00 Cammed T/A vs 11 Mustang 5.0 - Video
#121
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep. PM sent!
#122
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well yea I'm sure mine would do that too with 12+ lbs of boost. I'll have those numbers for you next season though. But I don't deny people that have fast cars I know how to respect that and your vette is quick I won't lie, but I'm happy with my car and how it is since I'm still in college
#123
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hahaha its funny u say that bc i ran my buddies procharged 3v from like a 20 and pulled a car instantly then slightly pulled after til i missed 3rd ugggghhhh. then he wanted to go from 50 bc he wasnt in boost... i didnt know boosted cars get a handy cap where i have to race them so they start in boost. lol but yea i started in 2nd bc the runs were a bit rushed. i coudl prolly get a 50 in first off if i had the time to set up. but anywho i was also at like 2500 rpms with the stock 342s in the rear haha. he pulled a car on me or so by the end of his run
#127
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#129
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
compared to all the hype of them taking down heads/cam vettes lol. I expected the car to pull a lot better it didnt even spin nailing it at 4k in first and it just abrely broke the tires loose banging second.
I didnt know the 5.0 engine was built to be used specifically with 87 octane though, hence why a tune wakes them up so much.
I didnt know the 5.0 engine was built to be used specifically with 87 octane though, hence why a tune wakes them up so much.
#130
12 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NH
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
compared to all the hype of them taking down heads/cam vettes lol. I expected the car to pull a lot better it didnt even spin nailing it at 4k in first and it just abrely broke the tires loose banging second.
I didnt know the 5.0 engine was built to be used specifically with 87 octane though, hence why a tune wakes them up so much.
I didnt know the 5.0 engine was built to be used specifically with 87 octane though, hence why a tune wakes them up so much.
#132
TECH Enthusiast
2011 mustangs ARE NOT tuned for 87 octane. they are tuned to read octane and adjust the ti-vct and fuel/ignition. Ford DID tune these 2011 GT's conseratively. i understand why they did it. its about warranty issues. the tuners gains in mid range and low end are huge. up to 40 lb-ft improvement from 2500-4500 rpms. at 6500 rpms the tuners and stock tuning are only 5 or so hp different, but before and after that the differences are more. the engineers who designed this motor are laughing to themselves as we try to understand exaclty what they gave us. 700rwhp on stock internals is tops so far, and 600rwhp looks to be conservative for long term survival.
#133
TECH Enthusiast
#134
TECH Enthusiast
hmm. mine spins all the way through 1st, second, and spins 3rd for a few seconds, chirps fourth. they cannot take down a z of any kind or a C6. C5's with mild bolt ons....ill know soon. im gonna run one when he feels like it. i got bolt ons in the mail.
#137
compared to all the hype of them taking down heads/cam vettes lol. I expected the car to pull a lot better it didnt even spin nailing it at 4k in first and it just abrely broke the tires loose banging second.
I didnt know the 5.0 engine was built to be used specifically with 87 octane though, hence why a tune wakes them up so much.
I didnt know the 5.0 engine was built to be used specifically with 87 octane though, hence why a tune wakes them up so much.
#140
just fyi because you think DR's make such a big difference (which they can) but my car cut the same sixty foot on sumitumo street tires as it did on nitto drag radials...both 315's...both 1.8 sixty foots