WS6 VS MACH1 (vids)
04-18-2010, 06:39 PM
#41
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DETROIT,MI
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-18-2010, 06:40 PM
#42
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice to see you post that again. Some bowtie nutswingers are having a hard time understanding facts.
04-18-2010, 06:42 PM
#43
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-18-2010, 06:47 PM
#44
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DETROIT,MI
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-18-2010, 07:30 PM
#49
alcoholic! you can talk when youre puny 5.slow gets more than 300 rwhp
04-18-2010, 07:41 PM
#50
On The Tree
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: stockton california
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive raced plenty of Mach1 mustangs both auto and stick, with good drivers, or so maybe they thought. My friends with the mach 1 can honestly say that stock for stock an ls1 is indeed faster rather it be an auto ls1 or m6. Machs are hella slow.
I would buy my girlfriend a Mach 1, she'd definitely be able to handle that kinda power.
someone bring me a stock Mach1 and ill run them with my stock camaro, i will show everyone that they are slow, **** i raced a 2001 cobra with gears, full exhaust and intake, and i wouldnt say i raped him but i did pull on him. sorry ford boys.
I would buy my girlfriend a Mach 1, she'd definitely be able to handle that kinda power.
someone bring me a stock Mach1 and ill run them with my stock camaro, i will show everyone that they are slow, **** i raced a 2001 cobra with gears, full exhaust and intake, and i wouldnt say i raped him but i did pull on him. sorry ford boys.
Last edited by eduardo; 04-18-2010 at 07:43 PM. Reason: typo
04-18-2010, 08:37 PM
#54
Ive raced plenty of Mach1 mustangs both auto and stick, with good drivers, or so maybe they thought. My friends with the mach 1 can honestly say that stock for stock an ls1 is indeed faster rather it be an auto ls1 or m6. Machs are hella slow.
I would buy my girlfriend a Mach 1, she'd definitely be able to handle that kinda power.
someone bring me a stock Mach1 and ill run them with my stock camaro, i will show everyone that they are slow, **** i raced a 2001 cobra with gears, full exhaust and intake, and i wouldnt say i raped him but i did pull on him. sorry ford boys.
I would buy my girlfriend a Mach 1, she'd definitely be able to handle that kinda power.
someone bring me a stock Mach1 and ill run them with my stock camaro, i will show everyone that they are slow, **** i raced a 2001 cobra with gears, full exhaust and intake, and i wouldnt say i raped him but i did pull on him. sorry ford boys.
PS, I'm going to have some fun with you clown boy.
04-18-2010, 08:54 PM
#55
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive raced plenty of Mach1 mustangs both auto and stick, with good drivers, or so maybe they thought. My friends with the mach 1 can honestly say that stock for stock an ls1 is indeed faster rather it be an auto ls1 or m6. Machs are hella slow.
I would buy my girlfriend a Mach 1, she'd definitely be able to handle that kinda power.
someone bring me a stock Mach1 and ill run them with my stock camaro, i will show everyone that they are slow, **** i raced a 2001 cobra with gears, full exhaust and intake, and i wouldnt say i raped him but i did pull on him. sorry ford boys.
I would buy my girlfriend a Mach 1, she'd definitely be able to handle that kinda power.
someone bring me a stock Mach1 and ill run them with my stock camaro, i will show everyone that they are slow, **** i raced a 2001 cobra with gears, full exhaust and intake, and i wouldnt say i raped him but i did pull on him. sorry ford boys.
I lived there for 11 years and still visit a few times a year. Where abouts in stockton are you?
