Wow are 09 Mustang GT's slow
10-09-2009, 01:43 AM
#41
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Navarre, Florida
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
O hey did I mention it ran .5 quicker? Not that matters to you guys, its not facts or anything. Or a fact that a 2010 Mustang GT hasn't gotten into the 12s bone stock and a Camaro has...
Whatever though! Enjoy what little ricer arguments you can come up with.
O and if you want to compare the 2010 Mustang GT base vs the Camaro SS base, yes it has it beat in the money department, but its slalom is reduced another 2mph and the skipad is reduced to .90 PER FORD. So that leaves the Mustang with what? Jack and ****.
This is with the track pack as tested by Motortrend:
The Mustang has better lateral acceleration compared to the Camaro (95 vs 90), but the Camaro has a faster slalom time (67.2 mph vs 65.2) and the Camaro has better braking despite the weight disadvantage (108 vs 107 ft). 0-60 times go to the Camaro by .3 seconds, (4.6 vs 4.9), and the Camaro pulls way ahead of the Mustang at the quarter mile mark(13.0-13.5).
Whatever though! Enjoy what little ricer arguments you can come up with.
O and if you want to compare the 2010 Mustang GT base vs the Camaro SS base, yes it has it beat in the money department, but its slalom is reduced another 2mph and the skipad is reduced to .90 PER FORD. So that leaves the Mustang with what? Jack and ****.
This is with the track pack as tested by Motortrend:
The Mustang has better lateral acceleration compared to the Camaro (95 vs 90), but the Camaro has a faster slalom time (67.2 mph vs 65.2) and the Camaro has better braking despite the weight disadvantage (108 vs 107 ft). 0-60 times go to the Camaro by .3 seconds, (4.6 vs 4.9), and the Camaro pulls way ahead of the Mustang at the quarter mile mark(13.0-13.5).
Last edited by Fatbum; 10-09-2009 at 02:22 AM.
10-09-2009, 08:56 AM
#42
The part about safety might not be true, but I was going off standard safety equipment and not the ratings. Like certain airbags the Mustang doesn't have. My bad if that was wrong. BUT,
This is all true...
and has a shittier warranty. The Camaro is even cheaper. True
Mustang GTs can't break into the 12s bone stock either. It barely outhandled the Camaro but that should be expected with that weight. True
The car also gets shittier gas mileage and has a smaller tank. The gearing ratio is better for the track and reflects that. It also weighs over 300lbs less. It better ******* handle better. True
I mean really? conjecture?
Biased? It's a better platform...period.
This is all true...
and has a shittier warranty. The Camaro is even cheaper. True
Mustang GTs can't break into the 12s bone stock either. It barely outhandled the Camaro but that should be expected with that weight. True
The car also gets shittier gas mileage and has a smaller tank. The gearing ratio is better for the track and reflects that. It also weighs over 300lbs less. It better ******* handle better. True
I mean really? conjecture?
Biased? It's a better platform...period.
I have no where else to go.
10-09-2009, 02:01 PM
#44
O hey did I mention it ran .5 quicker? Not that matters to you guys, its not facts or anything. Or a fact that a 2010 Mustang GT hasn't gotten into the 12s bone stock and a Camaro has...
Whatever though! Enjoy what little ricer arguments you can come up with.
O and if you want to compare the 2010 Mustang GT base vs the Camaro SS base, yes it has it beat in the money department, but its slalom is reduced another 2mph and the skipad is reduced to .90 PER FORD. So that leaves the Mustang with what? Jack and ****.
This is with the track pack as tested by Motortrend:
The Mustang has better lateral acceleration compared to the Camaro (95 vs 90), but the Camaro has a faster slalom time (67.2 mph vs 65.2) and the Camaro has better braking despite the weight disadvantage (108 vs 107 ft). 0-60 times go to the Camaro by .3 seconds, (4.6 vs 4.9), and the Camaro pulls way ahead of the Mustang at the quarter mile mark(13.0-13.5).
Whatever though! Enjoy what little ricer arguments you can come up with.
O and if you want to compare the 2010 Mustang GT base vs the Camaro SS base, yes it has it beat in the money department, but its slalom is reduced another 2mph and the skipad is reduced to .90 PER FORD. So that leaves the Mustang with what? Jack and ****.
This is with the track pack as tested by Motortrend:
The Mustang has better lateral acceleration compared to the Camaro (95 vs 90), but the Camaro has a faster slalom time (67.2 mph vs 65.2) and the Camaro has better braking despite the weight disadvantage (108 vs 107 ft). 0-60 times go to the Camaro by .3 seconds, (4.6 vs 4.9), and the Camaro pulls way ahead of the Mustang at the quarter mile mark(13.0-13.5).
and stfu
10-09-2009, 02:32 PM
#45
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Navarre, Florida
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Manalashi: I don't like challengers because I think their ugly. I think they are slow for what you pay for, their braking is horrible, they look like they have a lift kit, the don't handle. I think the inside looks decent, but that's about it.
10-09-2009, 04:40 PM
#49
Actually the company that made it is still around, Holden. It's not a family car either. Coming from a guy who has a POS 95 GT I don't think you have much room to talk. Your car is a slow POS. Slow stock, slow with full bolt ons, slow cammed. The fact you are talking about a 2010 Mustang being slow is bewildering. A ******* eclipse gt would burn your car. So please, go cry some more.
This car on the STOCK SHORTBLOCK went 11.4@121mph with a stock T5 and a Ford Racing King Cobra clutch. Call bullshit on me, I'd love to take a pic of the time slip with a little note next to it for you. Oh and this was on 17" wheels too with 275 MTs.
Since my car is such a slow piece of **** lets hear alittle about your car. I made 456rwhp out of a little 5.0 with an off the shelf cam. So surely your bigger motor with a custom cam makes what....600rwhp? Please teach me some stuff.
I didn't care to get this personal but obviously your *** is still alittle raw from finding out that the company that made your car is gone. So you took my little poke too seriously. And what the hell are you talking about Pontiac didn't make your car. Holden made it?
Did you go buy your car at a Holden dealership? Idiot.Point is some props were given to the 2010 Mustang and you started your bitch fit on and on and on about how the 2010 Camaro was soooo much better. Why don't you compare the 2010 Mustang to the 2010 GTO? OHHHHHHHH, so thats why your a little female. There is no GTO anymore. OOPs! Get a set of ***** and stop bitching about the new Mustang. If you don't like it, don't buy one. I'm sure no one would give a flying **** just like no one cares that you don't like it. So if you feel like you want to bitch more please take it to another thread and stop bringing your wet tampons in mine.
(Jay if anything I said was over the top feel free to edit it or close the thread when you need to. I don't have the time this weekend to go back and forth with a pissing match with this clown.)
Last edited by Stopsign32v; 10-09-2009 at 04:46 PM.
10-09-2009, 05:11 PM
#50
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is that a fact? Here is the dyno sheet of my slow 95 GT. Oh yea, and this is N/A too.
This car on the STOCK SHORTBLOCK went 11.4@121mph with a stock T5 and a Ford Racing King Cobra clutch. Call bullshit on me, I'd love to take a pic of the time slip with a little note next to it for you. Oh and this was on 17" wheels too with 275 MTs.
Since my car is such a slow piece of **** lets hear alittle about your car. I made 456rwhp out of a little 5.0 with an off the shelf cam. So surely your bigger motor with a custom cam makes what....600rwhp? Please teach me some stuff.
I didn't care to get this personal but obviously your *** is still alittle raw from finding out that the company that made your car is gone. So you took my little poke too seriously. And what the hell are you talking about Pontiac didn't make your car. Holden made it? Did you go buy your car at a Holden dealership? Idiot.
Point is some props were given to the 2010 Mustang and you started your bitch fit on and on and on about how the 2010 Camaro was soooo much better. Why don't you compare the 2010 Mustang to the 2010 GTO? OHHHHHHHH, so thats why your a little female. There is no GTO anymore. OOPs! Get a set of ***** and stop bitching about the new Mustang. If you don't like it, don't buy one. I'm sure no one would give a flying **** just like no one cares that you don't like it. So if you feel like you want to bitch more please take it to another thread and stop bringing your wet tampons in mine.
(Jay if anything I said was over the top feel free to edit it or close the thread when you need to. I don't have the time this weekend to go back and forth with a pissing match with this clown.)
This car on the STOCK SHORTBLOCK went 11.4@121mph with a stock T5 and a Ford Racing King Cobra clutch. Call bullshit on me, I'd love to take a pic of the time slip with a little note next to it for you. Oh and this was on 17" wheels too with 275 MTs.
Since my car is such a slow piece of **** lets hear alittle about your car. I made 456rwhp out of a little 5.0 with an off the shelf cam. So surely your bigger motor with a custom cam makes what....600rwhp? Please teach me some stuff.
I didn't care to get this personal but obviously your *** is still alittle raw from finding out that the company that made your car is gone. So you took my little poke too seriously. And what the hell are you talking about Pontiac didn't make your car. Holden made it?
Did you go buy your car at a Holden dealership? Idiot.Point is some props were given to the 2010 Mustang and you started your bitch fit on and on and on about how the 2010 Camaro was soooo much better. Why don't you compare the 2010 Mustang to the 2010 GTO? OHHHHHHHH, so thats why your a little female. There is no GTO anymore. OOPs! Get a set of ***** and stop bitching about the new Mustang. If you don't like it, don't buy one. I'm sure no one would give a flying **** just like no one cares that you don't like it. So if you feel like you want to bitch more please take it to another thread and stop bringing your wet tampons in mine.
(Jay if anything I said was over the top feel free to edit it or close the thread when you need to. I don't have the time this weekend to go back and forth with a pissing match with this clown.)
10-09-2009, 06:39 PM
#52
Staging Lane
Family car... please... I guess the M series BMW's are family cars too? Quick: pick which is more likely to have a baby seat in it on its way to WalMart: a Mustang GT or a GTO? Thats what I thought.
...This car on the STOCK SHORTBLOCK went 11.4@121mph with a stock T5 and a Ford Racing King Cobra clutch. Call bullshit on me, I'd love to take a pic of the time slip with a little note next to it for you. Oh and this was on 17" wheels too with 275 MTs.
Since my car is such a slow piece of **** lets hear alittle about your car. I made 456rwhp out of a little 5.0 with an off the shelf cam. So surely your bigger motor with a custom cam makes what....600rwhp? Please teach me some stuff.
Point is some props were given to the 2010 Mustang and you started your bitch fit on and on and on about how the 2010 Camaro was soooo much better. Why don't you compare the 2010 Mustang to the 2010 GTO? OHHHHHHHH, so thats why your a little female. There is no GTO anymore. OOPs! Get a set of ***** and stop bitching about the new Mustang. If you don't like it, don't buy one. I'm sure no one would give a flying **** just like no one cares that you don't like it. So if you feel like you want to bitch more please take it to another thread and stop bringing your wet tampons in mine.
Since my car is such a slow piece of **** lets hear alittle about your car. I made 456rwhp out of a little 5.0 with an off the shelf cam. So surely your bigger motor with a custom cam makes what....600rwhp? Please teach me some stuff.
Point is some props were given to the 2010 Mustang and you started your bitch fit on and on and on about how the 2010 Camaro was soooo much better. Why don't you compare the 2010 Mustang to the 2010 GTO? OHHHHHHHH, so thats why your a little female. There is no GTO anymore. OOPs! Get a set of ***** and stop bitching about the new Mustang. If you don't like it, don't buy one. I'm sure no one would give a flying **** just like no one cares that you don't like it. So if you feel like you want to bitch more please take it to another thread and stop bringing your wet tampons in mine.
10-09-2009, 06:53 PM
#54
BTW you DO realize this is a GM LS vehicle board and that bashing on LS equiped vehicles in a forum dedicated to those vehicles is not only stupid but could (and should) lead to a ban? We dont go into a Ford forum and bash your cars like this and not expect retaliation.
Stopsign, you playing COD4 with me tonight?
10-09-2009, 07:55 PM
#57
