Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

*General* FAST LSXr 102 thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2016, 01:37 PM
  #341  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Mercier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Posted this in Gen IV but figured I would share here in the *General* 102 thread.

Picked up a 102 complete with the mid-length("High HP") runners already installed. So this is available.

Here is a pic and the part number.




Old 10-03-2016, 07:31 PM
  #342  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Cool, I was thinking they never ended up making them. I swapped from a 92 to a 102 and can feel a slight difference above 5500rpm. Not a lot but a little.
Old 10-03-2016, 08:03 PM
  #343  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
pyro719's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: colorado springs Elevation: 6035 ft
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Don't the shorter runners produce high rpm horsepower and less torque? Seems like the oposite of what you want in a 4,000 lb car?
Originally Posted by Mercier
Posted this in Gen IV but figured I would share here in the *General* 102 thread.

Picked up a 102 complete with the mid-length("High HP") runners already installed. So this is available.

Here is a pic and the part number.




Old 10-03-2016, 09:12 PM
  #344  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,240
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes on 72 Posts

Default

Name:  20161006_140027_zpsfj7mlgbz.jpeg
Views: 370
Size:  899.5 KBName:  20161006_140043_zpsfnpdk7nk.jpeg
Views: 386
Size:  283.9 KBName:  20161006_140129_zpstvggbbcv.jpeg
Views: 345
Size:  839.9 KB

Last edited by 01ssreda4; 10-09-2016 at 08:14 AM.
Old 10-03-2016, 09:26 PM
  #345  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Mercier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pyro719
Don't the shorter runners produce high rpm horsepower and less torque? Seems like the oposite of what you want in a 4,000 lb car?
Yes; though the mid runners don't appear to lose much if anything down low like the "race" runners and I want peak power 7K+.
It does seem but I'm doing something a bit different. Aluminum flywheel, solid roller, 4.56s, 2.29 Magnum. Want to turn some RPM. Not practical but not important.
Old 10-05-2016, 12:26 PM
  #346  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
CAMMOTION PERF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 507
Received 106 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mercier
Posted this in Gen IV but figured I would share here in the *General* 102 thread.

Picked up a 102 complete with the mid-length("High HP") runners already installed. So this is available.

Here is a pic and the part number.




I just help a customer put together a complete top end package for use with those runners. He was looking to shift at 7500 RPM. I am looking forward to the results.
Old 10-05-2016, 01:00 PM
  #347  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Guess us Neanderthal cathedral port guys are just **** out of luck.
Old 10-05-2016, 01:25 PM
  #348  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Mercier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Seems silly none for the cathedral ports. That's a gigantic population of engines that mostly started with smaller displacements compared to the (factory)square-port engines. Less cubes generally requires more RPM to make same power...and shorter runners seem to be the ticket for that. Not to mention the crap-ton of aftermarket cathedral head offerings that beg for this.
Old 11-14-2016, 12:49 PM
  #349  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
z-maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 1,287
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Does anyone happen to have the instructions for the LS1/LS6 manifold? I ended up getting one off the classifieds from someone who changed directions but it didn't come with instructions and all I can find online is for the LS3. If one of you guys could scan and upload the instructions that would be greatly appreciated!
Old 11-14-2016, 09:21 PM
  #350  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Letsndy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So the 92 will fit without any modifications? No issues? On a 01 ws6 ls1
Old 11-14-2016, 09:34 PM
  #351  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
scotty2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Just installed a 102 on my C5Z. I ported it myself. Thing rips my face off!





Old 11-15-2016, 08:04 AM
  #352  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
z-maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 1,287
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by scotty2000ss
Just installed a 102 on my C5Z. I ported it myself. Thing rips my face off!

Is that the Heatshield products I-M thermal barrier? If so how does it fit? I'm not sure if it is just a gimmick but I figure it can't hurt as long as it doesn't cause any mounting issues.
Old 11-15-2016, 09:52 AM
  #353  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

How time consuming was the port work Scotty? Do you mind explaining the process a bit?
Old 11-15-2016, 10:51 AM
  #354  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
scotty2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z-camaro
Is that the Heatshield products I-M thermal barrier? If so how does it fit? I'm not sure if it is just a gimmick but I figure it can't hurt as long as it doesn't cause any mounting issues.
It cost me about $45 with shipping. I used the Hinson short mounts to help with clear. It's a tight fit on the C5 bt I didn't have any issues. Might as well do the heat shield right?

Originally Posted by Jtm2085
How time consuming was the port work Scotty? Do you mind explaining the process a bit?
I did the port work over the winter so I took my time. If you worked on it over the weekends I bet you could have it done in as little as 2 weeks if you port it the way I did. It's not the normal "Porting" that other people are doing. I removed material on the runners ( top and bottom). I found a thread on corvette forum that a guy did this on his C6. He picked up 10 HP just from shaving down the runners. He only did the bottom... I'll see if I can dig up the thread.
Old 11-15-2016, 11:25 AM
  #355  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Letsndy
So the 92 will fit without any modifications? No issues? On a 01 ws6 ls1
Correct. Use the stock fuel rail. No grinding. My SLP lid didn't line up right. Too much of a downward angle. But I did change the heads also.
Old 11-15-2016, 01:06 PM
  #356  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
scotty2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Here's the thread about the porting I was talking about. If anyone has any questions about what tools I used send me a PM.

http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/...g-results.html
Old 11-15-2016, 01:39 PM
  #357  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
BREWS02WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by scotty2000ss
Here's the thread about the porting I was talking about. If anyone has any questions about what tools I used send me a PM.

http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/...g-results.html
Wow, this is impressive! I've got one of the heat shields waiting to install when/if I ever had to take the FAST off...maybe this will push me to remove it and port at the same time. Were your gains strictly from porting, or did you install the heat barrier between pulls as well? I've heard they're good for around 2% increase in RWHP.
Old 11-15-2016, 01:39 PM
  #358  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
z-maro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MN
Posts: 1,287
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by scotty2000ss
It cost me about $45 with shipping. I used the Hinson short mounts to help with clear. It's a tight fit on the C5 bt I didn't have any issues. Might as well do the heat shield right?
I was more wondering if it caused any issues bolting the intake to the engine and having the ports match up and seal to the heads. Just wanted to make sure there is enough room under the intake for it to fit.
Old 11-15-2016, 03:28 PM
  #359  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
scotty2000ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 2,090
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by z-camaro
I was more wondering if it caused any issues bolting the intake to the engine and having the ports match up and seal to the heads. Just wanted to make sure there is enough room under the intake for it to fit.
I haven't had any issues so far.
Old 11-15-2016, 07:36 PM
  #360  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Jtm2085's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,219
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by scotty2000ss
Here's the thread about the porting I was talking about. If anyone has any questions about what tools I used send me a PM.

http://www.corvetteforum.com/forums/...g-results.html
Thanks bud


Quick Reply: *General* FAST LSXr 102 thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.