Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Trans Am vs Turbo Mustang rematch, CBR 600

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2011, 08:22 PM
  #41  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
NSSANE02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
Come on down, he wasn't on high boost on that pass.
I bet his v-tech wasn't working either... ******* ricer excuses. I'll run him on the track with a bolt-on car, how bout that? I suppose that wouldn't be worthy of him though if he turned up the boost... how about a liter bike?
Old 10-08-2011, 08:37 PM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,942
Received 434 Likes on 341 Posts

Default

^^^lol....sic him...get him......Needs high boost

sw70....this is what I'm telling you. Here is 2 bolt-on cars (although mine is a crate ls6) that would wear out that mustang. That's why I'm sayin there's some reason why your car is'nt accelerating as it should. You can take it as me being a smartass or you can go figure out why your loseing to it.

Last edited by HioSSilver; 10-08-2011 at 08:42 PM.
Old 10-08-2011, 09:15 PM
  #43  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
^^^lol....sic him...get him......Needs high boost

sw70....this is what I'm telling you. Here is 2 bolt-on cars (although mine is a crate ls6) that would wear out that mustang. That's why I'm sayin there's some reason why your car is'nt accelerating as it should. You can take it as me being a smartass or you can go figure out why your loseing to it.
You must be ******* retarded, we're racing from rolls, something the Mustang is much better at. My car would monkey **** it in a 1/4 mile dig, I already stay ahead of him from 20 or 40 to 110 or so.

Come run this Mustang on the highway and try to figure out why you can't beat it.
Old 10-08-2011, 09:28 PM
  #44  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Regardless, roll racing = for both parties the one who asks for it and the one who gives it.
Old 10-08-2011, 09:28 PM
  #45  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
NSSANE02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

You showed a vid of the car running the 1/4, then invited "any cam only f-body to run him". And we're ******* retarded for challenging him in a 1/4 run?
Old 10-08-2011, 09:30 PM
  #46  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
NSSANE02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Besides, that thing better have been on half-boost, or less to be as fast as you say it is. 116... really?
Old 10-08-2011, 09:50 PM
  #47  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

in the last page you specifically invited hios down because he was on low boost then. Hes gonna need more than hi boost and a packed lunch to pick up 11 mph its gonna take to out run hios from any gay roll.his car went 126.4 last night. Now whos the fukin retard.
Old 10-08-2011, 10:04 PM
  #48  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NSSANE02
You showed a vid of the car running the 1/4, then invited "any cam only f-body to run him". And we're ******* retarded for challenging him in a 1/4 run?
My car would ***** it from a dig so it would be a waste of everyones. Were trying to get the mustang a race against a 430 whp fbody and a corvette that goes 12.0@119. You all will just call those turds too lmao.
Old 10-08-2011, 10:15 PM
  #49  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
NSSANE02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sw07gt
My car would ***** it from a dig so it would be a waste of everyones. Were trying to get the mustang a race against a 430 whp fbody and a corvette that goes 12.0@119. You all will just call those turds too lmao.
So why did you even post the 1/4 mi. stuff? And I haven't called anything a turd, but mid 12's @ 116 is not impressive. 12.0 @ 119 isn't really all that impressive either, but it's no turd.
Old 10-08-2011, 11:09 PM
  #50  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I've raced 2 600's. I only have any real info on one, mine. The other was a gsxr I think and I realed him in from behind. I can hand it to my bike pretty good. I have'nt payed much attention to bikes in the past couple years at the track. Don't go quoteing mags either, but if you really want to my fz6 went 11.2 @ 119 by mag times. I've never seen anyone duplicate mag times for bikes unless they were on a 'busa.
I was running 10.9's on a bone stock 600 yesterday at LVD, trapping 126-127. I weigh about 185 with gear on.
Old 10-08-2011, 11:39 PM
  #51  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PewterScreaminMach
I was running 10.9's on a bone stock 600 yesterday at LVD, trapping 126-127. I weigh about 185 with gear on.
These results are typical for a good rider. I ran 10.8's @ 129 in 1300 DA on my 07 Kawi, and weigh about the same with gear (maybe 5-10lbs less). I have more mods but my gearing did more harm then good - stock height, stock wheelbase, and too much gearing so couldn't keep the front down for nothing. Terrible 60's (I have the slips still somewhere). My shifting is perfect but I had little to no experience on a drag strip on a bike. Grew up on dirt and been riding for 13+ years. A better drag racer would run mid-low 10s on the same bike.

A 490rwhp auto will have a hell of a time keeping up with even a stock modern 600 supersport. An FZ6 uses a detuned 2003 R6 engine to be a better commuter, and will not run as hard as a true Supersport will. Amazing bike in its own right - just like Suzuki's SV's and Kawi's non-ZX Ninjas - just not as quick as the race bike versions.
Old 10-08-2011, 11:41 PM
  #52  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,942
Received 434 Likes on 341 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PewterScreaminMach
I was running 10.9's on a bone stock 600 yesterday at LVD, trapping 126-127. I weigh about 185 with gear on.
Nice, good job riding. So when did 126.05 become 127?...lol I seen your post in the results section. I posted a vid there of me running last night. It would be a good run. I have a bit more mph and I have'nt run a 10.9 yet but I have run 11.1.
Old 10-08-2011, 11:44 PM
  #53  
TECH Addict
 
It'llrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NSSANE02
So why did you even post the 1/4 mi. stuff? And I haven't called anything a turd, but mid 12's @ 116 is not impressive. 12.0 @ 119 isn't really all that impressive either, but it's no turd.
He posted that to show the mph, from the looks. He began the thread specifically about roll racing and was simply trying to show that it's MUCH better from a roll than a dig and that even as a 2v, it's got some top end charge.

As for the bike stuff on the 1/4 mile... That's totally different than from a roll. Bikes don't often launch at full power(unless they have a wheelie bar or extended swingarm). From just 25 or so, full power can be applied to a 600 and it's GONNA hual *** with any kind of rider aboard.
Old 10-09-2011, 12:43 AM
  #54  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Pulled a couple cars on an r6 with a bad rider tonight.
Old 10-09-2011, 02:34 AM
  #55  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by It'llrun
He posted that to show the mph, from the looks. He began the thread specifically about roll racing and was simply trying to show that it's MUCH better from a roll than a dig and that even as a 2v, it's got some top end charge.
This. I mean did you all even watch the videos of us racing? It's not until around 110 that he even starts pulling. The point I was trying to prove is 1) The car is not as slow as some people like to think it is and 2) that even in the worst possible race for it (1/4 dig) it can put up a decent mph. Also in case anyone was wondering I believe it was a 2.2 60ft on that pass.
Old 10-09-2011, 07:34 AM
  #56  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,942
Received 434 Likes on 341 Posts

Default

That is a good running 2v, there is no doubt about that. I think you should be able to run with him. By those vids you would be hard pressed to keep up from a dig. It kinda looks like yours is laying over a bit at higher speed or it's not hitting the right cells under load to let it accelerate. Does your car rev lazily under no load? I have seen cam cars do that...if so then there is alot left in it. Maybe your exhaust does'nt agree with your combo. Maybe the weight of your car is holding you back that much. It don't sound like your turning it very hard either.
Old 10-09-2011, 10:32 AM
  #57  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

I would have a hard time keeping up from a dig? I hope you meant he would. My car is not falling off on top, his is just coming on strong. The car weighs 3820 with me in it and it's being shifted at 6700.
Old 10-09-2011, 10:51 AM
  #58  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
PewterScreaminMach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Nice, good job riding. So when did 126.05 become 127?...lol I seen your post in the results section. I posted a vid there of me running last night. It would be a good run. I have a bit more mph and I have'nt run a 10.9 yet but I have run 11.1.
Don't be naive, I know you're into this sport enough to realize that your best ET pass isn't always your best MPH. Here's a run where I was messing with launch RPM and bogged the **** out of it.


Last edited by PewterScreaminMach; 10-09-2011 at 11:07 AM.
Old 10-09-2011, 11:29 AM
  #59  
Teching In
 
Sleep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Was that a corvette that passed you and the mustang in the first vid?
Old 10-09-2011, 11:31 AM
  #60  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Sleep
Was that a corvette that passed you and the mustang in the first vid?
Yea lol, I was wondering if anyone would notice that. It's a supercharged vette making almost 700 whp with 14x,xxx miles on a bone stock motor.


Quick Reply: Trans Am vs Turbo Mustang rematch, CBR 600



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 AM.