Lt1>ls1
A '98 auto vette is only a mid-low 13 second car on average. Doesn't take a whole lot to get an LT1 there.

After reading this, I really wish I didn't waste my time arguing with you.
Then after reading other parts of the forum where your brother fbody owners are also calling you out for being trollish, it makes a bit more sense. You just like pushing buttons/being trollish.
Last edited by Ke^in; Dec 29, 2009 at 08:16 AM.
I'm not pushing your buttons, you just give the 2V too much credit. They are slow as *****, and everyone agrees. I'm sorry if you think by any chance they are on average a 13 second car. **** the mach 1 is only a mid to high 13 car. I think you need to get some real world numbers and not this internet/magazine bull ****.
EDIT: Not saying I don't like pushing buttons, because I am VERY guilty of that, but I am not right now. Anyways, this is the damn internet, too many people act like little girls.
I'm not pushing your buttons

you just give the 2V too much credit.
They are slow as *****
and everyone agrees.
I'm sorry if you think by any chance they are on average a 13 second car.
www.rif.org
This comic reminds me of discussing this with you. Seriously

**** the mach 1 is only a mid to high 13 car.
I think you need to get some real world numbers and not this internet/magazine bull ****.
Anyways, this is the damn internet, too many people act like little girls.
Last edited by Ke^in; Dec 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM.
No, what I am saying is, the GT is rated at 14.0 seconds in the quarter. Most guys that can drive get them to 13.9 easily. That's ALL I am saying here. If you want to argue something else, by all means do it by yourself.
I know you aren't. I said you were TRYING to.
I know you aren't. I said you were TRYING to.
Read Up. I hope you don't think 13.9 in the 1/4 mile is fast..
If your rant was so just, you'd not have to revert to speaking for "EVERYONE ELSE" that is a self defensive mechanism.
AGAIN we said that someone that can drive can get 13.9s. The AVERAGE DRIVER cannot.
On an average day with an average drive it would be VERY safe to say that an ls1 is a low-high 13 second car (depending on options, they vary much more than a base GT). There have been NUMEROUS ls1s hit bottom 13s and a lot of high high 12s.. But, NO WAY IN HELL will I say ls1s run low-mid 13s on average, the truth is they don't.. Most run mid 13s.
Low to mid 13 car you mean. A stock Mach1 is a drivers race with a stock LS1.
And like I said, mid-high.... Just like an ls1!

Baseless accusation.
If you don't see by this post that you are being VERY blind then I don't know what to tell you man.. I'm stating facts, not internet times or the times people get with an EXCELLENT driver on a perfect day/pass.. I'm talking real world, sitting at a drag strip on a 70 degree day and watching bone stock cars go down the track, and not with Evan Smith driving them either.
So a bone stock Automatic LS1 raced a '95 Formula M6, Green, T-Tops, Grey with polished lip 17x9.5 C5 Z06's, !Cat,!AIR,!EGR, 1.6RR's, LPP LT headers and Magnaflow catback, J&M LCA's, UMI 3pt SFC's, T/A girdle cover, LS1 WS6 air box w/LG G2 lid, air foil, 3.73's, and a mail order tune from Trifecta. 13.1 @107 2.03 60' from a roll and lost...









