Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

GTO vs 306 Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2010, 07:53 AM
  #21  
TECH Resident
 
06 6.0 GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wouldnt believe me if i told you
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by necrocannibal
Ju1ce EVERYONE thinks GTOs are over 4000 pounds so thats not a surprise.
Including the new crop of camaro owners.

Few months ago i was checking out the new SS and a couple just bought a yellow one, we talked a little and i said it should be a fun race when it comes in.

Salesman intervines "The SS wont have a problem against your land boat" I didnt know what to do so i just left, with my "land boat" haha

Now back on topic!
Old 04-12-2010, 08:22 AM
  #22  
myk
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
myk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 1,883
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Land boat? The new Camaro's the one that looks like a landboat...
Old 04-12-2010, 11:36 AM
  #23  
Teching In
 
fiveoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Arnold
Oh, and in a street gas (93 octane), somewhat reasonably cammed 302/306 360 rwhp is phenomenal. That's so good, that unless I looked under the hood and saw nothing but premium parts, I wouldn't believe it either --> guys tend to exaggerate what their cars can do. Mine made "only" about 320 rwhp and walked on a lot of other 302s that made 400+rwhp, or so they said, including a few blown 302s....

A typical H/C/I 302 street car is going to make between 260 and 350 rwhp with very few outliers.
+1000

360rwhp on a mustang dyno in a foxbody will run low 11's with traction. Mid to high 11s in a heavier sn95. I highly doubt your buddy actually has 360rwhp on a 306 h/c/i.

Nice kill thou.
Old 04-12-2010, 11:51 AM
  #24  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fiveoh
+1000

360rwhp on a mustang dyno in a foxbody will run low 11's with traction. Mid to high 11s in a heavier sn95. I highly doubt your buddy actually has 360rwhp on a 306 h/c/i.

Nice kill thou.
Maybe at ATCO in December on slicks and skinnies.
Plus we raced from a roll where traps are more important (if you're going to armchair qb this race).
"With traction" my GTO would easily be in the 11's, btw.
Old 04-12-2010, 12:09 PM
  #25  
Teching In
 
fiveoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
Maybe at ATCO in December on slicks and skinnies.
Plus we raced from a roll where traps are more important (if you're going to armchair qb this race).
"With traction" my GTO would easily be in the 11's, btw.
Yes those numbers are probably assuming a 0 DA.(although atco in the winter is probably -1500 )

I'm not disputing your claim of beating him at all, just like Chris said 360rwhp on a mustang dyno in a h/c/i 306 is very hard to do and impressive. Any more details of his exact setup?
Old 04-12-2010, 12:21 PM
  #26  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

306 c.i
9:5 to 1 compression
Ford Racing F- cam
Trickflow Twisted Wedge aluminum heads
1.6 roller rockers.
Trickflow street heat upper and lower intake manifold
BBK 65mm Throttlebody
mac cold air intake
Pro-m 75mm mass air meter.
Ford racing 24lb injectors
ford racing shorty headers.
bassani bx -x-pipe with hi flow cats
SLP LM1 catback exaust
Old 04-12-2010, 12:45 PM
  #27  
Staging Lane
 
Sticks n Stones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Edit: first thing first- Good Kill on the Mustang OP!

This is how my last 5 minutes of reading went:
"Cool race, built 5.0's are always a reputable kill"
"... wtf? These guys are saying 3.06's are capable of what?!" Where's that 'Quote' button...
"... make that 'Multi-Quote' button... these guys are clueless!"
"Oh wait, sarge is chargin' to the rescue."
"Damn, Sarge just got shot down." Multi-Quote... another Multi-Quote...
"Oh, Chris Arnold just blew them Internet HorsePower bullshitters up, and destroyed there rebuttals, too!"

Now I gotta unclick all them Multi-Quote's. F* it: log out, log back in; problem solved.
Old 04-12-2010, 01:20 PM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CyberGrey Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
306 c.i
9:5 to 1 compression
Ford Racing F- cam
Trickflow Twisted Wedge aluminum heads
1.6 roller rockers.
Trickflow street heat upper and lower intake manifold
BBK 65mm Throttlebody
mac cold air intake
Pro-m 75mm mass air meter.
Ford racing 24lb injectors
ford racing shorty headers.
bassani bx -x-pipe with hi flow cats
SLP LM1 catback exaust
I call BS, everyone knows that Trickflow Twisted Wedge make 100 rwhp more than comparable setups!!! He should have smoked you easily, there is a mustang guy in here that made almost 500rwhp w/a 331.
Old 04-12-2010, 01:28 PM
  #29  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
tittan1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somerset WI
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Good kill sounds like the stang needs some no2
Old 04-12-2010, 03:27 PM
  #30  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ju1ce do you actually own a 385rwhp GTO or even a GTO at all? If so post up some proof. Not just pictures, some proof. Make a funny sign under the windshield wiper saying Stopsign32v is a retard or something. Because I don't believe you do and I don't believe you ran into a 1995 Mustang GT with a 306 that makes 360rwhp. Please prove me wrong because after all your stupid posts and this dumb thread https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...-mach-1-a.html I have a hard time believing anything you say.

Last edited by Stopsign32v; 04-12-2010 at 03:36 PM.
Old 04-12-2010, 03:45 PM
  #31  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fiveoh
+1000

360rwhp on a mustang dyno in a foxbody will run low 11's with traction. Mid to high 11s in a heavier sn95. I highly doubt your buddy actually has 360rwhp on a 306 h/c/i.

Nice kill thou
i highly doubt that. dont stock sn95s ON average run in the 15s? i just dont see this being too common. possible, yes. common, doubtful. but im no mustang expert...
Old 04-12-2010, 03:47 PM
  #32  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Ju1ce do you actually own a 385rwhp GTO or even a GTO at all? If so post up some proof. Not just pictures, some proof. Make a funny sign under the windshield wiper saying Stopsign32v is a retard or something. Because I don't believe you do and I don't believe you ran into a 1995 Mustang GT with a 306 that makes 360rwhp. Please prove me wrong because after all your stupid posts and this dumb thread https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...-mach-1-a.html I have a hard time believing anything you say.
you love your callouts, dont ya. but its okay, someones gotta have the ***** to say it.

...but in the sign, it should say GTO < any ford.
Old 04-12-2010, 03:54 PM
  #33  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
sujomatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Juice definitely does have a GTO .. I've ran him.. but thats all i shall say!
Old 04-12-2010, 04:03 PM
  #34  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Ju1ce do you actually own a 385rwhp GTO or even a GTO at all? If so post up some proof. Not just pictures, some proof. Make a funny sign under the windshield wiper saying Stopsign32v is a retard or something. Because I don't believe you do and I don't believe you ran into a 1995 Mustang GT with a 306 that makes 360rwhp. Please prove me wrong because after all your stupid posts and this dumb thread https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...-mach-1-a.html I have a hard time believing anything you say.
But I did actually race a Mach-1 driven by a girl who said her bf said it would go low 12's...
Old 04-12-2010, 05:00 PM
  #35  
Teching In
 
Chris Arnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks, man. That made me laugh. Keep you multi-quote button nearby, though. They might come back, but I won't be able to field any more rebuttals for long. I'm off to do a field exercise (army guy here) for a little over a month.

I love 5.0s, and have had them in my mind for 13 years. Having owned 2 H/C/I stock shortblock 302s (270 & 320rwhp), a twin-turbo HCI 302 (420rwhp), and a *****-out aftermarket blocked 1200hp capable 331 (760 rwhp at only 14psi so far), I'd like to believe that I know the 5.0 basics, but I'm always open-minded and I welcome any credible evidence to correct my understanding.

Originally Posted by Sticks n Stones
Edit: first thing first- Good Kill on the Mustang OP!

This is how my last 5 minutes of reading went:
"Cool race, built 5.0's are always a reputable kill"
"... wtf? These guys are saying 3.06's are capable of what?!" Where's that 'Quote' button...
"... make that 'Multi-Quote' button... these guys are clueless!"
"Oh wait, sarge is chargin' to the rescue."
"Damn, Sarge just got shot down." Multi-Quote... another Multi-Quote...
"Oh, Chris Arnold just blew them Internet HorsePower bullshitters up, and destroyed there rebuttals, too!"

Now I gotta unclick all them Multi-Quote's. F* it: log out, log back in; problem solved.
Old 04-12-2010, 05:09 PM
  #36  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ju1ce
But I did actually race a Mach-1 driven by a girl who said her bf said it would go low 12's...
So what you're saying is you don't actually own a GTO
Old 04-12-2010, 05:20 PM
  #37  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Ju1ce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chavez885
So what you're saying is you don't actually own a GTO
The irony in all this was that the Mach was also white
Old 04-12-2010, 05:39 PM
  #38  
TECH Apprentice
 
92builtbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Throughout this whole thread, I still don't understand why the argument is void unless the power made from 306 cubes is from a production block...?
Old 04-12-2010, 05:54 PM
  #39  
Teching In
 
Chris Arnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't understand your confusion. No argument is void.

Also, it's already clear, based on the OPs response laying out the combination that the 306 does have a production HO block.
Old 04-12-2010, 05:58 PM
  #40  
Teching In
 
Chris Arnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh BTW, it's also very clear that the car is not making the claimed 360rwhp. The powerband of the F-cam and the capability of those heads puts the power of that engine in the 285-305rwhp range depending on how well it was tuned, and more than likely towards the bottom end of that range on a dynojet, not a Mustang dyno.

Chris


Quick Reply: GTO vs 306 Mustang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 AM.