BS thread/Rant, New found hate
Edit-Sarge_13
Keep the racial **** out of this site or you are gone for good.
Last edited by Sarge_13; Apr 14, 2009 at 11:02 PM.
I remember when I was younger I'd cruise past the Best Buy parking lot at night and see all these cool Mustang's and WRX's with body kits and neon lighting and thought that would be so cool to have a fast car and chill with those guys and show off my car. Now that I have my WS.6 I wouldn't dream about going there. All it is is a bunch of highschool kids with no lives trying to show people how tough they are by racing on the street and getting caught by the cops. I'll be driving and I'll see an F-body and think "Yes! Another F-body owner!" I'll haul *** and catch it and its being driven by an old lady! There's like 3 or 4 really clean 4th gens in town and they are all owned by old ladies.
I've never met anyone like me in my town who likes all kinds of cars. I love built civics and cobras and vettes or anything thats fast, problem is, people here who have a fast car stay home. Being open minded is a good thing because there are good and bad cars in every brand and they all got their pro's and con's. That's my words of wisdom for the day.

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
J/K

I have to disagree with the weaker block comment. And 'under powered' is really relative when you think about it. I mean, the foxbodies had the 3rd gens the entire time. Not only that, even the years that the chevy's were quicker/faster, the stangs weren't too far behind with lower $$ and less HP. They are simply setup differently as to how they run.
Personally, they both have come out with some serious stuff throughout the decades and I'd take that over decades of imports instead.

Don't get me wrong, I like Mustangs. I'm just recognizing which brand offers the best bang for the buck in each area; Engine, Weight, susp, rear end! Ford has a superior rear end since day one, and had the good sense to use the 8.8 while GM had the 10 bolt. SBF had Symmetrical intake ports when Chevy still had Siamese. The Fast Ford guys had great 60 ft times long before us torque arm guys did.
If your doing a analysis based on cost, Power, drivability, mod-ability and robustness on a whole vehicle, it may be a wash. Based on Engine, its about imposible to beat the latest LS engines. Either one, they are both a best bang for the buck when compared to any import.
Don't get me wrong, I like Mustangs. I'm just recognizing which brand offers the best bang for the buck in each area; Engine, Weight, susp, rear end! Ford has a superior rear end since day one, and had the good sense to use the 8.8 while GM had the 10 bolt. SBF had Symmetrical intake ports when Chevy still had Siamese. The Fast Ford guys had great 60 ft times long before us torque arm guys did.
If your doing a analysis based on cost, Power, drivability, mod-ability and robustness on a whole vehicle, it may be a wash. Based on Engine, its about imposible to beat the latest LS engines. Either one, they are both a best bang for the buck when compared to any import.
What about the Hipo289 that could spin at 8k rpms like know one's business...from teh factory. What about the factory aluminum modular blocks that are running 1000 hp and factory short blocks that are handling 800+?
I'm not saying they are better....I'm saying if you weigh out the decades, they'll be pretty even in the big picture.
You are looking at but one aspect.
What about the Hipo289 that could spin at 8k rpms like know one's business...from teh factory. What about the factory aluminum modular blocks that are running 1000 hp and factory short blocks that are handling 800+?
I'm not saying they are better....I'm saying if you weigh out the decades, they'll be pretty even in the big picture.

Once you switch to a race Ford or aftermarket block, all of these issues go away anyway.
Once you switch to a race Ford or aftermarket block, all of these issues go away anyway.
Thanks for not getting on a **** storm and keeping this civil.

IMO, all blocks have issues at one point or another....and you're never guaranteed. It's part of the 'sport'.
however, I have a lot of fun making htem look dumb and slapping them with my humble meat and potatoes. how it goes after that, is up to them. I can be cool, or continue to be an *** and make you feel stupid. LOL. IDC what you drive, I hate arrogance.
Is that local guy on SVTP.com? I might have to look him up one of these days.
And as for knowing nothing abour cars and performance......I think that is a vastly exhaggerated stereotype. Much like mullets and fbods. Plenty of guys on here that don't know much about cars too. Ask me how I know.
good to see a stang owner that isnt like this? I'd like to think a fair amount of us stang guys on LS1tech are like that.

By far the smartest thing I have read on this sight!
Most of these engines, and specifically the blocks, both sbc and sbfs are living at more than 2 times their original factory hp ratings. They were never designed around being able to handle a little more than the original factory hp numbers.
Personally speaking, I havent found any production motor that matches the power making capability and robustness of a big block Chevy, but thats a different discussion.
3600 lb, 8:71, two Big shot plates of nitrous on a 1973 2 Bolt 454.
Last edited by TT632; Apr 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM.
Most of these engines, and specifically the blocks, both sbc and sbfs are living at more than 2 times their original factory hp ratings. They were never designed around being able to handle a little more than the original factory hp numbers.
Personally speaking, I havent found any production motor that matches the power making capability and robustness of a big block Chevy, but thats a different discussion.
3600 lb, 8:71, two Big shot plates of nitrous on a 1973 2 Bolt 454.
It's one of those everyone has their own opinion and belief topics. SOme like to push, and some just like to talk.




