Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Twin S257sxe turbos on a 5.3....?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2019, 12:33 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Twin S257sxe turbos on a 5.3....?

Hey guys, trying to find out what two BW S257sxe's would make on a forged 5.3 with stock 243 heads and LJMS stage 2 turbo cam. Would it make 800hp crank? Lots of info on that turbo with 4 bangers but can't find good info as a twin V8. Thanks! T
Old 01-07-2019, 12:56 PM
  #2  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 104 Likes on 87 Posts
Default

Yes, I've made 800 crank on smaller twins, but with a more appropriate camshaft to match.
Old 01-07-2019, 01:06 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
ALL ULL C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 393
Received 55 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

I've had a discussion with AGP using these turbo's on my next project and feel like they will be more than enough to meet your goal. Their base kit uses 54/57 (T3/ .63AR) and state up to 800whp granted that's based on a 6.2L. I was in between using the 252's or 257's (T4/.63AR) and looking to be somewhere in the 600-700whp range with a 6.0 which I believe should not be a stretch by any means. I'm hoping that if need be, an exhaust housing change to the .82 will allow for more power later down the road if I'm not happy where it ends up.

You are right though, for whatever reason these turbos seem to be uncommon?
Old 01-07-2019, 01:42 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Ok great....Thanks Joe and All!
Old 01-07-2019, 01:45 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
transam69230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I'd jump up to s366 units personally, you will get bored of 800 crank which is only like 640rwhp through an auto.
Old 01-07-2019, 08:14 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (28)
 
slowlsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Deer park
Posts: 2,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree or even the billet s362's. Those will light very fast on ur combo and still be enough for 1k
Old 01-08-2019, 07:02 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I had S251s on a 6.0 and made 740whp/810wtq at 16psi. They are much smaller than S257s, those should very easily make 1100 chp on a 5.3. I have them on my L33 and they are very responsive. I had S360s on a 6.0 and they weren't nearly as responsive. If you get them order them from AGP and get .63 or .82 open housings, the S200 turbine housings from BW are pretty crappy.
Old 01-08-2019, 08:46 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thanks Hank! good info.....I'll check out the AGP housings.
Old 01-09-2019, 07:50 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Do any of you know if the AGP double v-band (inlet and outlet) housing works well?
Old 01-09-2019, 08:03 AM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
ALL ULL C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 393
Received 55 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hank Peabody
I had S251s on a 6.0 and made 740whp/810wtq at 16psi. They are much smaller than S257s, those should very easily make 1100 chp on a 5.3. I have them on my L33 and they are very responsive. I had S360s on a 6.0 and they weren't nearly as responsive. If you get them order them from AGP and get .63 or .82 open housings, the S200 turbine housings from BW are pretty crappy.
Glad he pulled you out of the wood work as those are impressive results on that setup and reassures me I'm going in the right direction.

Those are small turbos in comparison:
S251 - 47lbs./min
S252sxe - 55lbs./min
S257sxe - 65lbs./min
S362sxe - 76lbs./min

What AR housings were/are you using on the 251's? Also curious on the basic rundown of the 6.0 engine if you don't mind.
Old 01-09-2019, 01:11 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The BW MatchBot looks good for these turbo's on a 5.3.
I'm not sure how to configure for the turbine side so i didn't modify that portion.
http://www.turbos.bwauto.com//afterm...6_wrsin=92044&
Old 01-10-2019, 11:38 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Hank Peabody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Abilene TX
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ALL ULL C
Glad he pulled you out of the wood work as those are impressive results on that setup and reassures me I'm going in the right direction.

Those are small turbos in comparison:
S251 - 47lbs./min
S252sxe - 55lbs./min
S257sxe - 65lbs./min
S362sxe - 76lbs./min

What AR housings were/are you using on the 251's? Also curious on the basic rundown of the 6.0 engine if you don't mind.
Hi, I tried .48 and .63 AGP housings, the .63 responded as well as the .48, within 100rpm spool time, so no reason for .48s. I moved the .63 housings to my S257s
when I got them and put the .48s on the left over S251s, now sitting on a shelf, not sure what to do with them! The engine was a LQ4 6.0 short block and LY6
heads (LS3 heads with heavier valves). LS3 intake and XER273 cam, dual springs, mostly standard everything else.

I now have a 5.3 L33 that I had a PT7675 on, that worked great, then sucked part of a coupler into the wheel and destroyed it. I put the S257s on it, thinking they
would be a lot less responsive, but they are about the same as the PT7675, and then compressors flow a bit more, and the turbines flow a lot more, so a win win win (Michael Scott wins too),
except the destroyed PT7675.
Old 01-18-2019, 11:11 AM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thanks again for the good info Hank!
Do any of you know if the AGP double v-band (inlet and outlet) housing work just as well as the normal AGP T3 .82 housings? It would be easier for me to package if they work well. Thanks T
Old 01-18-2019, 10:38 PM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
V8sounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

The housings will act similarly given they are a similar A/r.

just some further info, I had a set of s257sxe turbos with the .82 t3 housing. Previous owner made 1040whp on an ls3 headed 370. Through a tr6060 and zl1 diff on a 5th gen camaro.
Old 01-19-2019, 07:43 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Hey V8, cool....i'll get the double v-banded exh housings. Looks like i'm set on the S257sxe turbo's as everything has come back positive on quick spool and 1k+ HP potential. Thanks guys!
Old 01-25-2019, 08:34 AM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
C5_Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington TWP, NJ
Posts: 789
Received 167 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Oh man, Tracy... what are you up to now? lol.
Old 01-25-2019, 09:15 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
slowride's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Hartford, IA
Posts: 843
Received 79 Likes on 68 Posts

Default

I made 1012 STD/ 972 uncorrected at 19 psi on a 383 based engine on my v band .82 on some cheap old cast 6265 turbonetics in a manual vette with c6 z diff/trans. These were basically the PTE style housings, but they are not tapped out till about 1200whp on a manual trans and lower cube engine IMHO.
Old 01-25-2019, 11:25 AM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
TracyRR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by C5_Pete
Oh man, Tracy... what are you up to now? lol.
Hey pete! I have projectitis, lol.....! My boat is begging for a couple of these motors and four turbo's..... :-) One motor is just about done....time for turbo's

Thank slowride!
Old 01-26-2019, 09:16 AM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
C5_Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Washington TWP, NJ
Posts: 789
Received 167 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

Now, that sounds like fun!
Old 01-28-2019, 02:03 AM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
 
Bazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 332
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by V8sounds

just some further info, I had a set of s257sxe turbos with the .82 t3 housing. Previous owner made 1040whp on an ls3 headed 370. Through a tr6060 and zl1 diff on a 5th gen camaro.
That is getting it done. I can imagine the TQ curve would be epic compared to the 1000rwhp big turbo cars that come in so much later




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:43 PM.