vett for the win!
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
vett for the win! told yall i would post the video win or lose! the vett puts down 500hp on motor built big cube motor with a bunch of nitrous! vr my 302ci build motor on a 100 shot! i think he sprayed off the roll then let off **** hauls ***! enjoy boys it was the only damn ls1 i could find that would race me!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nujgNFrRdmo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nujgNFrRdmo
You have gained a bit of respect back. You can't just make such a small post talking **** and expect anyone to take you serious.
Glad to see the vett win. Should have went for a much slower apponet. Maybe a 6cyl f-body. Hopefully you post some more vids and for your sake maybe a win for the old Stang. Be cool and repectfull and we will all be the same.
Glad to see the vett win. Should have went for a much slower apponet. Maybe a 6cyl f-body. Hopefully you post some more vids and for your sake maybe a win for the old Stang. Be cool and repectfull and we will all be the same.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
An 8.50 on a 2.2 60' makes that a low 12 second mustang with good traction. Pull a 1.5-1.6 60' and you're going to yank that ET down by A LOT! Add a 100 shot, and 11.8s are a conservative estimate. custm2500 obviously has a bone to pick with you, which is why he's being a dick.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
An 8.50 on a 2.2 60' makes that a low 12 second mustang with good traction. Pull a 1.5-1.6 60' and you're going to yank that ET down by A LOT! Add a 100 shot, and 11.8s are a conservative estimate. custm2500 obviously has a bone to pick with you, which is why he's being a dick.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
An 8.50 on a 2.2 60' makes that a low 12 second mustang with good traction. Pull a 1.5-1.6 60' and you're going to yank that ET down by A LOT! Add a 100 shot, and 11.8s are a conservative estimate. custm2500 obviously has a bone to pick with you, which is why he's being a dick.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
yea some guys know little about drag racing! 60ft is half the race car hooks pretty good now just lackin convertor! its coming real soon but if i spray it out the hole it seems to flash ok! guess well see when i get to the track!
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Now, back to the video. Regardless of his traction from a dig, his car should hook and run just like an 11 second car from a roll as it sits.
Chris
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
From: crossett, Arkansas
An 8.50 on a 2.2 60' makes that a low 12 second mustang with good traction. Pull a 1.5-1.6 60' and you're going to yank that ET down by A LOT! Add a 100 shot, and 11.8s are a conservative estimate. custm2500 obviously has a bone to pick with you, which is why he's being a dick.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
It's all in traction, though. If you don't have the traction, you'll never see the ET.
are you a retard? 8.5 is not low 12's in the 1/4................. its mid 13's.
chris stop with the if this if that if if if.... 8.5 thats only a tenth quicker than what i ran in my 2001 TA stock lol with a 2.1 60ft. is that how mustang guys get through the days. going well if i had this and added that id be this fast..... there is no guarantee he will get a 1.5 to 1.6 60ft in the first place. either way he is a moron to add a 100shot if he cant get traction without it. power means nothing if you cant put it down.
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
are you a retard? 8.5 is not low 12's in the 1/4................. its mid 13's.
chris stop with the if this if that if if if.... 8.5 thats only a tenth quicker than what i ran in my 2001 TA stock lol with a 2.1 60ft. is that how mustang guys get through the days. going well if i had this and added that id be this fast..... there is no guarantee he will get a 1.5 to 1.6 60ft in the first place. either way he is a moron to add a 100shot if he cant get traction without it. power means nothing if you cant put it down.
chris stop with the if this if that if if if.... 8.5 thats only a tenth quicker than what i ran in my 2001 TA stock lol with a 2.1 60ft. is that how mustang guys get through the days. going well if i had this and added that id be this fast..... there is no guarantee he will get a 1.5 to 1.6 60ft in the first place. either way he is a moron to add a 100shot if he cant get traction without it. power means nothing if you cant put it down.
did u not read the part about having tires now! gezz
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
chris stop with the if this if that if if if....
8.5 thats only a tenth quicker than what i ran in my 2001 TA stock lol with a 2.1 60ft.
is that how mustang guys get through the days. going well if i had this and added that id be this fast.....
there is no guarantee he will get a 1.5 to 1.6 60ft in the first place.
either way he is a moron to add a 100shot if he cant get traction without it. power means nothing if you cant put it down.
Last edited by Chris Arnold; Sep 5, 2010 at 09:09 PM.
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
My good setup consisted of a fox-body with 4-cyl front springs, a removed front sway bar, and 15" ET streets. Granted I was running 4.10s with a manual tranny. He'll need a convertor to get down there.
That vette did pull ya pretty damn good. But then again a car with the sort of setup he has should be able to pull. Good job getting it on video.
GXPPOWER the comments you said in your last post are ignorant. We all know that chances are likely that if a car is running a 2.2 60' time then it is either having serious traction issues or extremely extremely slow.
When I just had boltons and 100 wetshot on the G8 the car was capable of low 12's. I had Mickey DR's on order but still decided to take it to the track and spray it with the progressive controller on a mild ramp to see what it could so on streets. The best ET the car ran was a 12.8 with a 2.2 60'. Even with the mild progressive ramp traction was so horrible I had to completely get out of the gas just after the launch a few times. On average the car ran 12.8-12.9 with 2.2-2.3 60' times. Once the Mickeys made it on the ET's dropped to where they should have been based upon what the initial timeslips said. Being able to analyze a dragstrip timeslip is one of the key components to making your car faster because it tells so much. If you cannot understand what affects what then you are bound to stay slow and clueless. It seems you are in this category. Good luck trying to understand timeslips.
GXPPOWER the comments you said in your last post are ignorant. We all know that chances are likely that if a car is running a 2.2 60' time then it is either having serious traction issues or extremely extremely slow.
When I just had boltons and 100 wetshot on the G8 the car was capable of low 12's. I had Mickey DR's on order but still decided to take it to the track and spray it with the progressive controller on a mild ramp to see what it could so on streets. The best ET the car ran was a 12.8 with a 2.2 60'. Even with the mild progressive ramp traction was so horrible I had to completely get out of the gas just after the launch a few times. On average the car ran 12.8-12.9 with 2.2-2.3 60' times. Once the Mickeys made it on the ET's dropped to where they should have been based upon what the initial timeslips said. Being able to analyze a dragstrip timeslip is one of the key components to making your car faster because it tells so much. If you cannot understand what affects what then you are bound to stay slow and clueless. It seems you are in this category. Good luck trying to understand timeslips.
who gives a f*** what if. wait till he runs the damn thing. Once he does every single one of you will come in saying, well if you would do this, or would have done that you would have ran that.
OP, you got yanked hard, what are the details on his car. A stock motor LS1 Vette with 100 shot would still yank pretty close to that if your mid 12s.
OP, you got yanked hard, what are the details on his car. A stock motor LS1 Vette with 100 shot would still yank pretty close to that if your mid 12s.