Is the 340/345 in your sig your rwhp and rwtq?

 

That gets claimed because...

1. What are the chances of getting both BONE stock cars lined up?
2. Be honest with yourself, 9/10 the lt/ls will pull out on the mustang everytime. Maybe not by much, but they will end up in front.
3. Yes I'm glad there is a mature mustang owner here that knows how to drive their car well. But most are full of **** and can't.
4. I have been around the mustang crowd, and it's usually the younger car crowd, which is good. But they have a cocky attitude and don't know the difference between an intake mani and a CAI

 

Do you got enough to cover that? LMAO!

 

Yea that's it. Nothing to make a huge deal over. Another typical ls1 number lol

 

Here I'll do better for you. Take ANY of these cars in the link below, add ONLY a $139 set of gears and they will run faster than your car.

http://mach1registry.org/forums/showthread.php?t=99903

 

340rwhp running 12.9 is laughable. And you say a Mustang has to have MORE power than a LS1 to run the same times? Sure

 

No, loan me some of yours. LOL

 

Happy dyno? Just as a side note the LT1 does make a lot more torque than the 2V. So it is going to come out of the hole better and the Stang MAY not have enough to run it down but run a similar time. You've seen this as have I.

 

Lol is it saying I have 0 suspension mods, on a shitty 1.9 60' and only going 12.8 on a 275 nitto?

 

That makes no sense. If they run the same time then they are exactly the same in the 1/4th given both leave the line at the same time. Now reaction time has nothing at all to do with the question here. If both the 2v and the LT1 run 14.0-13.8 how is one faster than the other? I'm not saying one is faster than the other or not and I really don't care. I just want a logical answer from 50 shot guy on the question I asked him.

 

Are you making excuses?

 

Maybe, but not to happy as most fbodys with my mods put down about the same numbers and run around the same trap

 

I make 375Rwhp and run low-mid 11s on motor...

 

How bout this? This guy has a stock 302, TW heads, TW Stage 1 cam (shitty), and a 650 carb. I can assure you that car doesn't make anywhere close to 340rwhp and....well watch the video.

http://s246.photobucket.com/albums/g...t=coupe013.flv

 

I knew that wasn't going to come across the way I wanted it to. OK I'll try again. Two cars that are CAPABLE of running the same times. One has more torque than the other. On the street , this is the SRK, the car with the torque advantage is going to jump out on the other car, given equal drivers, and then the other car is going to have to catch the other one. Depending on how far they run the lower torque car may not catch the other. Is that more clear? On a track with identical reaction times you are correct it would make no difference. Sorry about my poorly worded post previously.

 

Yea and you also have an automatic do all the shifting for you. Tell me, do you have someone feed you too?

 

Not making excuses at all. My mph is alot higher than what it should be for my e.t.

 

Since the street doesn't have an ET from one point to the other you can't use it as a testing ground. Now if you could find a test of both going 1/2 or a mile then that would put the issue to rest. But I doubt there is one out there. Infact if you wanted you could compare the 1/8 times of both cars. If one runs slower than the other yet they both run the same time in the 1/4 then you can see that he was running down the other car and then you could GUESS what would happen after the 1/4.

 

109mph

That is right in the range of a bolt on Mach 1!!!!

 

Stopsign, you're bein a little pissy tonight aren't ya?

BTW that fox is pretty mean for a bunch of junk **** piled together. ET/mph?

Even with no power (aka ford powered) those little cars move out.