'11 Mustang V6 vs '99 SS **gopro vids** +2 new vids
#21
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
I was in absolute shock of how the V6 Pony performed the first run. I figured a bit of spinning was a contributing factor. I watched it in 360p (internet traffic Sunday night at 1am sucks here) and it looked okay to me!
Tell your buddy to ditch the LM1 when he decides to do LT's, ORY, and ditch the cats. I love the sound of my LM2 LT1 <3500rpms - but past that and top end... HOLY RASP!
Tell your buddy to ditch the LM1 when he decides to do LT's, ORY, and ditch the cats. I love the sound of my LM2 LT1 <3500rpms - but past that and top end... HOLY RASP!
![Barf](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_barf.gif)
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
As I just posted above you, I forgot to put that both cars had 1 passenger.
#24
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I only got a quick look back because there was a completely trashed/totaled 4th gen Camaro off to the right. Scared my friend who never wears his seatbelt into putting it on that second.
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
edit: nevermind, we cut the video too early to see it. Suffice it to say, it was looking somewhat concave.
#25
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
dunno man got the jump and never had a shot. Id say thats yanked. Not like it held it close until higher speed when more power takes over. Not knocking the v6 stang, it does well for a v6. I just didnt find it impressive like the other guy did. thats all.
#26
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Nashville / Indianapolis
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nice video man! You guys weren't bored were ya? ![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
you are such a hater, you are starting to turn into quite the nut hugger. It did get beat yes but smoked like you stated? Not hardly especially when you take the cars into consideration its a v6 mustang for christ sake vs the god almighty ls1 and loses by 3-4 cars, not bad if you ask me
He would know better than you yes
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
He would know better than you yes
#28
Launching!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenhaven/ South Sacramento 'Burbs
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Nice video man! You guys weren't bored were ya? ![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
you are such a hater, you are starting to turn into quite the nut hugger. It did get beat yes but smoked like you stated? Not hardly especially when you take the cars into consideration its a v6 mustang for christ sake vs the god almighty ls1 and loses by 3-4 cars, not bad if you ask me
He would know better than you yes
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
you are such a hater, you are starting to turn into quite the nut hugger. It did get beat yes but smoked like you stated? Not hardly especially when you take the cars into consideration its a v6 mustang for christ sake vs the god almighty ls1 and loses by 3-4 cars, not bad if you ask me
He would know better than you yes
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
Out of respect for WSsick lets try and keep this thread clean.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
#30
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think people are impressed by the new V6 Stang because we remember the old 3.4's and 3.8's for fbodies and the old 3.8's and 4.0's for the Mustangs which were all comparatively anemic. Some people aren't used to change and are surprised by the progression of modern engines
#31
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A year and a half ago, a V6 Mustang running like that one would be using a power adder to do it... That's significantly different than today and for that reason alone, this V6 is impressive. Seeing a stock one run a 13.7 on the drag strip??? Yeah, we expected that, didn't we???
#32
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In the grand scheme of things, of course not. But I think it was pretty special that today's V6 pony cars are running times that used to be reserved for V8s.
Yeah man, that engine sucked. And the 3.8 was TERRIBLE.
Exactly
I think people are impressed by the new V6 Stang because we remember the old 3.4's and 3.8's for fbodies and the old 3.8's and 4.0's for the Mustangs which were all comparatively anemic. Some people aren't used to change and are surprised by the progression of modern engines
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)
#34
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Liberal land
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The camera angle from the car losing always makes the car count look way worse than the camera from the car in the lead. Nice to see 2 different perspectives.
And LOL @ all of those saying it's not impressive at all. You are comparing fords bottom of the barrel base engine in the mustang to an engine that still today is a force to be reconned with on the street....and with the mods the camaro has he should be right around 330 WHP. I find that pretty damn impressive for the mustang to hang as well as it did.....a car that can be bought for just over $20K brand new.
And LOL @ all of those saying it's not impressive at all. You are comparing fords bottom of the barrel base engine in the mustang to an engine that still today is a force to be reconned with on the street....and with the mods the camaro has he should be right around 330 WHP. I find that pretty damn impressive for the mustang to hang as well as it did.....a car that can be bought for just over $20K brand new.
#36
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rent Free in Hio's Mind
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
30 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Oh, and
![Rotflmao](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/rotflmao.gif)
#37
#38
11 Second Club
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: E-town raceway
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The camera angle from the car losing always makes the car count look way worse than the camera from the car in the lead. Nice to see 2 different perspectives.
And LOL @ all of those saying it's not impressive at all. You are comparing fords bottom of the barrel base engine in the mustang to an engine that still today is a force to be reconned with on the street....and with the mods the camaro has he should be right around 330 WHP. I find that pretty damn impressive for the mustang to hang as well as it did.....a car that can be bought for just over $20K brand new.
And LOL @ all of those saying it's not impressive at all. You are comparing fords bottom of the barrel base engine in the mustang to an engine that still today is a force to be reconned with on the street....and with the mods the camaro has he should be right around 330 WHP. I find that pretty damn impressive for the mustang to hang as well as it did.....a car that can be bought for just over $20K brand new.
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
300-305whp is more realistic.
Nice video man! You guys weren't bored were ya? ![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
you are such a hater, you are starting to turn into quite the nut hugger. It did get beat yes but smoked like you stated? Not hardly especially when you take the cars into consideration its a v6 mustang for christ sake vs the god almighty ls1 and loses by 3-4 cars, not bad if you ask me
He would know better than you yes
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
you are such a hater, you are starting to turn into quite the nut hugger. It did get beat yes but smoked like you stated? Not hardly especially when you take the cars into consideration its a v6 mustang for christ sake vs the god almighty ls1 and loses by 3-4 cars, not bad if you ask me
He would know better than you yes
Starting to turn? It's been a while, now. It's like he has to act like a bullied kid on the playground at all times and can't ever view things objectively. Other people ever giving props to a Ford = a big no no for him.
Oh, and
@ Redfire acting like Sean wouldn't know the distance between the cars better than him.
Oh, and
![Rotflmao](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/rotflmao.gif)
![Nut swinger](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/nutswinger.gif)
Last edited by LT/LS Guy; 04-19-2011 at 10:32 AM.
#40
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just to give some more perspective, it is harder to judge distance because of where the GoPro was located (allllll the way at the back, and low mounted). This was also the reason in the GoPro video, all you hear is the Mustang.
1st pic is from the video (obviously) just to show where exactly it was mounted; 2nd pic is just a pic from before we started taking video, to show another view from the GoPro.
1st pic is from the video (obviously) just to show where exactly it was mounted; 2nd pic is just a pic from before we started taking video, to show another view from the GoPro.