Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Yella Terra Ultra-Light results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2007 | 03:51 PM
  #1  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default New final number on my setup and Yella Terra Ultra-Light results

I have been having fun going back to the dyno after each mod. I expected the rockers to show no gains, except maybe 1 or 2 hp which is not really measureable, just got them for reliability.

People have been asking the question a lot around here, so I went back with that being the only change. Preload was set to the same as before as well. Fueling was also the same.

5 hp from about 5400 and up



Here is what I ended up with, just played around with some fueling and timing, now that I finally had some time to mess with it. Only thing left is to get the fueling leaner at 4200 to get that dip to a minimum.

480 rwhp
437 rwtq



No smoothing on graphs to take out false peaks at the end of the run.

Last edited by WS6FirebirdTA00; May 19, 2007 at 04:53 PM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 05:17 PM
  #2  
BLK02TA's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Fort Knox, KY
Default

Not bad. So what else is the benefit? Quicker rev or anything?
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #3  
30th t/a's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,166
Likes: 26
From: Butler, PA
Default

awesome! thats more than I would expect too.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 05:23 PM
  #4  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

Yeah, I figured less deflection and roller tip would be the only advantage, and that it would not have helped that much. I will take 5 hp from a reliability mod! haha
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #5  
Patrick G's Avatar
LS1 Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,246
Likes: 34
From: Victoria, TX
Default

Great info Mike. Can't wait 'til my new mods are installed! Nice report. Glad you gained power.
__________________

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.

Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #6  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

Thanks man, I am anxious on your results, as you already know lol
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #7  
tbird31's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 22
From: Huntersville, NC
Default

...****'s weak...
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #8  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by tbird31
...****'s weak...
your hair is pretty lol
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #9  
tbird31's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 22
From: Huntersville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
your hair is pretty lol
preciate it lol
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #10  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

haha

ok back to the topic lol
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #11  
HOSS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Default

congrats Mike. Those numbers are crazy, especially for the conservative dyno.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #12  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

thanks man, between that and the 13/15 loss from the rear (22 ft lbs loss at 3000 rpm), this little cam is doing pretty damn good for me

Last edited by WS6FirebirdTA00; May 19, 2007 at 09:31 PM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #13  
LowBird's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Mass
Default

looks like my next purchase will be rockers.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #14  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by BLK02TA
Not bad. So what else is the benefit? Quicker rev or anything?
They are more rigid, so you get less deflection (which I cannot say that the stockers even do deflect, just an assumption based on the design), they have roller tips, and from what I hear, I dont have to worry about losing the needle bearings and finding them in my motor lol So pretty much, better valve train stability.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:36 PM
  #15  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

Also, forgot to add that they are 1.7's as well, so stock ratio
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #16  
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
Flow Wizard
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
They are more rigid, so you get less deflection (which I cannot say that the stockers even do deflect, just an assumption based on the design), they have roller tips, and from what I hear, I dont have to worry about losing the needle bearings and finding them in my motor lol So pretty much, better valve train stability.
All of the above is true hence the additional power gain.....some of it simply from reduced friction at the higher RPM's.

Good info Mike.....way to do some real R&D of late.

And its nice to make some more power in addition to adding some reliability. While I haven't had the time to do my own independent test similar to yours, I had a hunch they would be worth a few ponies.

Cheers,
Tony
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 11:54 PM
  #17  
qwikz28's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 2
From: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Question

Originally Posted by WS6FirebirdTA00
thanks man, between that and the 13/15 loss from the rear (22 ft lbs loss at 3000 rpm), this little cam is doing pretty damn good for me
interesting that you are dynoing between mods. i think thats a great idea. what rear did you have before?
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 01:07 AM
  #18  
Dip Stick's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
From: Henderson, NC
Default

what kind did you get? get em from a sponsor?
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 07:43 AM
  #19  
The Dragon's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Florida
Thumbs up

These were the 6645's correct?

It's not surprising the gain yielded; I expected as much if not a tad more.

Less friction and better design, as Tony and others already stated, would naturally lead to less parasitic loss; hence the 5 pony gain

I can't WAIT to put mine in now
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 07:45 AM
  #20  
WS6FirebirdTA00's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,319
Likes: 1
From: North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
All of the above is true hence the additional power gain.....some of it simply from reduced friction at the higher RPM's.

Good info Mike.....way to do some real R&D of late.

And its nice to make some more power in addition to adding some reliability. While I haven't had the time to do my own independent test similar to yours, I had a hunch they would be worth a few ponies.

Cheers,
Tony
Yeah you were about dead on with what you though I would gain when we talked haha Tony is the man

I wanted to go in assuming nothing, so either way I would be happy
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 AM.