What's so challenging about a Challenger? Cross off yet another Dodge
10-20-2011 | 10:36 AM
#221
TECH Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
I'm not going to do your research for you. Quoting 1 post from 2008 means nothing. At least you read the stickies I guess.
Last time we had a discussion you proved that you really do not research things thoroughly. I'm done with this conversation
Last time we had a discussion you proved that you really do not research things thoroughly. I'm done with this conversation
10-20-2011 | 11:02 AM
#222
theres more than 1! last time u proved you cant read a gear chart lol! If you had ever owned a termi at any time you could comment! that was real world situation data loged! You have no proof like i provided thats while your bailing out! like another guy on heres sig says when in doubt 
Last edited by 92cobranotch; 10-20-2011 at 11:23 AM.
10-20-2011 | 11:45 AM
#223
last one stoppy and my point is proved, promise ill try not 2 **** up your thread after this.............................................. ..Unlike your car, I'm running a CAI in a supercharged Cobra, and the ecu will pull timing at wot if down-stream iat's surpass 150ish, I converted my mac RAI to a fenderwell unit with two 4" 90s and 2 pieces of 4" aluminum pipe and decreased my upstream iat's by a large margin and therefore my "downstream" iat's or "after blower" iat's had a much lower starting temperature prior to a full 1/4 mile run. I tested the CAI on a warmer day than the RAI and still decreased my upstream iat's by almost 50 degrees.
I did not confirm this on a dyno, but it did three proven, beneficial things for me.
1. it allowed me to run a more agressive pulley combo allowing more boost without iat's climbing high enough to pull timing.
2. my 1st run out, I ran my quickest et according to my G-tech pro by a over tenth, and also equalled my best trap speed recorded.
3. gave me piece of mind by not having my expensive engine injesting 160+ degree air under 14-15 psi of boost, staving possible detonation.
The kicker here though, is your iat's will never reach these high temps of a supercharged engine, and I doubt a N/A car's computer has the capability to pull timing and "really" turn down your power.....................http://www.modularfords.com/forums/f...............go lay in the corner bitch 88 until spoken to!!!!!
I did not confirm this on a dyno, but it did three proven, beneficial things for me.
1. it allowed me to run a more agressive pulley combo allowing more boost without iat's climbing high enough to pull timing.
2. my 1st run out, I ran my quickest et according to my G-tech pro by a over tenth, and also equalled my best trap speed recorded.
3. gave me piece of mind by not having my expensive engine injesting 160+ degree air under 14-15 psi of boost, staving possible detonation.
The kicker here though, is your iat's will never reach these high temps of a supercharged engine, and I doubt a N/A car's computer has the capability to pull timing and "really" turn down your power.....................http://www.modularfords.com/forums/f...............go lay in the corner bitch 88 until spoken to!!!!!
10-20-2011 | 12:41 PM
#226
88 gt you ******* dipshit lol.... show me dyno pulls where the cai drops power. my intake set up draws air at the botom of the bumper instead of the hot bay! you show me back to back dynos with no changes but the cai on a eaton and show me the ******* power loss. not to mention stopsign said in his opinion and thats it his opinion.
10-20-2011 | 12:43 PM
#227
I can add to the JLT comments. Yes the JLT will make more power in real world circumstances. A dyno is one thing. An under the hood filter has higher IAT1's and IAT2's. I've datalogged on the street with a 9"-12" open and a 12" JLT in the Fender. Same day back to back. The 9" filter on said application would have IAT1's in the 110's and IAT2's would hit 200*plus. The 12" help some IAT1's in the 105*range and IAT2's would hit the high 170*-185* range. Then the 12" JLT in the Fender would have IAT1's in the mid 90*s and IAT2's were in the 145-150* range. Also on my 9 sec car with the JLT in 95* air and about 4000ft DA when I use my Ice box on a 1/4 mile pass my IAT2's hit a max of 133* on 28psi of boost. Under the hood would be cooking!
.................................................. .................................................. .......http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ts-thread.html .................................................. .............need i say anymore?
.................................................. .................................................. .......http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ts-thread.html .................................................. .............need i say anymore?
10-20-2011 | 01:07 PM
#231
10-20-2011 | 05:13 PM
#234
Teching In
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: NY
I watched a stock 392 challenger run 12.4's at 116 back to back to back to back the other day. In pretty good DA, Wont deny that. Watched a new CTS-V With about 300 miles on it go 12.2 at 118 also. I was suprised they were in the same region but i guess it makes sense. I dont know for sure but, I dont think bolt on mach 1's run that area of MPH etc. Id love to see the race for ya.
10-20-2011 | 05:22 PM
#235
No I don't plan on being anywhere close to 116-118mph. 
Would be nice though! 12.4 is getting it with a stock car, that's for sure. I don't think they all run that though. Hell even if I lose I have a smaller motor, less power, older car.... 
Since I'm a 5 speed I would love to run a manual 392.
Would be nice though! 12.4 is getting it with a stock car, that's for sure. I don't think they all run that though. Hell even if I lose I have a smaller motor, less power, older car.... Since I'm a 5 speed I would love to run a manual 392.
10-20-2011 | 06:34 PM
#236
Teching In
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: bourbonnais ill
No I don't plan on being anywhere close to 116-118mph. Would be nice though! 12.4 is getting it with a stock car, that's for sure. I don't think they all run that though. HELL EVEN IF I LOSE I HAVE A SMALLER MOTOR, LESS POWER, OLDER CAR....
Since I'm a 5 speed I would love to run a manual 392.
Would be nice though! 12.4 is getting it with a stock car, that's for sure. I don't think they all run that though. HELL EVEN IF I LOSE I HAVE A SMALLER MOTOR, LESS POWER, OLDER CAR.... Since I'm a 5 speed I would love to run a manual 392.
10-20-2011 | 07:07 PM
#237
Teching In
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina
I am confused...why are all the heavily modified cars (LS1s or Mopar) trying to run Stopsign's minimal bolt-on MACH.
Stopsign, you either have to run less modified cars or you have to add some **** on you MACH...You are killing yourself by running faster cars all the time.
Stopsign, you either have to run less modified cars or you have to add some **** on you MACH...You are killing yourself by running faster cars all the time.
10-20-2011 | 07:37 PM
#238
I am confused...why are all the heavily modified cars (LS1s or Mopar) trying to run Stopsign's minimal bolt-on MACH.
Stopsign, you either have to run less modified cars or you have to add some **** on you MACH...You are killing yourself by running faster cars all the time.
Stopsign, you either have to run less modified cars or you have to add some **** on you MACH...You are killing yourself by running faster cars all the time.
I think I'm making a new personal rule...No more running anyone at a roll faster than say...30mph. Dig is preferred
10-20-2011 | 09:11 PM
#239
I just read ALL....12....*******....PAGES. And now I'm tired, cranky, found out cold air intakes don't work, learned that dodge challengers run between a 13.8 and 12.4 stock, that chargers have chilled cup holders, and last but not least, that stopsign doesn't drive an acura anymore.
Whew, I'm beat. I'm going to bed now.
Whew, I'm beat. I'm going to bed now.