2010 H/C/75shot SS vs Whipple Lightning
02-08-2011, 09:18 AM
#1
2010 H/C/75shot SS vs Whipple Lightning Couple of buddies.
1badls3: 2010 Camaro SS, M6, 3.73s, ???whp Was told 515 on mustang dyno on old setup (cats, bad clutch, 4.10s).
-Ported heads, cam, FAST, catless 2" kooks w/ full exhaust, UDP, low bottle pressure 75 shot, DRs, full weight.
SVTRyan aka Swine Flu: 2001 Lightning, A4, 3.73s, ???whp 548whp/603wtq on old broken *** trans and stock converter
-Forged 333, Trickflow heads, cams, Whipple 2.3, 3/4 catless LTs w/ full exhaust, 100mm TB/MAF, built A4, 2,800 stall, full weight.
40-140
Wait wut?
40 roll?
Truck doesnt stand a chance...........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qql8SnaWafQ
1badls3: 2010 Camaro SS, M6, 3.73s, ???whp Was told 515 on mustang dyno on old setup (cats, bad clutch, 4.10s).
-Ported heads, cam, FAST, catless 2" kooks w/ full exhaust, UDP, low bottle pressure 75 shot, DRs, full weight.
SVTRyan aka Swine Flu: 2001 Lightning, A4, 3.73s, ???whp 548whp/603wtq on old broken *** trans and stock converter
-Forged 333, Trickflow heads, cams, Whipple 2.3, 3/4 catless LTs w/ full exhaust, 100mm TB/MAF, built A4, 2,800 stall, full weight.
40-140
Wait wut?
40 roll?
Truck doesnt stand a chance...........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qql8SnaWafQ
Last edited by CoolAid; 02-08-2011 at 07:11 PM.
Trending Topics
02-08-2011, 01:41 PM
#8
02-09-2011, 08:47 AM
#14
02-09-2011, 11:43 AM
#15
Yes
No
Im sure you know, but if not, it took TONS of $$$ to make that truck like that. The only Lightnings around here I've heard of being faster are all out gutted race trucks. Swine has that engine bay filled top to bottom with quality, spendy race gear. The trans just got a healthy dose of cash. The kind of cash that builds an iron 408 LS.
Spraying 75 shot although it was supposedly on low bottle pressure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FWIW, the truck trapped 118 on a literally broken trans. Broken drum and other hard parts as well as an 800RPM slip and at least 1.5 second lag into each gear. This video was the first race with the new built trans and Circle D 2,800 stall converter. Its probably trapping 121+ and I wouldnt be surprised for him to tell me it went 125+ or something when he tracks it on Friday which is fast for an A4 in something well over 4,000 pounds.
No
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
FWIW, the truck trapped 118 on a literally broken trans. Broken drum and other hard parts as well as an 800RPM slip and at least 1.5 second lag into each gear. This video was the first race with the new built trans and Circle D 2,800 stall converter. Its probably trapping 121+ and I wouldnt be surprised for him to tell me it went 125+ or something when he tracks it on Friday which is fast for an A4 in something well over 4,000 pounds.
02-09-2011, 03:05 PM
#16
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Race surprised me, although it is 2 heavy pigs racing each other.
That truck is NICE and rolls out!
02-09-2011, 06:26 PM
#17
Teching In
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im sure you know, but if not, it took TONS of $$$ to make that truck like that. The only Lightnings around here I've heard of being faster are all out gutted race trucks. Swine has that engine bay filled top to bottom with quality, spendy race gear. The trans just got a healthy dose of cash. The kind of cash that builds an iron 408 LS.
Originally Posted by marc97taws6
Agreed. They are ugly. The only one I would consider would be a new Z28 but at the price those are going to be, I'd rather buy a used C6 and throw a blower on that
Race surprised me, although it is 2 heavy pigs racing each other.
That truck is NICE and rolls out!
Race surprised me, although it is 2 heavy pigs racing each other.
That truck is NICE and rolls out!
). 
