logging my LC1 through the rear o2 sensor and finally got it working properly, or so I think. When comparing the Log Works and HP tuners at idle I see a difference of anywhere from 0, to .5, to 1.0 in my AFR, the Log Works showing leaner. What would cause this? Or is that normal? I wouldn't think so; but I know almost nothing on the matter. Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #2  
oange ss's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 6
From: Texas
Default

you proabaly have a ground offset somehwere...FYI LogWorks reads the AFR digitally straight from the sensor, bypassing the analog side of the controller...in short if both read differently, believe LogWorks...
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #3  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

Not to sound dumb; but please explain ground offset. I knew that the Log Works came straight from the sensor, I didn't know how much difference I should be seeing. Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2007 | 10:07 AM
  #4  
Eurospec2's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville Florida
Default

Originally Posted by RZRSEDGE
Not to sound dumb; but please explain ground offset. I knew that the Log Works came straight from the sensor, I didn't know how much difference I should be seeing. Thanks!
If everything is set up properly, you shoudnt see any difference.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2007 | 10:12 AM
  #5  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

Okay, then what would make it do this? A crappy solder maybe? I would think that the grounds for the factory o2 should be pretty good. I appreciate the info guys, please keep it coming. I need all the help I can get.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #6  
oange ss's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 6
From: Texas
Default

both programs are seeing different ground references..ground both in the same place to minimize or eliminate offsets...
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2007 | 07:28 AM
  #7  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

They are both grounded through the o2 sensor. The stock sensor ground for the system and the stock heater ground for the heater. Maybe the solder on the out put wire back to the computer? I've got it in my lap as we speak so I may check the solder and redo it to see if that corrects it. Thanks guys! Any more suggestions?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #8  
oange ss's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 6
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by RZRSEDGE
They are both grounded through the o2 sensor. The stock sensor ground for the system and the stock heater ground for the heater. Maybe the solder on the out put wire back to the computer? I've got it in my lap as we speak so I may check the solder and redo it to see if that corrects it. Thanks guys! Any more suggestions?
the signal ground for the stock O2 is not a true "ground", move the grounds to a PCM ground (except for the heater ground, that one is ok)
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2007 | 12:27 PM
  #9  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

Thanks guys, I'm gonna work on it some more when I come in tomorrow. Third shift sucks!
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2007 | 04:56 PM
  #10  
MeentSS02's Avatar
Kleeborp the Moderator™
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,316
Likes: 6
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by RZRSEDGE
Thanks guys, I'm gonna work on it some more when I come in tomorrow. Third shift sucks!
The LC1 is very sensitive to where it is grounded...your HPT cable is grounded through the OBDII port, which I think ends up grounding to the engine block at some point.

Try grounding the LC-1 to the engine block, and try again. I have mine grounded to the passenger side head, and the XD-1 gauge and HPT agree at all times, 100%.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #11  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

I fooled around with it some today, I had re-soldered my connections to get that variable completely out of the way. Seemed to be a little better; but still slightly different. As suggested, I'll probably ground to engine and maybe source a new power supply. It will have to wait a little while though due to work. I think that I will also swap the pin on the pcm from the stock rear nbo2 to where the egr pin is on the computer. Anyone know the pin #'s for the rear o2s? Could someone who has done this through the rear o2s also chime in on your readings in HP or EFI vs. your Log Works. Thanks again to all.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 10:05 PM
  #12  
MeentSS02's Avatar
Kleeborp the Moderator™
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,316
Likes: 6
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Originally Posted by RZRSEDGE
I fooled around with it some today, I had re-soldered my connections to get that variable completely out of the way. Seemed to be a little better; but still slightly different. As suggested, I'll probably ground to engine and maybe source a new power supply. It will have to wait a little while though due to work. I think that I will also swap the pin on the pcm from the stock rear nbo2 to where the egr pin is on the computer. Anyone know the pin #'s for the rear o2s? Could someone who has done this through the rear o2s also chime in on your readings in HP or EFI vs. your Log Works. Thanks again to all.
Oh let's see here...

Can you compare the raw voltage output between both? Once upon a time, I set my LC-1 to output a fixed voltage for all AFRs (you can program it to do that if I'm remembering right)...in HPT, you can log raw voltage input, and let it run in a histogram to show you the overall average voltage.

If you tell the LC-1 to output 2.5V for all AFRs, and HPT reads 2.5V in, then you don't have a voltage offset problem.

Try that and let us know what you find. It could be something as simple as a miscalibration in your logging software...
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #13  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

Cool! Will do ASAP. Thanks!
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2007 | 03:24 PM
  #14  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

Okay, after a long delay I finally was able to try this. One thing I did do is put the o2 voltage wire into pin 55 on the computer, adjusted my pid in HP tuners, and enabled EGR in my computer. After setting up my LC1 for 5v, I checked by flat lining the LC1 at different values and checking in HP tuners. With the key on and engine not running at 2.5v on LC1, I get 2.504 in HP tuners. With car at idle I get 2.506-2.508. This is as far off as the voltage gets. Tried it at 1v, 2.5v, and 5v. With the 2.5v having the most or same offset. My problem NOW is that in Logworks, I see 7.4 regardless of what I set my voltage at. Running or not. After it sits for a few minutes on, it will slowly begin to climb in a jittery manner until it pegs out. With the LC1 flat lined at 1v! Now I'm getting fed up with this! Any suggestions? Bad o2 sensor maybe? If so, that sucks cause it is never been used to tune with yet!
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #15  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

Bump for help.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #16  
MeentSS02's Avatar
Kleeborp the Moderator™
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,316
Likes: 6
From: Dayton, OH
Default

7.4 sounds to me like a bad sensor, or the controller is bad. Have you tried asking these questions through Innovate's forum? That was the first place I turned with my questions, and they usually have a pretty good clue as to what to do next.

The LC-1 is very sensitive to how it is wired to your car, and there have been a lot of failures due to improper install.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2007 | 01:31 PM
  #17  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

No but will do now.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #18  
oange ss's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 6
From: Texas
Default

sounds like the controller is bad
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 08:04 AM
  #19  
RZRSEDGE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Tellico Plains, TN
Default

Well that certainly sucks!
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #20  
Doc's Avatar
Doc
FormerVendor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,573
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Fl
Default

Sounds like your controller is fine. Your offset is .04vdc. You need to account for this in the HPT PID. Then you need to set your LC-1 analog out channel back to the original configuration for HPT. Note, everytime you re-program your LC-1 you need to completely power it down (including pulling both the serial to USB cable to your laptop and the gnd wire to HPT-as these can prevent the LC-1 from fully shutting down) and close out the LM Programer software.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.