Fun in my Girlfriends Z28: z28 vs 11' CS/GT
06-01-2011, 10:07 AM
#21
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The '11 driver could have sucked, who knows...
06-01-2011, 10:16 AM
#23
The OP has a garage full of slow cars he claims beats faster cars. IMO it either never happened (more than likely) or it was a V6 and he knew he would get laughed off the site so he made up that it was a 5.0 
06-01-2011, 12:14 PM
#29
Teching In
Join Date: May 2009
Location: bourbonnais ill
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be more believable if the OP said the mustang was breaking the tire's lose,missed shift,late start all that would make sense.But to say they were both in it with no issue's and he was pulling is a little far fetched .
06-01-2011, 12:35 PM
#30
Staging Lane
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saying that a stock A4 LS1 with an avg trap of 105 can pull a 5.0 with an avg trap of 110 with the 5.0 getting the hit (and A4s suck from a roll) is not happening.
Anyone who thinks its believable, tell me this. Would you believe if a light bolt on LS1 Z28 raced a Honda S2000 and Z28 got a quick jump, that the S2K would stop his pull and come around him? Of course you wouldnt. But a S2000 traps 100-102. So since thats ludicrous, why isnt this?
I love LSX and have beaten every new 5.0 I've ever raced (3) and even have a thread about one earlier race I had with one. But they were stock and I'm heavily modded (all races were on motor).
Anyone who thinks its believable, tell me this. Would you believe if a light bolt on LS1 Z28 raced a Honda S2000 and Z28 got a quick jump, that the S2K would stop his pull and come around him? Of course you wouldnt. But a S2000 traps 100-102. So since thats ludicrous, why isnt this?
I love LSX and have beaten every new 5.0 I've ever raced (3) and even have a thread about one earlier race I had with one. But they were stock and I'm heavily modded (all races were on motor).
06-01-2011, 01:23 PM
#31
Dealt with two different 2011 5.0 cars. One with 3.55 and one with 3.73 and lighter, both 6 speeds and both well driven.
The 3.55 car I could manage to pull 1.5-2 cars on from a roll with all my stuff in the trunk, but at the time he was running 87 octane.
The 3.73 car I am dead even with from a roll. It traps the same as me at the track on the same days too. Only mod is an axle back exhaust which supposedly does nothing for performance, only sound.
My car is a couple hundred pounds heavier than the average fbody (no more than 300lbs max) but even weight with a 5.0 and a full weight loaded fbody.
Mods in sig.
The 3.55 car I could manage to pull 1.5-2 cars on from a roll with all my stuff in the trunk, but at the time he was running 87 octane.
The 3.73 car I am dead even with from a roll. It traps the same as me at the track on the same days too. Only mod is an axle back exhaust which supposedly does nothing for performance, only sound.
My car is a couple hundred pounds heavier than the average fbody (no more than 300lbs max) but even weight with a 5.0 and a full weight loaded fbody.
Mods in sig.
06-01-2011, 02:13 PM
#33
Staging Lane
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dealt with two different 2011 5.0 cars. One with 3.55 and one with 3.73 and lighter, both 6 speeds and both well driven.
The 3.55 car I could manage to pull 1.5-2 cars on from a roll with all my stuff in the trunk, but at the time he was running 87 octane.
The 3.73 car I am dead even with from a roll. It traps the same as me at the track on the same days too. Only mod is an axle back exhaust which supposedly does nothing for performance, only sound.
My car is a couple hundred pounds heavier than the average fbody (no more than 300lbs max) but even weight with a 5.0 and a full weight loaded fbody.
Mods in sig.
The 3.55 car I could manage to pull 1.5-2 cars on from a roll with all my stuff in the trunk, but at the time he was running 87 octane.
The 3.73 car I am dead even with from a roll. It traps the same as me at the track on the same days too. Only mod is an axle back exhaust which supposedly does nothing for performance, only sound.
My car is a couple hundred pounds heavier than the average fbody (no more than 300lbs max) but even weight with a 5.0 and a full weight loaded fbody.
Mods in sig.
06-01-2011, 02:15 PM
#34
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
13.6@107 (Stock)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvEHZSOsHss
13.35@109 (Stock)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EejfV4KM2Dc
13.4@106 (Stock)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wo-2szvBTE
13.4@107 (Stock)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIr-u7TKXOw
13.79@108 (Exhaust)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJXH9cSaFO4
12.3@110 (Full Bolt Ons, Tune, MT ET Streets)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9M3k9fpqlU
And you guys wonder why stock and light bolt on F-Bodys are running with 5.0's on the street....
With only MT's
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iOpOtxufko
My 100% Bone stock 00 A4 WS6 went 13.25@107.42 on 19's the 2nd day I had it and thats not my best stock time. See what im getting at? On the street its closer then you guys make it seem.
Oh and incase some of you guys forgot I was one of the first f-bodys to run a 5.0 when they came out in my 01 M6 with just a lid and Catback
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odJQAq7l-hI
06-01-2011, 02:23 PM
#35
Staging Lane
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^Those are some good vids. A4s are going to trap slower than the M6's, though for sure. If the OP was in his M6 car, i wouldnt be so quick to jump. But the 5.0 got the hit AND the OP has an auto so it had to electronically downshift...and thats after he got jumped (slightly he says for 2nd race, but it makes a big diff).
With his auto lag and getting jumped hed get initially pulled like you did when the 5.0 cheated like hell on your first run. The auto lag mixed with a quick jump would be ab the same jump as the 5.0 did to you.
With his auto lag and getting jumped hed get initially pulled like you did when the 5.0 cheated like hell on your first run. The auto lag mixed with a quick jump would be ab the same jump as the 5.0 did to you.
06-01-2011, 02:44 PM
#36
Wow you found a bunch of videos of the slowest ones. Here let me return favor.
I could go onto modularfords and pull the two fastest bone stock s that went 12.2 manual and 12.3 auto.
Cold air, tune, x pipe Mt's(my car)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwfAv33Tavg
Tires only(my car)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVexXKJvQ_E
MODS:
Steeda Cold Air Intake, Brenspeed 93 Octane Tune Mickey Thompson ET Street Radials
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9M3k...eature=related
What funny is how every one like ya guy had tune and this and this and this...
Oh and two full bolt ons. White don't even had headers and is auto.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdf5kgINH0A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dhMK...layer_embedded
I could go onto modularfords and pull the two fastest bone stock s that went 12.2 manual and 12.3 auto.
Cold air, tune, x pipe Mt's(my car)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwfAv33Tavg
Tires only(my car)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVexXKJvQ_E
MODS:
Steeda Cold Air Intake, Brenspeed 93 Octane Tune Mickey Thompson ET Street Radials
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9M3k...eature=related
What funny is how every one like ya guy had tune and this and this and this...
Oh and two full bolt ons. White don't even had headers and is auto.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdf5kgINH0A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dhMK...layer_embedded
06-01-2011, 02:51 PM
#37
I'm not calling BS on the OP, just stating some facts.
In 1840 DA the 5.0 and me were both trapping 110-111mph. I was running 12.24 and the 5.0 was getting wheel hop and running 13.2x
Two m6 fbodies the same day with same mods: ls6 intake, TSP 1 7/8 headers, full exhaust (1 duals, 1 LM1), SLP lids, 315 street tires, 1 tuned 1 not.
Tuned fbody: 13.0@109 (giving it hell, 9 in rear)
Untuned fbody: 13.3@108 (leaving light due to 10 bolt)
In 1840 DA the 5.0 and me were both trapping 110-111mph. I was running 12.24 and the 5.0 was getting wheel hop and running 13.2x
Two m6 fbodies the same day with same mods: ls6 intake, TSP 1 7/8 headers, full exhaust (1 duals, 1 LM1), SLP lids, 315 street tires, 1 tuned 1 not.
Tuned fbody: 13.0@109 (giving it hell, 9 in rear)
Untuned fbody: 13.3@108 (leaving light due to 10 bolt)
06-01-2011, 02:54 PM
#38
I also could go on and find plenty video's of 5th gens going high 13s and 14s. As well as f bodies going 14s.
The car op mentioned is bone stock.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sls42t4LcY
The car op mentioned is bone stock.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sls42t4LcY
06-01-2011, 03:01 PM
#39
13.6@107 (Stock)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvEHZSOsHss
Oh and incase some of you guys forgot I was one of the first f-bodys to run a 5.0 when they came out in my 01 M6 with just a lid and Catback
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odJQAq7l-hI
Oh he also traded a 09 SRT8 chally/10 CAMARO SS/10 GT500(wifes) in that order to get his 5.0 and his wife a 2012 Chally RT(it had more room then the GT500).
And since you first one to run a 5.0. That shows that guy didnt even know how to drive his car.
If you are really that stupid and think the 5.0 isn't going mid to low 12s stock you are dumber then I thought.
06-01-2011, 03:16 PM
#40
On The Tree
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So a stock Z28 kept up with and then beat a car with 100hp more....I will throw the 
out there.
Specially after several cammed and bolt on guys said they ran a few and some have lost and some them have won. Either way 90% giving props to the 5.0 and admit it will be a stock F body and 5th gen.
out there. Specially after several cammed and bolt on guys said they ran a few and some have lost and some them have won. Either way 90% giving props to the 5.0 and admit it will be a stock F body and 5th gen.
I take it your in the army if your in Killeen?