Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Choosing Cam

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2024, 11:14 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LSpann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 18
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Choosing Cam

Hello I am in the process of building a gen 3 5.3. I have completed installing the main bearings,rod bearings and rings. Now I am trying to decide which cam to go with. The heads I am using are the 706s.I have been looking to a ebay cam called the sloppy mechanic cam stage 2. What are the pros and cons of running a big cam. I know the kit comes with different springs and seals. I planned on having AC/Power brakes
Old 06-12-2024, 11:20 AM
  #2  
Launching!
 
Codys89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Duluth, Minnesota
Posts: 254
Received 71 Likes on 53 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LSpann
Hello I am in the process of building a gen 3 5.3. I have completed installing the main bearings,rod bearings and rings. Now I am trying to decide which cam to go with. The heads I am using are the 706s.I have been looking to a ebay cam called the sloppy mechanic cam stage 2. What are the pros and cons of running a big cam. I know the kit comes with different springs and seals. I planned on having AC/Power brakes
Are you running boost or NA?

I am procharged and have a Bald Eagle Boost Cam and am planning on switching to that cam but boost version.
Cons you gotta upgrade the valvetrain and top end with it.
When I did my cam I upgraded all the way through my injectors.

If you get the right cam it can really open the motor up and put down power. My setup the current cam did not do that for me.
Old 06-12-2024, 01:14 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LSpann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 18
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

NA right now. I gapped the top and middle ring .022 -.026.

The sloppy mechanic cam I looking at comes with the springs,cam, and valve seals. The ad didnt mention if the rocker arms or push rods needed to be replaced.
Old 06-12-2024, 08:09 PM
  #4  
Launching!
 
Jake Wade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 281
Received 111 Likes on 75 Posts

Default

What vehicle? How do you plan to use the vehicle? Gear? Converter?
Old 06-12-2024, 08:24 PM
  #5  
Abs
Staging Lane
 
Abs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Franconia, PA
Posts: 85
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

^^^^This. Also the Summit 8720 outperformed the sloppy stage 2 in richard holdener's dyno tests in a 4.8L. Depending on the vehicle (car, truck, goals, etc) I would recommend that instead.

8720 specs: 218/227, .600, .600, 112+2

The following 2 users liked this post by Abs:
G Atsma (06-13-2024), LSpann (06-26-2024)
Old 06-13-2024, 09:35 AM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LSpann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 18
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This will be going into an G-body 81 Monte Carlo. Currently has a 305/700r4. Not sure what the gears are im guessing the 2.xx since it came with a v6. Will mostly be driven on the streets.

Old 06-13-2024, 10:18 AM
  #7  
Abs
Staging Lane
 
Abs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: Franconia, PA
Posts: 85
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I'll stick with my 8720 recommendation for this 5.3
The following users liked this post:
LSpann (06-25-2024)
Old 06-13-2024, 10:58 AM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LSpann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 18
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i'll add the 8720 onto my wish list however this cam is a more expensive. Can you run AC when you go with bigger cams/ power brakes?
Old 06-13-2024, 02:10 PM
  #9  
Launching!
 
IGN-1A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 82 Posts
Default Camshaft C/L

Hi, yes 224/232 .580"/,560" sounds good but on a 116 C/L.
Lance
The following users liked this post:
LSpann (06-25-2024)
Old 06-14-2024, 12:09 PM
  #10  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,805
Received 608 Likes on 481 Posts

Default

If it has 2.xx gears in it, you really need to change them out. My old '85 Monte Carlo had 2.29 gears from the factory and it was an absolute pig on the street. Just going to a 3.42 from a 2.29 dropped over 1 second 0-60. Adding a cam that will kill a bit of low end torque will make it even slower off the line.
The following users liked this post:
LSpann (06-25-2024)
Old 06-14-2024, 12:32 PM
  #11  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
Summitracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ohio, Georgia, Nevada, Texas
Posts: 2,027
Received 1,238 Likes on 666 Posts

Default

OP,

We could see going with the SUM-8720R1 that @Abs suggested. Specs on it are .600/.600, 218/227, 112+2 with -1* of overlap. You can expect a smooth to noticeable idle depending on the idle speed. This will be great in the mid-range with a good top-end. Pair it with our .600" lift beehives and it'll be happy out to 6,500+. It's the largest we recommend with a stock torque converter.

The SUM-8728R1 might be another one to look at. Specs on it are .600/.585, 212/218, 110+3 with -5* of overlap. If this has some 2.XX gears this is the one we'd look at. It shifts the powerband to the left for better low-end and mid-range power/tq. The intake valve closing (IVC) is basically what sets the powerband. The earlier we close the intake valve ABDC the earlier the powerband typically starts and ends. The 8728R1 has a 33* IVC @.050" VS. 39* for the 8720R1. The 8728R1 has a steady lope and will make great torque from 2,000 on up. It'll pull well to 6,500+ with the above .600" lift beehives.

Here's a good video of different ways to identify what gear ratio you have.

__________________


800-230-3030
www.SummitRacing.com
The following 2 users liked this post by Summitracing:
Abs (06-16-2024), LSpann (06-25-2024)
Old 06-22-2024, 04:34 PM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
 
68Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 744
Received 390 Likes on 266 Posts

Default

Difference between a genuine SS2 (Elgin 1840P) and the Summit should be <$70. If it's cheaper then it's a fake; questionable in quality, likely not even actually ground to the state specs, and it plus any components that come with it could damage your engine long term. eBay is rampant with these fakes and Amazon not much better.

Whether real or not, choosing a cam that isn't the best fit for your setup will be disappointing in the end. With all the money and effort spent do it once, do it right.

Last edited by 68Formula; 06-22-2024 at 04:43 PM.
The following 3 users liked this post by 68Formula:
Abs (06-23-2024), Bob570 (06-22-2024), LSpann (06-26-2024)
Old 06-24-2024, 06:34 PM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LSpann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 18
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would it be smarter for me to get car running with a stock cam? Im planning on using stand alone harness and maybe a ECM from a tahoe/silverado and get everything wired up would the engine run with the modified cam or would I need to get the computer tuned before the engine runs?



Last edited by LSpann; 06-24-2024 at 06:52 PM.
Old 06-25-2024, 04:17 AM
  #14  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,805
Received 608 Likes on 481 Posts

Default

If it were me, I'd put the cam in first and send the ECM off to a mail order tuner. With the amount of work it takes to swap a cam in the car, it doesn't make sense to wait. A mail order tune is going to run you like $300 at most. You're not building something that is uncommon, engine-wise, so any mail order tuner should be able to get pretty close with the tune.
The following users liked this post:
LSpann (06-25-2024)
Old 08-07-2024, 09:22 PM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LSpann's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 18
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was planning on running fuel injection with my current build but I see in order for my 700r4 to work I would need a car carb due to the pressure cable the 700r4 has. Most of the standalone harnesses I see require the 4l60e and up so I will be swapping the trans to the 4l60 or better. As for gears I was aiming for 3.73s. Would the summit 8270 still be a good choice?? I was wanting to change the stall too but not sure how high I should go.

Old 08-08-2024, 07:07 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
grinder11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan & Florida
Posts: 2,301
Received 1,155 Likes on 805 Posts

Default

3,200 Yank ftw......



Quick Reply: Choosing Cam



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.