Wiring, Stereo & Electronics Audio Components | Radars | Alarms - and things that spark when they shouldn't

Understanding WinISD graph

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2009, 08:14 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
prince xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Understanding WinISD graph

I came across this thread and started playing with WinISD. What I tried doing differently is changing the parameters of the boxes to .6 to match the Subthump box. What is it I am supposed to be looking for?
Attached Thumbnails Understanding WinISD graph-winisdscreen.jpg  
Old 06-09-2009, 08:22 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
 
dragonrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You generally want it as flat as possible, and to extend as low (=to the left) as far as possible.

Note that while I advocate WinISD, it does not model distortion/sound quality, and some manufacturers (*coughedcough*) often give T/S parameters that are way off. Also, there are variances between every individual drivers. Still, it helps.
Old 06-09-2009, 09:07 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
prince xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So what does it mean when the Rockford goes above 0 around 80 hz with .5db? Does that mean that sub is going to be punchier? Does the Fi Q10 and it's long gradual slope mean it is going to play bass more accurately?

The Fi Q10 f6 is 35hz. The RF is 31.5hz. Is this going to be an audible difference? What I want is a sub that will work well in a subthump box while getting the deepest note possible.
Old 06-09-2009, 09:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
 
dragonrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The humps in the JL and Rockford means they are supposed to be in bigger boxes, though it's not too bad.

Rockford subs are not good sounding and have crap excursion, though.
Old 06-11-2009, 09:51 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
prince xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Wouldn't the SPL graph be more important since that is what you would actually hear? By looking at the the SPL chart the JL would be louder in the upper range while the Fi would be louder in the lower note range.

The Fi Q10 @ 20 hz is 94db @ 100 hz is 106.95 db
The JL 10w3 at 20 hz is 92.7db @ 100 hz is 109.97 db

Thoughts? What else should I be looking for on the Phase and Group Delay graphs?
Attached Thumbnails Understanding WinISD graph-winisd-spl-graph.jpg   Understanding WinISD graph-winisd-phase-graph.jpg   Understanding WinISD graph-winisd-group-delay-graph.jpg  
Old 06-17-2009, 08:58 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
prince xizor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Does anyone know if the SPL graph is more important that the gain graph?
Old 06-19-2009, 07:59 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
 
dragonrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The SPL graph is only good for comparing sensitivity. You need the relative graph to compare frequency response.
Old 06-19-2009, 10:27 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Lightbulb

The Group Delay graph is very useful with ported enclosures, with sealed enclosures the group delay is usually very low with little variation between subs.
Old 06-19-2009, 10:33 AM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Also I would focus more in the 30hz to 70hz freq. range .
Old 06-21-2009, 01:42 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
flak_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I recommend picking up the loudspeaker design cookbook. It's a good basic project-related "idiots guide" to building boxes. I learned all of this stuff a long time ago with that book, a copy of winISD, a truckload of MDF and a trusty Dayton Titanic MKIII.
Old 06-21-2009, 01:43 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
flak_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dragonrage
The humps in the JL and Rockford means they are supposed to be in bigger boxes, though it's not too bad.

Rockford subs are not good sounding and have crap excursion, though.
That's because they, like most companies now, put out a cheap $50 subwoofer with a $300 price tag at retail stores. If you want a good product, you look to small internet companies with a lot of passion making the best products. CSS, TC Sounds, Mach5, Incriminator, Sound Splinter, Stereo Integrity, Fi etc. RE Audio and Adire used to be good too.
Old 06-21-2009, 06:07 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
dragonrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

heh, I've recommended pretty much all of those brands myself



Quick Reply: Understanding WinISD graph



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.