Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Gen 2 on3 7675

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2018, 05:23 PM
  #1  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Gen 2 on3 7675

Well, my turbo gave up the fight 2 days ago (On3 7875). Was going to just rebuild it and let it ride, but then find out about the On3 Gen 2 unit. Says its good for a little over 1krwhp, anyone here have any experience with this unit? And is the compressor cover the same size as the Gen 1 unit? I ask because the compressor cover is very important aside don't have anymore room before i hit the radiator. I would call, but they are closed....kinda excited about this new turbo.
Old 06-16-2018, 08:23 PM
  #2  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
C5_Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington TWP, NJ
Posts: 789
Received 167 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Do they list anywhere the full specs on this?
Old 06-16-2018, 08:28 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C5_Pete
Do they list anywhere the full specs on this?
Their website, no mention about compressor cover being same dimensions as Gen 1 though.
Old 06-16-2018, 08:34 PM
  #4  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
C5_Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington TWP, NJ
Posts: 789
Received 167 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Yeh, I went to the website, but it wasn’t very specific.

Good luck with it! Seems like it has potential.
Old 06-16-2018, 08:39 PM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C5_Pete
Yeh, I went to the website, but it wasn’t very specific.

Good luck with it! Seems like it has potential.
Agreed, not much info. Would be nice if they had something with more turbine but was still a 3 inch turbine/ downpipe exit, so this 6.0 could really cut loose. But i would settle for this, although hard....because I can get the rebuilt center for under $300 for the Gen 1.
Old 06-16-2018, 09:41 PM
  #6  
7 Second Club
 
ls3fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 665
Received 115 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

have you looked at the 79/78 from vs racing it has a 78mm turbine with a 1.15ar t4 and a 4" v band
Old 06-16-2018, 09:49 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
MY_2K_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

What about the 8883, the exhaust side would need a little work but the compressor side looks to be the same size.
Old 06-16-2018, 10:19 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls3fox
have you looked at the 79/78 from vs racing it has a 78mm turbine with a 1.15ar t4 and a 4" v band
Not downing the product, but is a bit price prohibitive for me.

Originally Posted by MY_2K_Z
What about the 8883, the exhaust side would need a little work but the compressor side looks to be the same size.
This is doable, although I really don't want to pull the downpipe to re flange. I just got done studying it, and I just might be able to get it off without pulling the radiator. That would be primo.
Old 06-17-2018, 12:06 PM
  #9  
Turbo Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
RICE ETR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you are talking about the BMF, a guy local to me made 742rwhp through a TH400, built 5.3, lil John cam and I think 25lbs of boost...using a Huron speed kit.
I think the only comments were it spooled stupid fast (as in too fast and not rod friendly) and seemed to take a lot of boost to make power. He may be on this forum and able to give you more info.
Old 06-17-2018, 12:13 PM
  #10  
Turbo Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
RICE ETR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Oh and the power did carry to 6800-7k where he left I off I believe. Car went bottom 9's at 147ish I think. It's a full weight fbody with cage, chute, etc.
edit it's an ON3 kit. No times in this video but I think he is on the limiter up top due to rear gears.
Old 06-17-2018, 12:21 PM
  #11  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
C5_Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington TWP, NJ
Posts: 789
Received 167 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Well, that’s disappointing.

I’d think a well built 5.3 and 25psi should be in the neighborhood of 1000+ with something call a BMF Billet 76


of course, there’s a lot of variables to consider.
Old 06-17-2018, 01:00 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RICE ETR
If you are talking about the BMF, a guy local to me made 742rwhp through a TH400, built 5.3, lil John cam and I think 25lbs of boost...using a Huron speed kit.
I think the only comments were it spooled stupid fast (as in too fast and not rod friendly) and seemed to take a lot of boost to make power. He may be on this forum and able to give you more info.
Hmmm, that does seem a bit high (boost wise) for the power. But then again, I guess there are other things to consider, timing, DA, so on and so forth. But after seeing this vid, I wonder if it would be worth it. I've got decent rods, so the quick spool up doesn't scare me to much. Need to get out there and pull the old unit to see if i can pull the downpipe without pulling the radiator, but this heat is brutal.
Old 06-17-2018, 01:04 PM
  #13  
Turbo Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
RICE ETR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Let me see if I can get the exact details, don't want to lead anyone wrong.
The dyno was through an unlocked 400 & ET Street R's, so his weight and mph matter most, which I am also unsure of the most lol.
The fact that it carried the power to the limiter with that turbine says to me it's working, just maybe not as efficiently as we'd like to see.
Old 06-17-2018, 01:15 PM
  #14  
Turbo Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
RICE ETR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

9.2@ 148, 3750lbs, 24-25 lbs.
My old-age-itis is showing through
Old 06-17-2018, 03:14 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RICE ETR
9.2@ 148, 3750lbs, 24-25 lbs.
My old-age-itis is showing through
Man, that car is nearly identical to mine. Weighs the same, same trans, same tires, same power. His is just faster lol.
Old 06-17-2018, 03:17 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
MY_2K_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,140
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

That's also on a 5.3 where the 75mm turbine is better suited. I'd seriously try to find a turbo with a better suited turbine for a 6.0 I'm sure the back pressure at 20 psi is unreal and killing the power up top. I know I can feel the power nosing over on mine around 5800.
Old 06-17-2018, 05:59 PM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
C5_Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington TWP, NJ
Posts: 789
Received 167 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Well, that sounds better.
9.2@148 at 3750 is a lot more than 750hp.

Old 06-17-2018, 06:23 PM
  #18  
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 46 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C5_Pete
Well, that sounds better.
9.2@148 at 3750 is a lot more than 750hp.

Not necessarily, I've watched another f body run 9 teens @149.... showed 735whp on the dyno. My car doesn't make 750 either, but leaving in boost, I think it would get close on the trap.
Old 06-17-2018, 09:54 PM
  #19  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,722
Received 283 Likes on 187 Posts

Default

A 7675 that is good for over 1000 rwhp on an LS? Nope, not unless it's one of those happy dynos that's for sure. Only 76 that will do that is a fancy new Gen2 GTX Garrett or a cut down race class spec 76mm, both of which are 3 times the price and for good reason.
Old 06-18-2018, 05:41 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The cover is bigger on the Gen2. 3” outlet instead of 2.5”. It’s also double the price of the 78/75. I’ve thought about getting one. Doesn’t seem worth it at all though. I’m either going to stick with the 78 switch to a bigger single or go twins. I’m pretty sure the Gen2 would fit though. I bet the dimensions are really similar to a pte gets/cea.


Quick Reply: Gen 2 on3 7675



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.