99 trans am vs Roush 427
04-14-2009, 06:56 PM
#21
Teching In
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So are you saying that the auto is faster than the stick or that the times should be discredited cause it was at E-town.I was just showing that they are capable of alot more than most people can drive them to.That is all.
04-14-2009, 07:12 PM
#22
Teching In
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well if your a 99 m6 t/a you have 3.43 rear gears and.. well ill speak for us both if its stock. we pull very well on the highway due to the high rear gears. he probably has alot lower rear gears, i bet 4.10's or atleast 3.90 in the 427 stang. Either way, good job 
04-15-2009, 10:59 AM
#23
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My comment about E-town was merely that that is a great track and puts out good times. That and Atco.
04-15-2009, 11:43 AM
#24
Teching In
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What I'm saying is you posted up information on a car that is not like what hte OP is referring too. This is a stg 3, not a 427R, and it is an M5, not an auto. Stg 3s are typiclly mid high 12s
My comment about E-town was merely that that is a great track and puts out good times. That and Atco.
3.55s are stock gears for them.
My comment about E-town was merely that that is a great track and puts out good times. That and Atco.
3.55s are stock gears for them.
04-15-2009, 12:42 PM
#25
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
: bang: MY BAD.....I was thinking of the other roush thread. I'll SU and 
