Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Cammed SS vs Modded Evo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2010, 07:23 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Ryan00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Cammed SS vs Modded Evo

Ran into an evo the other night that claimed 370 to the wheels on stock turbo. Im guessing thats full bolt on and cams(not too sure). My car made 376 to the wheels through a 12 bolt. I might be wrong but i feel like my car shoulda pulled harder up top. what do you guys think? should i start diagnosing my car? or was that outcome expected? mods in sig

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snqy8XTRHKE
Old 08-06-2010, 07:59 AM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
the jester 812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: eastern shore, VA
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

total bullshit, he lied to you to bait you into a race. especially from a roll. with your gears, cam, and exhaust, you shoulda pulled him better. I'm not saying anything is wrong with your car, im saying he pulled a fast one on you. i bet he has a lot more than he told you.
Old 08-06-2010, 08:55 AM
  #3  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A friend of mine used to have a mild bolt-on/cammed EVO, and I believe he said he made ~330whp... but who knows how much boost this guy was running.
Old 08-06-2010, 09:14 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
 
Beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Coming from a Mitsu guy, this seems completely accurate.

400whp is attainable on the stock turbo with bigger cams and lots of boost, 370whp is common on stock turbo cars with decent parts/tuning.


He makes the same WHP you do, likely makes more torque, weighs less, and has better gear ratios. While you do have a low final drive, he has a close ratio box, which does a lot to keep the car in the meat of the powerband.

The outcome is expected.
Old 08-06-2010, 11:52 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Tx98Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Abilene Tx
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a buddy of mine had one with bolt ons, upgraded turbo and meth injection, putting down 476awhp on 26lbs of boost, it was a pretty nasty little car!
Old 08-06-2010, 01:04 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by the jester 812
total bullshit, he lied to you to bait you into a race. especially from a roll. with your gears, cam, and exhaust, you shoulda pulled him better. I'm not saying anything is wrong with your car, im saying he pulled a fast one on you. i bet he has a lot more than he told you.
Wrong

Originally Posted by Beans
Coming from a Mitsu guy, this seems completely accurate.

400whp is attainable on the stock turbo with bigger cams and lots of boost, 370whp is common on stock turbo cars with decent parts/tuning.


He makes the same WHP you do, likely makes more torque, weighs less, and has better gear ratios. While you do have a low final drive, he has a close ratio box, which does a lot to keep the car in the meat of the powerband.

The outcome is expected.
Correct.....local guy was running 375awhp with cams/bolt-ons/tuned with E85. Thing ran hard.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:16 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Ryan00SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Okay i don't feel as bad now lol. Just didn't think those awd cars had that much top end.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:18 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
MrDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beans

He makes the same WHP you do, likely makes more torque, weighs less, and has better gear ratios. While you do have a low final drive, he has a close ratio box, which does a lot to keep the car in the meat of the powerband.
This seems fishy. I am not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to 4 bangers, but it seems like BS that an Evo with stock turbo making between 370-400 would be making more than 365lbs of torque.

I would expect torque to be in the high 200's at best.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:23 PM
  #9  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well running EVOs that make ~400whp make ~375wtq as well in many cases.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:24 PM
  #10  
Teching In
 
1992TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The EVO weighs probably ~3100lbs, and makes the same power as you (and more torque, but that doesn't really matter in this situation).
Old 08-06-2010, 01:26 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
1992TsiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oshkosh, WI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MrDavid
This seems fishy. I am not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to 4 bangers, but it seems like BS that an Evo with stock turbo making between 370-400 would be making more than 365lbs of torque.

I would expect torque to be in the high 200's at best.
Small turbos usually have a higher torque number than horsepower.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:35 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
chavez885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by MrDavid
This seems fishy. I am not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to 4 bangers, but it seems like BS that an Evo with stock turbo making between 370-400 would be making more than 365lbs of torque.

I would expect torque to be in the high 200's at best.
The difference is its not a honda/acura. The suburas/evos/srt's are known to make similar or more torque than HP.

Why different than a honda? No clue, maybe because they were built to be turboed?
Old 08-06-2010, 01:35 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
 
Beans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MrDavid
This seems fishy. I am not the sharpest tool in the shed when it comes to 4 bangers, but it seems like BS that an Evo with stock turbo making between 370-400 would be making more than 365lbs of torque.

I would expect torque to be in the high 200's at best.
Edit: You guys beat me to it!

On a honda, yes. Mitsu head design is very different, and that is reflected in midrange power.

The fbody might have more TQ, but not by much.

Many small turbo mitsu's running high psi make a lot of midrange TQ because thats where the turbo is most efficient. The key is getting near the limits of the turbo. If you're not near the max of the turbo, you will see a lot less torque. Going from 23 psi -> 32, my car gained some top end for sure, but most noticeable gain was the midrange TQ hit.

Here's a dyno from a small turbo car on 27psi. A stock turbo is a little smaller, and would produce TQ number even closer to the max hp if run at high boost.


Last edited by Beans; 08-06-2010 at 01:43 PM.
Old 08-06-2010, 01:36 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (39)
 
therobman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nyc
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

swap out that vagina cam for something more agressive
Old 08-06-2010, 01:38 PM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (97)
 
Funkster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Urbandale, Iowa
Posts: 990
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Beans
Coming from a Mitsu guy, this seems completely accurate.

400whp is attainable on the stock turbo with bigger cams and lots of boost, 370whp is common on stock turbo cars with decent parts/tuning.


He makes the same WHP you do, likely makes more torque, weighs less, and has better gear ratios. While you do have a low final drive, he has a close ratio box, which does a lot to keep the car in the meat of the powerband.

The outcome is expected.

Agreed.
Old 08-06-2010, 02:22 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (11)
 
MrDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks. Excuse the ignorance. Continue with your regulary scheduled thread.
Old 08-06-2010, 04:52 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Sucks to hear I expected a little better but It sounds like he has more mods than he's willing to tell. that is almost ALWAYS true when it comes to the import driver trying to race a muscle car or american car.

I think your cam is pretty mild too but now you need to do cylinder heads and a slightly more aggressive cam and make sure this doesnt happen again

Your car sounds sweet by the way. You won in my book. As far as im concerned that little pos is still a subaru. the ONLY thing making him happy that night was that he won. he's still driving a pos.

Wanted to also add that your 3.90 gears are slowing you down in roll-ons like that. a 3.73 or a stock rear gear is ideal for higher speed roll -ons.
Old 08-06-2010, 04:59 PM
  #18  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nastyc4
Your car sounds sweet by the way. You won in my book. As far as im concerned that little pos is still a subaru. the ONLY thing making him happy that night was that he won. he's still driving a pos.
What the hell is wrong with some of the guys here?
Old 08-06-2010, 05:04 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (13)
 
Nastyc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
What the hell is wrong with some of the guys here?
ahah just saying that the camaro is the better car. Speed is so easy. If I bolted a rocket engine to a tricycle and killed that subaru what would people say? they's say what a pos the tricycle is which is true.
Old 08-06-2010, 05:07 PM
  #20  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nastyc4
ahah just saying that the camaro is the better car. Speed is so easy. If I bolted a rocket engine to a tricycle and killed that subaru what would people say? they's say what a pos the tricycle is which is true.
Why is a Camaro better than a WRX or Evo? (and btw an Evo isn't a Subaru)


Quick Reply: Cammed SS vs Modded Evo



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.