Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

6.0 Heads On A Stock 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2004 | 04:31 PM
  #1  
IMD's Avatar
IMD
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default 6.0 Heads On A Stock 5.3?

what kind of compression ratio would that yeild? im looking to build an efficient/budget turbo motor.

thanks.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2004 | 05:26 PM
  #2  
jerflash's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 10
From: long island, ny
Default

i think in the realm of 8.5 which is perfect for a turbo motor
but dont quote me
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,343
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

I think it's closer to 9.1:1, but I would love to be shown some math saying exactly what it is.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 01:28 AM
  #4  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

What vehicle is this going in?

A full 6.0 long block might be easier to do (and make more power).

Anyway, 6.0 heads drop an LS1 to 9.6, and the drop would be a little bigger for a 5.3 because those combustion chambers are 5cc's smaller than LS1 heads (a 10cc difference going to the 6.0's).

Tell me the stock compression ratio of a 5.3 (I don't know it off hand) and I can figure it out for you.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #5  
IMD's Avatar
IMD
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by z98
What vehicle is this going in?

A full 6.0 long block might be easier to do (and make more power).

Anyway, 6.0 heads drop an LS1 to 9.6, and the drop would be a little bigger for a 5.3 because those combustion chambers are 5cc's smaller than LS1 heads (a 10cc difference going to the 6.0's).

Tell me the stock compression ratio of a 5.3 (I don't know it off hand) and I can figure it out for you.
stock on the 5.3 is 9.5. its all going in an S10. i was looking at the 5.3 because they are floating around very cheap. i think it will make plenty of power with two turbos
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #6  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,343
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

I'm gonna give you a bump since I would like to know as well.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 12:09 AM
  #7  
z98's Avatar
z98
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Default

*drumroll*

And the compression of a 5.3 motor with 6.0 heads is...

--- 8.56 ---

Thank you! Thank you!

*bows*

A set of forged pistons and rod bolts and you should be set.

How strong are the rods on 5.3's?

And yes, S10's are dirt cheap and great for a project.

Also, you should try looking at 6.0's, it wouldn't be much more money and you'd make enough power to be worth it.

And you'll have to change pistons to make any real power and keep it alive, so you can get your compression drop from your new pistons...

Oh well, just things to think about.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 12:12 AM
  #8  
jerflash's Avatar
11 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 10
From: long island, ny
Default

and the winner is me haha i called 8.5
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #9  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,343
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

How did you come up with that? I'm not saying you're wrong, I just want to know for myself how to come up with those numbers.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 12:51 AM
  #10  
IMD's Avatar
IMD
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by z98
*drumroll*

And the compression of a 5.3 motor with 6.0 heads is...

--- 8.56 ---

Thank you! Thank you!

*bows*

A set of forged pistons and rod bolts and you should be set.

How strong are the rods on 5.3's?

And yes, S10's are dirt cheap and great for a project.

Also, you should try looking at 6.0's, it wouldn't be much more money and you'd make enough power to be worth it.

And you'll have to change pistons to make any real power and keep it alive, so you can get your compression drop from your new pistons...

Oh well, just things to think about.
i think 15 psi or so on a stock 5.3 shortblock with worked 6.0 heads, ls6 intake, cam, and enough fuel, should make 500 to the wheels and live a full healthy life. id like to test the limits of the stock 5.3 bottom end....you know....for science!
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 11:48 PM
  #11  
Flyer's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,343
Likes: 0
From: Armpit of East TX
Default

Would the CR have anything to do with the size of the bore/stroke? I was thinking that would have to be plugged into the equation as well.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2004 | 12:15 AM
  #12  
P Mack's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix
Default

Yes it does. It's basically (chamber volume + displacement/8)/chamber volume. But you have to include the volume from stuff like gasket thickness, valve reliefs, and the small area above the piston rings in the chamber volume if you use that formula.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #13  
vortec_7's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

just how accurate is that calculation? did you account for the dish in the 5.3 piston? if its right, how many cc's of unshrouding would be needed for 8:1 compression?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #14  
Another_User's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Default

Mmmm....that would be nice for a blower car....I wonder how many horses you could make on a blown 5.3...
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.