GTO vs 306 Mustang
04-12-2010, 06:09 PM
#42
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh BTW, it's also very clear that the car is not making the claimed 360rwhp. The powerband of the F-cam and the capability of those heads puts the power of that engine in the 285-305rwhp range depending on how well it was tuned, and more than likely towards the bottom end of that range on a dynojet, not a Mustang dyno.
Chris
Chris
But I was afraid ppl wouldn't believe me
04-12-2010, 06:34 PM
#43
Staging Lane
It's cool Ju1ce, I believe ya. Been told too many times to count that so-and-so's car puts out unbelievable power etc. etc. then I would run them and that power evaporated faster than $100 at a strip club... and goes into the same "black" hole I bet, too.
04-12-2010, 09:51 PM
#46
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Schertz, Texas
Posts: 2,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Edit: first thing first- Good Kill on the Mustang OP!
This is how my last 5 minutes of reading went:
"Cool race, built 5.0's are always a reputable kill"
"... wtf? These guys are saying 3.06's are capable of what?!" Where's that 'Quote' button...
"... make that 'Multi-Quote' button... these guys are clueless!"
"Oh wait, sarge is chargin' to the rescue."
"Damn, Sarge just got shot down." Multi-Quote... another Multi-Quote...
"Oh, Chris Arnold just blew them Internet HorsePower bullshitters up, and destroyed there rebuttals, too!"
Now I gotta unclick all them Multi-Quote's. F* it: log out, log back in; problem solved.
This is how my last 5 minutes of reading went:
"Cool race, built 5.0's are always a reputable kill"
"... wtf? These guys are saying 3.06's are capable of what?!" Where's that 'Quote' button...
"... make that 'Multi-Quote' button... these guys are clueless!"
"Oh wait, sarge is chargin' to the rescue."
"Damn, Sarge just got shot down." Multi-Quote... another Multi-Quote...
"Oh, Chris Arnold just blew them Internet HorsePower bullshitters up, and destroyed there rebuttals, too!"
Now I gotta unclick all them Multi-Quote's. F* it: log out, log back in; problem solved.
04-12-2010, 10:16 PM
#48
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sowwy I never grabbed the dyno sheet. I do have the stock dyno sheet when it made 345whp and has since gotten catless longtubes and a tune.
Would you like to see that?
His heads are ported, not sure if that makes much difference.
Would you like to see that?
His heads are ported, not sure if that makes much difference.
Nothing wrong with a high 12 second GTO. And 
for running a "360rwhp" 95 Mustang GT.
04-12-2010, 10:34 PM
#50
04-12-2010, 10:35 PM
#51
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-12-2010, 10:39 PM
#53
Launching!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-12-2010, 10:39 PM
#54
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock tires, full weight. Only headers and a tune done.
12.5 @ 113 with a 2.1 60'
http://www.streetfire.net/video/gto-...aro_707980.htm
Not to mention DA was up over 1000.
12.5 @ 113 with a 2.1 60'
http://www.streetfire.net/video/gto-...aro_707980.htm
Not to mention DA was up over 1000.
04-12-2010, 10:44 PM
#55
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://ls1tech.com/forums/street-ra...-mach-1-a.html
He posted this saying he owned a 3.8 F body.
He posted this saying he owned a 3.8 F body.
04-12-2010, 10:46 PM
#56
Stock tires, full weight. Only headers and a tune done.
12.5 @ 113 with a 2.1 60'
http://www.streetfire.net/video/gto-...aro_707980.htm
Not to mention DA was up over 1000.
12.5 @ 113 with a 2.1 60'
http://www.streetfire.net/video/gto-...aro_707980.htm
Not to mention DA was up over 1000.
04-12-2010, 10:48 PM
#57
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's pretty pathetic is that the 5.0 needs a h/c/i to do what I did bone stock.
04-12-2010, 10:55 PM
#59
What I showed you was a video of a 12.5 @ 113 with a super awesome 2.1 60' on stock tires. But since you already knew that, and you're bench racing extrodinare, why don't you tell me what it'd do at zero DA with big and littles at a much better track...
What's pretty pathetic is that the 5.0 needs a h/c/i to do what I did bone stock.
What's pretty pathetic is that the 5.0 needs a h/c/i to do what I did bone stock.
And no thats not pathetic.
A 5.0L car with 1986 technology running what a 2005 6.0L car runs. Again, about this 1995 Mustang GT you ran which you know so much about. I assume he is a friend or something so what would his user name be on which site?
I still think you are full of **** and just here to start things.
04-12-2010, 10:59 PM
#60
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you said was your ran 11's with slicks. I don't care about math divided by your 60' minus the DA times the distance the sun is from the moon divided by pie. Show me your 11 second time slip with a nasty little note on it.
And no thats not pathetic. A 5.0L car with 1986 technology running what a 2005 6.0L car runs.
Again, about this 1995 Mustang GT you ran which you know so much about. I assume he is a friend or something so what would his user name be on which site?
And no thats not pathetic.
A 5.0L car with 1986 technology running what a 2005 6.0L car runs. Again, about this 1995 Mustang GT you ran which you know so much about. I assume he is a friend or something so what would his user name be on which site?
The kid with the 306 isn't my friend, he's an arrogant ***** like 99% of you Mustang fanbois are, I don't know his screen name on any forums all I know is what he told me his car has and what it made.
I know from what other people who know him said was he dropped about $20,000 into the car.