Any 3rd gen Firehawks?
04-20-2006, 11:53 AM
#21
Originally Posted by jmm98LS1
I could be wrong, but I thought I read awhile back that the sticker for a the 3rd gen hawk was about the same as a corvette.
Standard Features -SLP preped 350 Engine rated at 350-bhp@5500 RPM and 390 lb-ft@4400 RPM
-17"X9.5" Ronal Rims with Firestone Firehawk SZ P275/275/40 ZR17 tires
-ZF 6 speed Transmission
-Stainless exhaust system
-A Performance Rear Axle with 3.54:1 gears
Special Firehawk bagging decals and numbered plaque A standard Firehawk comes in at $39,995, but could also be ordered with the following options, which took the price to around $51,995.
-R option $9,995
-Cross drilled 13" Brembo Ferrari F-40 Brakes
-Full roll cage minus the back seat
-Aluminum Hood but ya gotta keep the bulge!!
-Recaro racing seat with full harness by Simpson
-Recaro Seat option: $995 Adds passenger side Recaro Seat and harness
-17"X9.5" Ronal Rims with Firestone Firehawk SZ P275/275/40 ZR17 tires
-ZF 6 speed Transmission
-Stainless exhaust system
-A Performance Rear Axle with 3.54:1 gears
Special Firehawk bagging decals and numbered plaque A standard Firehawk comes in at $39,995, but could also be ordered with the following options, which took the price to around $51,995.
-R option $9,995
-Cross drilled 13" Brembo Ferrari F-40 Brakes
-Full roll cage minus the back seat
-Aluminum Hood but ya gotta keep the bulge!!
-Recaro racing seat with full harness by Simpson
-Recaro Seat option: $995 Adds passenger side Recaro Seat and harness
04-20-2006, 01:12 PM
#22
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middleburg, FL
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dammit! Dr Evyl beat me to it. That T-Ram intake was the ****. My bussy had one of the early prototypes of thos on his 86 Vette, back when it was still Hamburger performance. That intake was sick on his 383.
Anyway, I've seen one Comp R Red being driven to a car show and one blue unloaded from a trailer at a car show.
Again, this boards lack of automotive knowledge outside the 98+F/97+Y car astounds and greatly disappoints me!
Anyway, I've seen one Comp R Red being driven to a car show and one blue unloaded from a trailer at a car show.
Again, this boards lack of automotive knowledge outside the 98+F/97+Y car astounds and greatly disappoints me!
04-20-2006, 01:48 PM
#23
They had a MINT red 91 Firehawk with a few thousand miles on it for sale on ebay about a year ago. I think it went for $18,000 
If I had $18,000 to spend on a car at the time, that would have been it. I'm suprised it didn't sell for a whole lot more.
If I had $18,000 to spend on a car at the time, that would have been it. I'm suprised it didn't sell for a whole lot more.
04-20-2006, 02:26 PM
#25
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middleburg, FL
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bowtie Boy
Fastest production f-body is the ZL1 Stage 3 Camaro. Over 600+ Hp. 9.55 1/4@144mph. Nuff said.
Try 13.16@110.21 back in the day by Hi-Performance Cars.
Don't believe everything you read on the internet or hear from your dad/grandpa/etc...
They need quite a bit to get down there. I had a friend who was the original owner of one of the 4 TH400 ZL1s, and it only was in the 10s after tubbing and a good amount of weight reductiona dn suspension work.
There are a few in the 8s/9s with 300-500 N2O shots, Merlin motors etc.
And that would be quickest anyway. Fast is speed, quick is ET
04-20-2006, 02:54 PM
#26
TECH Resident
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Barbaria
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 30th TA 0219
you don't honestly believe that car went that on 35 year old technology bias ply tires do you? LOL
Try 13.16@110.21 back in the day by Hi-Performance Cars.
Try 13.16@110.21 back in the day by Hi-Performance Cars.
04-20-2006, 03:05 PM
#27
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 30th TA 0219
you don't honestly believe that car went that on 35 year old technology bias ply tires do you? LOL
Try 13.16@110.21 back in the day by Hi-Performance Cars.
Don't believe everything you read on the internet or hear from your dad/grandpa/etc...
They need quite a bit to get down there. I had a friend who was the original owner of one of the 4 TH400 ZL1s, and it only was in the 10s after tubbing and a good amount of weight reductiona dn suspension work.
There are a few in the 8s/9s with 300-500 N2O shots, Merlin motors etc.
And that would be quickest anyway. Fast is speed, quick is ET
Try 13.16@110.21 back in the day by Hi-Performance Cars.
Don't believe everything you read on the internet or hear from your dad/grandpa/etc...
They need quite a bit to get down there. I had a friend who was the original owner of one of the 4 TH400 ZL1s, and it only was in the 10s after tubbing and a good amount of weight reductiona dn suspension work.
There are a few in the 8s/9s with 300-500 N2O shots, Merlin motors etc.
And that would be quickest anyway. Fast is speed, quick is ET
04-20-2006, 03:16 PM
#28
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middleburg, FL
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wnt2Go10o
do you honestly beleive hes talking about the 69 yenko? hes talking about the fake ZL1. the 2002s. why fake? the ZL1 was the designation for the motor. the 2002 "ZL1" doesnt have a zl1 in it, has an aftermarket built c5r.
The 69 Yenko is NOT the same as the ZL1 The 1969 ZL1 was a TRUE PRODUCTION CAR. Fred Gibb was the main dealer behind the aluminum ZL1 cars. The Yenko was simply an endorsed dealer edition, COPO car, similar to the ZL1. The 2002, ZL1 stage 3, is NOT a PRODUCTION CAR.
04-21-2006, 08:28 AM
#30
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Middleburg, FL
Posts: 1,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FIREHAWK#608
This is a sad day here in the F-body community.
90% of the comments about year,model, and details blows my mind. I need a drink.
90% of the comments about year,model, and details blows my mind. I need a drink.
Having spoken to you in the past, I know you know your history!
04-24-2006, 02:36 PM
#32
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MdFormula350
Both the TTA and Firehawk were badass!! I love the 91-92 look so thats why i bought a formula and then bought the firehawk replica rims from ronal.
I was going to get a set from my friend Julian for $450 shipped (awesome price) but since I have an LS1 rear, I decided that I didn't want to go looking for another rear and some spacers. He had the Silver with black inserts and went with a powdercoated Black with silver lip.
his car with the wheels I was going to buy,
10-16-2010, 11:14 AM
#34
WOW, this was an old thread.
It was a driver's race between the TTA and Firehawk. If you knew how to launch a turbo V6, it would easily beat the Firehawk. Mine went 13.0 at MIR when mine was stock but it did have Firestone Firehawks, which were better than the Gatorbacks for sticking. 1.88-1.90 short times all day long that day. If I would have had a paper clip, I could have run 12's but it was completely stock.
Here's a pic from '01 at the 35th F-Body show at the Corvette museum. My car and the green Firehawk.
It was a driver's race between the TTA and Firehawk. If you knew how to launch a turbo V6, it would easily beat the Firehawk. Mine went 13.0 at MIR when mine was stock but it did have Firestone Firehawks, which were better than the Gatorbacks for sticking. 1.88-1.90 short times all day long that day. If I would have had a paper clip, I could have run 12's but it was completely stock.
Here's a pic from '01 at the 35th F-Body show at the Corvette museum. My car and the green Firehawk.
The following users liked this post:
TTOP350 (10-15-2021)
11-17-2010, 10:25 PM
#37
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a pic of #6, #26 (w/ aluminum Rodeck engine) and the IMSA 92 Firehawk. #13 is in the second picture behind the family truckster. I'm hoping to get all 4 cars out and take new pictures within the next couple of weeks.
BTW, the owner of #13 (i.e. the first owner) also purchased a brand new 1987 GNX. He said #13 would spank the GNX stock for stock. He also owned a 94 Viper and said #13 would stay within a half fender to the Viper thru 60mph and then the Viper would start pulling away.
BTW, the owner of #13 (i.e. the first owner) also purchased a brand new 1987 GNX. He said #13 would spank the GNX stock for stock. He also owned a 94 Viper and said #13 would stay within a half fender to the Viper thru 60mph and then the Viper would start pulling away.
Last edited by t_towner; 11-17-2010 at 10:37 PM. Reason: content
11-21-2010, 04:19 PM
#38
TECH Resident
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T Tower,
Is there any demand for a 3rd Gen SLP 2OTL Exhuast that came on the Firehawks? I bought one thinking it was from the 4th gen, come to find out its for a 3rd gen, the tail pipes have the slight bend up in them.
It sounds great on my cammed LS1 and flows great too. Since the 3rd Gen Firehawk was pretty rare, would you say the exhaust is rare as well?
Is there any demand for a 3rd Gen SLP 2OTL Exhuast that came on the Firehawks? I bought one thinking it was from the 4th gen, come to find out its for a 3rd gen, the tail pipes have the slight bend up in them.
It sounds great on my cammed LS1 and flows great too. Since the 3rd Gen Firehawk was pretty rare, would you say the exhaust is rare as well?
11-21-2010, 04:32 PM
#39
If the 2002 zl1 wasn't a production car then neither are any of the slp optioned cars as the 02 zl1 was sanctioned by GM and was NOT like the copo/yenko which were DEALER upgrades. This thread is full of fail today.. And ftr the c5r block is basically a stout ls6 block and some 01s and 02s have ls6 blocks...
