6g ss vs 5.0 (both modded) neither my cars
01-05-2017, 03:29 PM
#102
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We all acknowledge the 6G is faster stock or near stock with a .4-.6@4-6mph advantage. The Br0 has just been quicker and faster with bolt ons.
No need to be mad about the facts.
No need to be mad about the facts.
01-05-2017, 04:00 PM
#103
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can run with a stock 6gen with 93octane tune only. Can beat stock 6gen with Flex fuel tune/E85. When you start adding more mods to both cars its a crapshoot depending on how each car is tuned/modded etc etc... too many variable with modded cars. My bolton S550 runs alot better than alot of other bolton S550/S197s... so depends on the cars racing.
My buddy has an A8 6gen with flex fuel tune/e85, MSD intake, ZL1 swaybars, springs etc.. we are going to try to run soon.
My buddy has an A8 6gen with flex fuel tune/e85, MSD intake, ZL1 swaybars, springs etc.. we are going to try to run soon.
Generally speaking of corse, I think it would take little bit more than just a 93 tune. On AVRAGE what does a 93 br0 run?
And I would say that your car does run good I give you that. Makes me wonder why more people didn't go auto actually. Did they ever fix that MT82 problem?
01-05-2017, 04:04 PM
#104
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think he was stating what he thinks it takes to close the gap, not record-setting cars.
01-05-2017, 04:17 PM
#106
No one has ever done it. And the gains from a 93 tune alone can never make up for a half second. Not on this planet.
An e85 tune ALONE gets them very close. And again. It has never been done. It takes e85 and an additional effective bolt on of ones choice to surpass what several people have done in a stock 6g. Which has been out half as long with half again as many sales and half again tracking them with dedication. Pretty much 1/4 to 1/8 effective user base and still coming out far ahead in this argument
I'd also have to say the trap speed difference is closer than the et. I'd say it's about 3-4 mph stock to stock.
I was only out trapping a tune and drag pack s550 by 3 mph all night but was quicker by .5. The stock converter sucks and they have a lot less bottom end. Another point... what it takes for an s550 to beat a 6g from a roll will not be the same as at the strip/from a dig both hooking and stock converters
I couldn't agree any more
01-05-2017, 04:28 PM
#109
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clear Lake Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty much. Just another deflection.
No one has ever done it. And the gains from a 93 tune alone can never make up for a half second. Not on this planet.
An e85 tune ALONE gets them very close. And again. It has never been done. It takes e85 and an additional effective bolt on of ones choice to surpass what several people have done in a stock 6g. Which has been out half as long with half again as many sales and half again tracking them with dedication. Pretty much 1/4 to 1/8 effective user base and still coming out far ahead in this argument
I'd also have to say the trap speed difference is closer than the et. I'd say it's about 3-4 mph stock to stock.
I was only out trapping a tune and drag pack s550 by 3 mph all night but was quicker by .5. The stock converter sucks and they have a lot less bottom end. Another point... what it takes for an s550 to beat a 6g from a roll will not be the same as at the strip/from a dig both hooking and stock converters
No one has ever done it. And the gains from a 93 tune alone can never make up for a half second. Not on this planet.
An e85 tune ALONE gets them very close. And again. It has never been done. It takes e85 and an additional effective bolt on of ones choice to surpass what several people have done in a stock 6g. Which has been out half as long with half again as many sales and half again tracking them with dedication. Pretty much 1/4 to 1/8 effective user base and still coming out far ahead in this argument
I'd also have to say the trap speed difference is closer than the et. I'd say it's about 3-4 mph stock to stock.
I was only out trapping a tune and drag pack s550 by 3 mph all night but was quicker by .5. The stock converter sucks and they have a lot less bottom end. Another point... what it takes for an s550 to beat a 6g from a roll will not be the same as at the strip/from a dig both hooking and stock converters
01-05-2017, 06:28 PM
#111
Wrong my friend.
Stating facts on another subject and not responding to the subject at hand is deflection. Doesn't matter if what you are talking about is a fact or a page from the Never Ending Story. Its a deflection.
Matter of fact...stating facts on different subject matter is trying even harder to deflect now that I think about it.
I said it takes more than just a 93 tune. I provided many reasons. Fast lists. Personal experience. And the impossibility of the known gains from a 93 tune alone to bridge the half second stock gap. You provided a couple wise cracks, pointed to more heavily modded cars and never once replied to the initial argument.
the end.
Stating facts on another subject and not responding to the subject at hand is deflection. Doesn't matter if what you are talking about is a fact or a page from the Never Ending Story. Its a deflection.
Matter of fact...stating facts on different subject matter is trying even harder to deflect now that I think about it.
I said it takes more than just a 93 tune. I provided many reasons. Fast lists. Personal experience. And the impossibility of the known gains from a 93 tune alone to bridge the half second stock gap. You provided a couple wise cracks, pointed to more heavily modded cars and never once replied to the initial argument.
the end.
01-05-2017, 06:34 PM
#113
This has been my observations doing rolls with a few different br0's. A tune only vs stock was not a match for me. A 93 lbo car is close, An E85 only (never ran one) don't know, An E85 lbo is a drivers race with the edge to the br0. I have vids to back this all up on my 6g when stock. I'm not talking every single modded br0 but the ones I ran it takes a lbo E85 to meet or beat a stock 6g.
Its more than some of the stang crowd wants to admit and less than some of the Camaro crowd wants to admit. An FBO mustang will bitch slap a stock 6g. Vids showing otherwise are fun to watch but something is probably up or car isn't proper.
01-05-2017, 07:24 PM
#116
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01-05-2017, 07:54 PM
#119
Banned
iTrader: (1)
!["MAC"'s Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%237f3b59' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>"</text></svg>)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
9s bolt on coyote.... where is the 6th gen doing that? How about a 5th gen doing that? What about a 4th Gen doing that? 3rd Gen doing that? 2nd Gen doing that? 1st Gen doing that?
8s slb fi coyote... has any camaros ever done that?
8s slb fi coyote... has any camaros ever done that?