AWDTBSS

those numbers seem a little low thats wat i made in my ss 330awhp with just longtubes, efans, intake, and tune

CanadianGoat

What kind of numbers did it have at the track??

For the non believers heres a the vid from last weekend with me running against my friends 06 GTO (He has a CAI and Predator Tuner) and was running 12.9 - 13.0's all day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tNC-1xi2AE

AWDTBSS

alot slower with the extra 1000lbs lol. im prolly 13.5-13.7 range
mine was on a mustang dyno as well

CanadianGoat

Why did you think mine was low at 338 rwhp on a Mustang dyno with just shorty headers and a tune? when you only made 330 with LT's??

AWDTBSS

cuz im all wheel drive

CanadianGoat

Well for me its all about the track times. I personally dont really care much about dyno numbers as they are only a benchmark for you to use for modding and tuning.
Obvisouly Ive had mine on a DynoJet and a Mustang Dyno and have heard my numbers are too high or too low. Which one is it?

I like the comments "No way youve run those numbers with your mods". I have and if you dont want to believe it then dont--I could care less.

danieloneil01

Haters are gunna hate.

AWDTBSS

lol i hear u man track times are the only thing that matters, just was expecting more. u must have a strong running car

breze84

No your not... Ive been around the LSX scene for a long time and your not making that power with those mods... Neither is the Canadian Goat guy with his mods... Your mods your probably in the 330whp range...

AWDTBSS

ys that my uncles 07 c6 auto with intake, cat-back, and tune makes 355rwhp.
it is possible

Theblacknightls1

iTrader: (1)

On a gto is it hard to break 11s or is it pretty easy???.. Havnt went down the 1/4 mile yet with my new mods so im hoping to break 11s but i think i might be stuck in the 12s somewhere..

CanadianGoat

Well then--can you tell me what i AM making then? I had it tuned on a Mustang Dyno and after the tune the numbers were 338/331 corrected. Is that too much? too little? I post dyno grapsh/ time slips and still it isnt good enough. w/e

danieloneil01

Your track numbers prove dyno numbers don't mean ****.

danieloneil01

Hard isn't the real question. It's "is your pocket book bigger than most"? The GTO is a fat bitch and trying to turn it into a drag car at 3800+lbs.

flintwrench69

iTrader: (11)

I had my car dynoed on both a dynojet & a mustang but with different mods. I put down 339 on a dynojet with mods in sig before cam & tune. I then put down 380 on a mustang dyno after cam & tune. Not much of a swing, as far as different dynos reading higher & lower. Your 338/331 numbers sound about right for an LS2 & maybe a little low, but that 386 dynojet reading I suspect. A dynojet will give a higher reading but thats really high. Makes me wonder if the pulls were done right. Those are good runs with those mods, might be unbelievable to people that cant drive but not that unbelievable. I have seen cam & heads LS F-body autos run 12.9s-13.9s cuz they cant drive, or they have shitty tires. The reason your 1/8 mile traps were 93mph is that Lapeers 1/8 mile reads 2-3 mph high, I have compared it with other tracks & everything else there is consistently the same with other tracks.

breze84

Ya but your talking about a C6 LS2 not a Fbody LS1....

breze84

your right where you should be power wise on a Mustang Dyno... On a Dynojet your probably in the 360 - 365whp range which is correct...

CanadianGoat

So for me I am only 5% lower on a Mustang dyno rather than the widely accepted 10 - 12% difference?

AWDTBSS

He has a ls2 gto....

breze84

The guy I was commenting on was saying that about a Fbody LS1 Camaro not a GTO...