350 vortec vs. 2008 mustang 4.6
11-27-2010, 06:15 PM
#42
Staging Lane
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: California Bay Area
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if your going from a dig 4.10s for a better launch.i run 3.42s m6 and a 50 roll from 2nd seems to be the best so 4.10s from a dig 3.42s if your rollin.4.10s can be good on the freeway as well but they seem 2 be best for racing from a dead stop.maybe i'm wrong?
11-28-2010, 02:55 AM
#47
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
), then you keep your "street racing record." Damn man, you should go to race warz with that unbeatable catfish. You'd pwn er'body.
ok, we have established my name is Tye, can we move on now? and you said 3v's are so **** slow even with mods so you should be able to beat my slow one right? i only make 330whp, surely you make that or better with the almighty LS1? you will probably beat me by 8 lengths too in your superfast stock auto camaro.
oh it will prove my slow 3v is faster than your shitbox camaro.
oh it will prove my slow 3v is faster than your shitbox camaro.
If you really want to get upset, I have a 4v that Ill give you 3 lengths and the hit, just to shut u up.
I also have a 3v that will make you think otherwise.
Ahhhhh, he drug me down to his moronic level and beat me with experience.
Curse you Mystic z-28, and your unbeatable, STOCK-ish LS1
Jesus, he bought a $6,000 mullet and a computer, now he is bawlin!! you forgot to put that you have limo tint in your sig. Fix that, will ya. We like to know EVERYTHING that you have done to it.
I also have a 3v that will make you think otherwise.
Ahhhhh, he drug me down to his moronic level and beat me with experience.
Curse you Mystic z-28, and your unbeatable, STOCK-ish LS1
Jesus, he bought a $6,000 mullet and a computer, now he is bawlin!! you forgot to put that you have limo tint in your sig. Fix that, will ya. We like to know EVERYTHING that you have done to it.
Lol are we now?
Last edited by Mystic Z-28; 11-28-2010 at 05:28 AM.
11-28-2010, 08:42 AM
#48
I said STOCK 3v's are **** slow. Yours still isn't even that quick for how much work has been done to it. A guy i know made 425 rwhp with just a cam and bolt-ons to his LS1. I'd love to see a silly little 3v do that. I also love how you're trying to ''prove me wrong'' with a car that has nothing to do with my original thread. Go ahead and bring your shitbox mustang down here.
11-28-2010, 09:02 AM
#49
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, stock 3v's are not that fast, no one is arguing that. but you didnt beat one by 7-8 lengths in your auto car in 50mph of acceleration, thats what everyone has an issue with. and yes a 3v wont make the same power mod for mod as an LS1 will. another genious observation. but there are other reasons people buy S197 mustangs. handling, interior, looks, etc...
You don't know what the hell you're talking about, YOU WEREN'T THERE! I used to kill 3v's all the time by several lengths in my GTP when i just had the VS cam, headers, 3.2 pulley and shitty overkill tune. This camaro is definitely faster than that car, with those mods was up top. I'm sorry that my story made your car look bad. Maybe you should justify it by telling me a few more times how a MODDED 3v will take my STOCK camaro lol. And calling it a ''shitbox''.
Last edited by Mystic Z-28; 11-28-2010 at 09:08 AM.
11-28-2010, 09:11 AM
#50
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ravenna, oh
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You stories never make sense. Your camaro at best we established would be a 13.4@105. So if your gtp was slower how in the hell are you pulling 3v's in it by 7 lengths? I think you just tell stories because your car wasn't worthy of beating anything. Seems like everytime you run you beat it by 7 lengths. ***** getting old with you going around being cocky in every thread considering your car is pretty much stock.
11-28-2010, 09:30 AM
#51
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You stories never make sense. Your camaro at best we established would be a 13.4@105. So if your gtp was slower how in the hell are you pulling 3v's in it by 7 lengths? I think you just tell stories because your car wasn't worthy of beating anything. Seems like everytime you run you beat it by 7 lengths. ***** getting old with you going around being cocky in every thread considering your car is pretty much stock.
11-28-2010, 09:37 AM
#52
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ravenna, oh
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you honestly think they are turds then you must think your car is a turd. Just saying based on the times in the ET forum list I pretty much ran the same times as the stock A4's when I was stock. OP if he ran a 14.8 be can't drive it very well so id say you'd get him. Especially with the 4.10s from a dig.
11-28-2010, 09:47 AM
#53
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you honestly think they are turds then you must think your car is a turd. Just saying based on the times in the ET forum list I pretty much ran the same times as the stock A4's when I was stock. OP if he ran a 14.8 be can't drive it very well so id say you'd get him. Especially with the 4.10s from a dig.
11-28-2010, 10:11 AM
#54
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ravenna, oh
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It has to do with you calling a car slow when it's running quarter mile times about the same. I didn't even bring up the 80 roll I could careless what you pull on a car from that speed that's like a roll for a 1500hp supra. Also cars with intakes and catbacks have ran 13.4@105 not even at sea level. I think DA has more to do with one car running better than another. How can you compare those traps to your car you hadn't even ran it. And also what does that have to do with racing 1320ft? All that's showing is powerand you'll win from a roll. Quarter mile is going to show tq, powerband and driver mod. Until you run your car I suggest you stop saying it's trapping 107. So saying a car is slow when it's running the same ets is kinda retarded don't ya think. Again get off your 80 to 130 roll.
11-28-2010, 10:21 AM
#55
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It has to do with you calling a car slow when it's running quarter mile times about the same. I didn't even bring up the 80 roll I could careless what you pull on a car from that speed that's like a roll for a 1500hp supra. Also cars with intakes and catbacks have ran 13.4@105 not even at sea level. I think DA has more to do with one car running better than another. How can you compare those traps to your car you hadn't even ran it. And also what does that have to do with racing 1320ft? All that's showing is powerand you'll win from a roll. Quarter mile is going to show tq, powerband and driver mod. Until you run your car I suggest you stop saying it's trapping 107. So saying a car is slow when it's running the same ets is kinda retarded don't ya think. Again get off your 80 to 130 roll.
11-28-2010, 10:31 AM
#56
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ravenna, oh
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man look at what the OP wants to do a dig. I no where brought any rolls into this you did. No a 3v hasn't to my knowledge run a 12 but, looking at averages you have no room to say there slow. You keep saying roll this and roll that but in this case he wants a dig. So quit talking about roll racing.
11-28-2010, 10:40 AM
#57
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man look at what the OP wants to do a dig. I no where brought any rolls into this you did. No a 3v hasn't to my knowledge run a 12 but, looking at averages you have no room to say there slow. You keep saying roll this and roll that but in this case he wants a dig. So quit talking about roll racing.
11-28-2010, 10:59 AM
#59
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Ravenna, oh
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote me on where I said anything on your 80-130 in this race only after you said something about it. I'm staying on topic with a dig race. My car isn't full bolt on and I've never said I'd put you in your place I don't even have cams. Your car wouldn't even be worth my time unless you had H/C/I and a stall with tires.
11-28-2010, 11:06 AM
#60
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You stories never make sense. Your camaro at best we established would be a 13.4@105. So if your gtp was slower how in the hell are you pulling 3v's in it by 7 lengths? I think you just tell stories because your car wasn't worthy of beating anything. Seems like everytime you run you beat it by 7 lengths. ***** getting old with you going around being cocky in every thread considering your car is pretty much stock.