Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

99TA - 416 build - Stolen, damaged and getting repaired

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-2017, 08:20 PM
  #61  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Yup. I would definitely run some nice cathedrals over a ls3 head as well.
Old 04-14-2017, 05:57 AM
  #62  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

I apologize to everyone for being grumpy and probably coming off as a testy or salty bastard yesterday. Having to find alternative heads due to my blunder got me in a foul mood.

On the plus side the spare LS3 intake acquired as a surprise for my intake test thread may be useful to this build instead sitting on the coffee table in the living room as "a redneck work of modern artwork" to annoy the girlfriend. Maybe I should move the car parts before I end up sleeping in the TA instead of rebuilding the car...wink...morning humor.




Sxc z28 & Post64 - I will talk with Jeremy @ RPM about the RST vs RXT - thank you for the heads up.

Blk02SS - agreed 100% on head comments at heart, but Mast Web page says the medium bore LS7's are sold out.

AR Shale Targa - thank you for the tip on the Mamo top end. With the 62 cc chambers they will have too much compression for my short block unless the car is on race gas or E85.


Looks like I need a cylinder head with about 74 cc chamber. The milled ~ 61-62 cc GMPP's ended up at like 13.5 to 1
We could open the chambers up some and maybe get to 12.5 to 1

Summit compression calculator yielded these results

What the limit on compression for 93 Octane gas for a full weight TA?

My 72 Vette runs 10.85 to 1 compression with a carb on 93 just fine. Iron Dart 400 Aluminum Dart Pro 1 heads & intske. Cam is spec'd accordingly. My LS RS runs 11.3 to 1 no issues. i see other run LS motors ~ 11.5 to 11.8

I think the bigger 4.070 bore and domed pistons are more prone to detonation than a 3.9 bore with flat tops at the same given compression.

317's might work...

Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 04-14-2017 at 06:28 AM.
Old 04-14-2017, 07:45 AM
  #63  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Darth_V8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: My own internal universe
Posts: 10,446
Received 1,838 Likes on 1,146 Posts
Default

Threads are starting to blend together, so I apologize if this is a repost. If I were building your engine for my car, I would use the mamo 250 heads if we are talking cathedral.

If I was going rectangle, I would use the mast 260cc runner rectangle port heads. They are smaller than the LS3 stock runners AND outflow them. Explosive power. I would still send them to mamo to be hand worked over, since he just knows how to extract flow so well.

I know it's money, and I know it's expensive. I'm just the type of person who isn't satisfied if I know I left something on the table. Anyway, whatever you decide to do Im sure the motor will be phenomenal!
Old 04-14-2017, 07:48 AM
  #64  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
Looks like I need a cylinder head with about 74 cc chamber. The milled ~ 61-62 cc GMPP's ended up at like 13.5 to 1
We could open the chambers up some and maybe get to 12.5 to 1

Summit compression calculator yielded these results

What the limit on compression for 93 Octane gas for a full weight TA?

My 72 Vette runs 10.85 to 1 compression with a carb on 93 just fine. Iron Dart 400 Aluminum Dart Pro 1 heads & intske. Cam is spec'd accordingly. My LS RS runs 11.3 to 1 no issues. i see other run LS motors ~ 11.5 to 11.8

I think the bigger 4.070 bore and domed pistons are more prone to detonation than a 3.9 bore with flat tops at the same given compression.

317's might work...
You might want to double check your numbers. If I'm not mistaken, ERL uses Wiseco pistons and they don't make a 3cc domed piston for a 416. They do make a piston with a 3cc valve relief, which is expressed as -3cc in their catalog.

Scroll down to page 15:

http://wiseco.com/Catalogs/Automotive/AB17Full-Web.pdf
Old 04-14-2017, 09:13 AM
  #65  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

I might look at the SPS Haymaker LS3 heads. 264cc runner but a 2.125" valve... and flow 375cfm. They avg a C/D of 105 which is on par with TFS 245s. Which are the highest Coefficient of Discharge heads out there right now.

The formula for coefficient of discharge is as follows: C/D=airflow/curtain area. Curtain area=valve diameter x Pi x Lift.

A comparison of heads I put together this morning:

Avg C/D
101.48 TEA 255
106.42 TFS 235
106.57 TFS 245
101.48 TEA St2
103.52 MMS 235
104.94 SPS Hay
101.01 MAST 255
102.61 MAST 240
103.18 Ai Dart
107.96 MAST 285

Last edited by JakeFusion; 04-14-2017 at 09:42 AM.
Old 04-14-2017, 03:36 PM
  #66  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 153 Likes on 105 Posts

Default

Ls3 heads are A ok
Old 04-15-2017, 07:30 AM
  #67  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
You might want to double check your numbers. If I'm not mistaken, ERL uses Wiseco pistons and they don't make a 3cc domed piston for a 416. They do make a piston with a 3cc valve relief, which is expressed as -3cc in their catalog.

Scroll down to page 15:

http://wiseco.com/Catalogs/Automotive/AB17Full-Web.pdf
Thank you I will check. The screen shot of the compression calculator was provided by the cylinder head shop.

The screen shot of the short block build sheet is on another device and I'm out of town. I will post the build sheet Monday. ERL is A+ with documentaction!
Here's the basic info.




I think based on memory, this is the piston used.

Wiseco K464X7 Chevy LS Series -3cc Dome 4.070 inch Bore Piston on a few sites
​​​Summit lists it as a +3 dome.


So there may be some confusion about this "dome" when meaning -3cc or +3cc

Thank you again for pointing me at Wiseco's page.

Jake, thanks for the Haymarket info...sweet!

Everyone, thank you for head suggestions and I'm looking and reading.

Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 04-15-2017 at 07:54 AM.
Old 04-15-2017, 09:56 AM
  #68  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,689
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

This 4.070 piston has a 3cc dome. The 3cc are the extra material above and beyond the valve relief volume, that's how I would explain it. The manufacture calls it dome volume, it can be confusing when using the on line calculators and the -/+ selection.
Attached Thumbnails 99TA - 416 build - Stolen, damaged and getting repaired-20170415_074240.jpg  

Last edited by 64post; 04-15-2017 at 10:41 AM.
Old 04-15-2017, 03:37 PM
  #69  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

Use -3cc for calculation. The valve reliefs displace more volume than the dome on those pistons.

I think Wiseco calls them a reverse dome since they actually end up removing material from them. Even some of the blower dish pistons are reverse dome since they add material about the piston to help with quench and flame travel but have more material removed to create the "dish."
Old 04-15-2017, 04:02 PM
  #70  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

So the "-3cc" dome means in this particular case:

A) 74cc chamber -3cc = 71cc chamber that is smaller chamber and more compression or

B) 74cc chamber reduce compression by -3cc as in
74cc - -3cc = 77cc compression and an overall reduction in compression
Old 04-15-2017, 04:29 PM
  #71  
Super Hulk Smash
iTrader: (7)
 
JakeFusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 11,255
Received 138 Likes on 115 Posts

Default

B.

It will reduce compression.
Old 04-15-2017, 05:48 PM
  #72  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99 Black Bird T/A
So the "-3cc" dome means in this particular case:

A) 74cc chamber -3cc = 71cc chamber that is smaller chamber and more compression or

B) 74cc chamber reduce compression by -3cc as in
74cc - -3cc = 77cc compression and an overall reduction in compression
If you look at the Wiseco catalog, you will see on page 15 that the 5cc piston results in a higher compression ratio than the -3cc, then the -8cc piston results in even lower compression. That should confirm that the negative values should be calculated as dish volumes and the positive values like dome volumes.
Old 04-15-2017, 09:03 PM
  #73  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
If you look at the Wiseco catalog, you will see on page 15 that the 5cc piston results in a higher compression ratio than the -3cc, then the -8cc piston results in even lower compression. That should confirm that the negative values should be calculated as dish volumes and the positive values like dome volumes.
Yes, I read that and I appreciate the detailed explanation.

I need to be absolutely sure I have the correct understanding before talking to the person reworking the heads and discuss this dome is a defacto dish.

The current LPE GMPP heads may work after all.
Old 04-15-2017, 10:40 PM
  #74  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,689
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

Yes but, the compression calculators on line say to use ( -) to input how much dome is used and a positive + or just the amount without + to input the dish volume on the crown of the piston and that's what's confusing to many. This one does not give that instruction but will not be accurate without adding (-) to piston head volume to describe dome. Got that?
https://www.uempistons.com/index.php...tors&type=comp
Old 04-15-2017, 10:59 PM
  #75  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,689
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

99, your pistons are not domed according to Wiseco website, they have 3cc of valve relief volume, a flat top piston?

Last edited by 64post; 04-16-2017 at 07:56 AM.
Old 04-17-2017, 02:47 PM
  #76  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

I think the key source of confusion is the ERL build sheet. It says domed pistons but the Wiseco part number is for a 3 cc relief piston.

The piston is shaped sort of like this "~" with raise dome one side and valve relief on the other and adds 3 cc of volume to the chamber.

I think the LPE ported GMPP style heads may work out after all but have to confirm with the cylinder head shop.






ERL build sheet for my engine
Old 04-17-2017, 07:57 PM
  #77  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
64post's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sonoma Co. Ca.
Posts: 1,689
Received 226 Likes on 179 Posts

Default

You should call Wiseco''s tech and have them explain your part number, then there's no confusion. It does look like it has some extra material on top but just enough to keep the relief volume at 3cc instead of 4.5 or 5cc like some.
Old 04-18-2017, 08:15 AM
  #78  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 64post
You should call Wiseco''s tech and have them explain your part number, then there's no confusion. It does look like it has some extra material on top but just enough to keep the relief volume at 3cc instead of 4.5 or 5cc like some.
THIS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
that tiny little bump does not contain enough material to fill in the 6cc valve reliefs
Old 04-18-2017, 04:02 PM
  #79  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
99 Black Bird T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,590
Received 1,443 Likes on 1,001 Posts

Default

Yes indeed.

I called Wiseco today. That was an excellent suggestion. Thank you 64Post.

It appears my cathedral heads will be borderline for 93 octane with high compression at ~11.8

The head porter is researching in detail.

It appears the quench will get jacked up or other compromises occur with opening the chambers enough to drop the compression .

This engine part of the build is dead in the water until a final review by Land Speed

LPE LS2 403 short block with pistons matched to these heads would have been smarter choice for this build and less frustrating in hindsight.

This ERL 416 may end up as Black Mamba solid roller LLSR cam engine.
These are the first solid rollers I've seen that I think might last 100,000 miles on the street. Not having to buy a fast intake has me thinking about that.

Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; 04-18-2017 at 04:11 PM.
Old 04-18-2017, 05:25 PM
  #80  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
A.R. Shale Targa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Fredonia,WI
Posts: 3,729
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Should be able to run at least a mid 240s LLSR intake lobe and still have quite driveable street manners with the cathedrals and 11.8


Quick Reply: 99TA - 416 build - Stolen, damaged and getting repaired



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.