Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Lt1>ls1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 10:18 PM
  #141  
pillarpod's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: South Dakota
Default

agreed
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 10:32 PM
  #142  
916 BREDWNR's Avatar
10 Second Club
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: CALI
Default

Originally Posted by 1994t/a
I watched my friends full bolt on 93 z-28 beat a bone stock 98 A4 vette from a dig race about a year ago.hell i expected to see the vette close the gap up top but he never did.he got him by about 2 maybe 3 cars.....so its not impossible
A '98 auto vette is only a mid-low 13 second car on average. Doesn't take a whole lot to get an LT1 there.
Old Dec 28, 2009 | 10:36 PM
  #143  
pillarpod's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: South Dakota
Default

also agreed
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 06:55 AM
  #144  
1994t/a's Avatar
On The Tree
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Default

A '98 auto vette is only a mid-low 13 second car on average. Doesn't take a whole lot to get an LT1 there.
yeah but remember the ls1 was touched by the hand of Jebus.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:23 AM
  #145  
Ke^in's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: MOV
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
And most people that don't know how to drive a 2V get 15s......


After reading this, I really wish I didn't waste my time arguing with you.
Then after reading other parts of the forum where your brother fbody owners are also calling you out for being trollish, it makes a bit more sense. You just like pushing buttons/being trollish.


Last edited by Ke^in; Dec 29, 2009 at 08:16 AM.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:42 AM
  #146  
necrocannibal's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 13
From: Memphis,TN
Default

LOL this thread sounds like what Ive read about LS1 vs LS2 GTOs.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:47 AM
  #147  
Ke^in's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: MOV
Default

It's 100% Silly. That's what it is.

Besides everyone knows a LS2 GTO is faster.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:49 AM
  #148  
big hammer's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 226
From: over dere
Default

:facepalm:


good morning everyone
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:25 AM
  #149  
dsmfan95's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

So much bickering over 13/14sec cars.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 08:36 AM
  #150  
lemons12's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, TN
Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in


After reading this, I really wish I didn't waste my time arguing with you.
Then after reading other parts of the forum where your brother fbody owners are also calling you out for being trollish, it makes a bit more sense. You just like pushing buttons/being trollish.
So what you are saying is that a low-mid 13 second car on average with a bad driver is a bottom 14 second car... But a low 14 second car with a bad driver can't be a 15 second car.
I'm not pushing your buttons, you just give the 2V too much credit. They are slow as *****, and everyone agrees. I'm sorry if you think by any chance they are on average a 13 second car. **** the mach 1 is only a mid to high 13 car. I think you need to get some real world numbers and not this internet/magazine bull ****.
EDIT: Not saying I don't like pushing buttons, because I am VERY guilty of that, but I am not right now. Anyways, this is the damn internet, too many people act like little girls.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #151  
Ke^in's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: MOV
Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
So what you are saying is that a low-mid 13 second car on average with a bad driver is a bottom 14 second car... But a low 14 second car with a bad driver can't be a 15 second car.
No, what I am saying is, the GT is rated at 14.0 seconds in the quarter. Most guys that can drive get them to 13.9 easily. That's ALL I am saying here. If you want to argue something else, by all means do it by yourself.
I'm not pushing your buttons
I know you aren't. I said you were TRYING to.
you just give the 2V too much credit.
No, no I don't. I suggest before posting again that you read the many many posts on how I call my car slow all the time. 13.9 isn't fast. While people have gotten the 2v to go faster than 13.9 stock, it's not the norm. Nor would I claim it to be.
They are slow as *****
Read Up. I hope you don't think 13.9 in the 1/4 mile is fast..

and everyone agrees.
If your rant was so just, you'd not have to revert to speaking for "EVERYONE ELSE" that is a self defensive mechanism.
I'm sorry if you think by any chance they are on average a 13 second car.
AGAIN we said that someone that can drive can get 13.9s. The AVERAGE DRIVER cannot.

www.rif.org

This comic reminds me of discussing this with you. Seriously



**** the mach 1 is only a mid to high 13 car.
Low to mid 13 car you mean. A stock Mach1 is a drivers race with a stock LS1.
I think you need to get some real world numbers and not this internet/magazine bull ****.
Baseless accusation.
Anyways, this is the damn internet, too many people act like little girls.
No one here is acting like a girl. You're just being a troll.

Last edited by Ke^in; Dec 29, 2009 at 10:03 AM.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 06:23 PM
  #152  
lemons12's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, TN
Default

No, what I am saying is, the GT is rated at 14.0 seconds in the quarter. Most guys that can drive get them to 13.9 easily. That's ALL I am saying here. If you want to argue something else, by all means do it by yourself.
I know you aren't. I said you were TRYING to.
13.9 easily? So lets say on the right day with a dead hooking car.... 13.6-13.7.. Becuase I know you aren't taking in a perfectly launched car on a perfect day, that would be silly.. O ****!!!!!!!!! this is as fast as almost all stock ls1s, and mach 1s.... Thats odd, I thought the GTs got murdered by stock ls1s? I know I DESTROYED my share while stock.

Read Up. I hope you don't think 13.9 in the 1/4 mile is fast..
You have not a clue what I think is fast, as most people on here don't. I promise you my opinion on a quick/fast car is MUCH faster than yours.

If your rant was so just, you'd not have to revert to speaking for "EVERYONE ELSE" that is a self defensive mechanism.
There are plenty of other people that have spoken up, in this thread and the other.

AGAIN we said that someone that can drive can get 13.9s. The AVERAGE DRIVER cannot.
So, on an average day with an average driver... It would be VERY safe to say it is a low-mid 14 second car..
On an average day with an average drive it would be VERY safe to say that an ls1 is a low-high 13 second car (depending on options, they vary much more than a base GT). There have been NUMEROUS ls1s hit bottom 13s and a lot of high high 12s.. But, NO WAY IN HELL will I say ls1s run low-mid 13s on average, the truth is they don't.. Most run mid 13s.

Low to mid 13 car you mean. A stock Mach1 is a drivers race with a stock LS1.
That it is, with the ls1 having an advantage up top.. They usually trap about 2 MPH faster.
And like I said, mid-high.... Just like an ls1!

Baseless accusation.
very good accusation.


If you don't see by this post that you are being VERY blind then I don't know what to tell you man.. I'm stating facts, not internet times or the times people get with an EXCELLENT driver on a perfect day/pass.. I'm talking real world, sitting at a drag strip on a 70 degree day and watching bone stock cars go down the track, and not with Evan Smith driving them either.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #153  
The Manalishi's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 741
Likes: 11
Default

I hear there is a new set of heads for 2V that will put them in the nines. Just bolt them on and BAM 9 seconds in the quarter.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 06:36 PM
  #154  
lemons12's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 2
From: Winchester, TN
Default

Originally Posted by The Manalishi
I hear there is a new set of heads for 2V that will put them in the nines. Just bolt them on and BAM 9 seconds in the quarter.
Thought they ran high 9s stock?





O ****.. My bad, I thought we were talking 1/8 mile.
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 06:46 PM
  #155  
big hammer's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 226
From: over dere
Default

Originally Posted by the manalishi
i hear there is a new set of heads for 2v that will put them in the nines. Just bolt them on and bam 9 seconds in the quarter.
boom!
Originally Posted by lemons12
thought they ran high 9s stock?




O ****.. My bad, i thought we were talking 1/8 mile.
pah!
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 06:52 PM
  #156  
jpajkos's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Roseville, CA
Default

So a bone stock Automatic LS1 raced a '95 Formula M6, Green, T-Tops, Grey with polished lip 17x9.5 C5 Z06's, !Cat,!AIR,!EGR, 1.6RR's, LPP LT headers and Magnaflow catback, J&M LCA's, UMI 3pt SFC's, T/A girdle cover, LS1 WS6 air box w/LG G2 lid, air foil, 3.73's, and a mail order tune from Trifecta. 13.1 @107 2.03 60' from a roll and lost...
Old Dec 29, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #157  
JayplaySS's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,615
Likes: 161
From: Miami, OH
Default

Some entertainment while the thread closes...





Now we have covered everything




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.