6g ss vs 5.0 (both modded) neither my cars
01-06-2017, 02:35 AM
#141
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
99% of that is untrue. I went 11.46@121.xx in 3000+ DA. No suspension work. Super undergeared. Only weight reduction was drag pack. 3760 raceweight. 0 passes were logged. I was on E85 that costs $1.42 a gallon. I think that's decent. Not amazing at all but decent.
01-06-2017, 03:00 AM
#143
99% of that is untrue. I went 11.46@121.xx in 3000+ DA. No suspension work. Super undergeared. Only weight reduction was drag pack. 3760 raceweight. 0 passes were logged. I was on E85 that costs $1.42 a gallon. I think that's decent. Not amazing at all but decent.
01-06-2017, 04:10 AM
#144
Teching In
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know....I am just sharing that I think my setup was terrible and did OK in bad air. So a solid setup in good air will fly. Same goes for a six gen. Stock Six gens are light years faster than a stock Yote so I guess I just thought they would be much faster modded than they have been. That's what we're saying here is that when mods start the gap closes extremely fast.
01-06-2017, 10:03 AM
#149
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clear Lake Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of you others on here act as if you personally own a huge portion of one of the big 3 smh.
01-06-2017, 10:14 AM
#152
7 Second Club
01-06-2017, 10:19 AM
#153
It is not better from a roll. That's your opinion. I do not believe it. The only thing on the side of the m6 is 5-10 rwhp. Speed and gearing will do more. Evan smith driver from higher speed rolls could do better. Have you even seen the trap speeds on the fast list lately ? At speeds below 120 the m6 is not faster. Period.
Yep the fastest 93 car vs average 6 g. That holds no water. Again show me 1 car that has done it 93 or e85 only. I can show you 4 6g currently totally stock 11.9. And more people tracking the s550 and for longer. It's not rocket science. Your example of 6g was garbage they were not hooking. Mappins called you out on that. My example was a drag pack auto car dead hooking. I literally embarrassed it
Again apples to apples not happening. And you couldn't have even done it with your car e85 only either. Your vids prove this. I don't know what you are trying to argue. You really want me to believe a 93 tune alone adds a half second to an s550. Give me a break. And yeah I do get a little mad when something as dumb as that is trying to be sold. It's simply untrue.
Sure it's possible to run with the 6g 93 tune. It's possible totally stock. That's not the point. All things equal an s550 is not capable of the same times with just a 93 tune.
Yep the fastest 93 car vs average 6 g. That holds no water. Again show me 1 car that has done it 93 or e85 only. I can show you 4 6g currently totally stock 11.9. And more people tracking the s550 and for longer. It's not rocket science. Your example of 6g was garbage they were not hooking. Mappins called you out on that. My example was a drag pack auto car dead hooking. I literally embarrassed it
Again apples to apples not happening. And you couldn't have even done it with your car e85 only either. Your vids prove this. I don't know what you are trying to argue. You really want me to believe a 93 tune alone adds a half second to an s550. Give me a break. And yeah I do get a little mad when something as dumb as that is trying to be sold. It's simply untrue.
Sure it's possible to run with the 6g 93 tune. It's possible totally stock. That's not the point. All things equal an s550 is not capable of the same times with just a 93 tune.
01-06-2017, 10:27 AM
#155
You have an opinion. I have a fact
You're wrong
Nice job using best case scenario vs averages. The average 93 car won't run with the average 6g
If you call run with .2 to .3 behind I agree. They are not equal at that point but almost a drivers race
01-06-2017, 10:32 AM
#156
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes I'm very butthurt with a heads cam blown 6g, who just sold my F250 diesel. So I guess I'm not brand loyal and butthurt too right? Get outta here with that bs dude. I can talk like this because I had actually signed (in finance) paperwork for a brand new 5.0 before the 6g but backed out. I hate it when you pose a disagreement then you are butthurt. Ford, Chrysler, or gm don't pay my bills nor sign my paycheck so I could give 2 ***** about brand loyalty.
Some of you others on here act as if you personally own a huge portion of one of the big 3 smh.
Some of you others on here act as if you personally own a huge portion of one of the big 3 smh.
01-06-2017, 10:55 AM
#157
Stock 6 g been faster than any 93 only car ever. Many times.
You have an opinion. I have a fact
You're wrong
Nice job using best case scenario vs averages. The average 93 car won't run with the average 6g
If you call run with .2 to .3 behind I agree. They are not equal at that point but almost a drivers race
You have an opinion. I have a fact
You're wrong
Nice job using best case scenario vs averages. The average 93 car won't run with the average 6g
If you call run with .2 to .3 behind I agree. They are not equal at that point but almost a drivers race
01-06-2017, 12:12 PM
#159
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I think your 12.4 was not stock....and not real. Lots of people throw around timing error statements on here. But when you have one 12.4.....no 12.5s....no 12.6s... no 12.7s....but you do have several 12.8s then it's pretty clear. Especially with a auto car.
So it seems like you're saying you woulda got beat on all but 1 run that day by a stock 6gen. Even tho lots of 6gens go faster than a 12.4 if drivin right. So there's a great chance you woulda got beat on that run also.
With all the tm that seems to be involved with a 6gen (even a 5gen) tuning out just the tm would be huge......i mean YUGE.
So you claiming a tune makes no difference is false. Even if the tune makes no difference at all in "power" it can make a large difference in acceleration.
So it seems like you're saying you woulda got beat on all but 1 run that day by a stock 6gen. Even tho lots of 6gens go faster than a 12.4 if drivin right. So there's a great chance you woulda got beat on that run also.
With all the tm that seems to be involved with a 6gen (even a 5gen) tuning out just the tm would be huge......i mean YUGE.
So you claiming a tune makes no difference is false. Even if the tune makes no difference at all in "power" it can make a large difference in acceleration.
Last edited by HioSSilver; 01-06-2017 at 12:21 PM.