Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2012 Charger SRT8 vs 2011 5.0 and Whipple 07 GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2011, 06:51 PM
  #201  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
I had no idea we were talking a 400rwhp car against a sub 300rwhp car. I'm done with this.
with the weight difference alone stoppy it equals out alot. Dont laugh to hard, you have to look at the entire picture your car weighs 3400ish his has to be 1000 heavier. Thus explains high hp lower et
Old 11-15-2011, 07:01 PM
  #202  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a race with a Mach 1 and a 2010 Full bolt on GT from SVTP but they never got back to me. So will have to just find one at irwindale
Old 11-15-2011, 07:02 PM
  #203  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
with the weight difference alone stoppy it equals out alot. Dont laugh to hard, you have to look at the entire picture your car weighs 3400ish his has to be 1000 heavier. Thus explains high hp lower et
Oh ok, so now we have...

My car weighs less
I have gears
I launch too hard
I have sticky tires
My rear wheels aren't stock size

What else am I missing that should be in the excuse pile?
Old 11-15-2011, 07:15 PM
  #204  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Oh ok, so now we have...

My car weighs less
I have gears
I launch too hard
I have sticky tires
My rear wheels aren't stock size

What else am I missing that should be in the excuse pile?
get your head out of your ***! I said nothing about your times! In fact didnt I predict them within a .1? I was sayin dont laugh at a peak number and his e.t. look at the whole pic. Thats what a land yought with 400 hp should run. You two should be a good run from dig
Old 11-15-2011, 07:20 PM
  #205  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
Oh ok, so now we have...

My car weighs less
I have gears
I launch too hard
I have sticky tires
My rear wheels aren't stock size

What else am I missing that should be in the excuse pile?
Whats your excuse why 6.1 and 6.4 SRT8s are running faster times then you with less mods?
Old 11-15-2011, 07:20 PM
  #206  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Where did I say anything about my times?
Old 11-15-2011, 07:26 PM
  #207  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You said many times earlier that those were excuses as to why your car ran what it did. Then you took my unrelated ccomment and threw it in that bs. You know as well as I do mopar sucks but this one in question would give you a good run
Old 11-15-2011, 07:28 PM
  #208  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
You said many times earlier that those were excuses as to why your car ran what it did. Then you took my unrelated ccomment and threw it in that bs. You know as well as I do mopar sucks but this one in question would give you a good run
That's alot of twisting and turning there.
Old 11-15-2011, 07:29 PM
  #209  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
You said many times earlier that those were excuses as to why your car ran what it did. Then you took my unrelated ccomment and threw it in that bs. You know as well as I do mopar sucks but this one in question would give you a good run
Making your buyers pay 50K for a car and not letting them tune it. Alot of mopar fans feel the same way
Old 11-15-2011, 07:30 PM
  #210  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Whats your excuse why 6.1 and 6.4 SRT8s are running faster times then you with less mods?
I don't have a single excuse. I'd love to run one in person and see what happens.
Old 11-15-2011, 07:35 PM
  #211  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Making your buyers pay 50K for a car and not letting them tune it. Alot of mopar fans feel the same way
uncracked ecus and them putting a engine that makes good power in such a heavy chassis. But they have done the same dumb **** since the heavy 60s cars. And stopy you foolowed it so must not have been so twisty turny lol
Old 11-15-2011, 07:59 PM
  #212  
Teching In
 
Bloodykisses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 92cobranotch
uncracked ecus and them putting a engine that makes good power in such a heavy chassis. But they have done the same dumb **** since the heavy 60s cars. And stopy you foolowed it so must not have been so twisty turny lol
They put a powerfull engine in a full size car with every option and can still keep up with the 5.0's, beat the SS and do mid 12's. Not a rat trap. Theres a lot of people that wish theyd make a scaled down, no power windows or seats, cheap light leather seats, etc challenger to lower the weight a bunch and their smart *** answer to that has been "buy a drag pak". But theres rumors on an ACR challenger being made with a 6.4 engine in pretty much base model challenger and sub 3800 lbs. Should be intetesting.
Old 11-15-2011, 08:01 PM
  #213  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Although the Dodge srt8 looks better than it used to, it's still the same old over priced 20 inch rim candidate its always been. The Camaro and the Stang are better looking and are cheaper in price and to mod than the Dodge.
Old 11-15-2011, 08:04 PM
  #214  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kennyxg
Although the Dodge srt8 looks better than it used to, it's still the same old over priced 20 inch rim candidate its always been. The Camaro and the Stang are better looking and are cheaper in price and to mod than the Dodge.
Thats all an opinion, I would never look twice at any 5.0. The Challenger, Charger, 300 and Camaro are all better looking then the 5.0 IMO. And I wouldn't say its over priced these cars have just about every feature one could ever want in a all around enjoyable car.
Old 11-15-2011, 08:10 PM
  #215  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
kennyxg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NiteRiderWS6
Thats all an opinion, I would never look twice at any 5.0. The Challenger, Charger, 300 and Camaro are all better looking then the 5.0 IMO. And I wouldn't say its over priced these cars have just about every feature one could ever want in a all around enjoyable car.
Your car is nice, don't get me the wrong way. But a four door? it would make me feel 10 years older lol! Challengers are a different story i like those cars alot, just not willing to sell my house for one. 5.0 spanks them all mod for mod...
Old 11-15-2011, 08:13 PM
  #216  
Teching In
 
Bloodykisses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was sitting in my RT tonight outside of work and 2 dudes got out of a new 5.0 and walked by and said "i dont care if its 4 doors, this cars still ******* hot". I started it up and said, "it goes too". Talked to them for a few and found out the dude with the 5.0 just ordered a blower for his, or so he says, for over the winter. I never expect people to say stuff about my car because it looks 100% stock but, some people do like them a lot.
Old 11-15-2011, 08:20 PM
  #217  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kennyxg
Your car is nice, don't get me the wrong way. But a four door? it would make me feel 10 years older lol! Challengers are a different story i like those cars alot, just not willing to sell my house for one. 5.0 spanks them all mod for mod...
I wouldnt go that far, the 392's fastest stock time is faster then the 5.0, there isn't any tuning out right now for the 392. Once we see what full bolt ons and a tune does thats still up in the air. Keep in mind the 392 was detuned to 470hp from 525hp because of emissions. There will be big gains with a tune and CAI. Back when the 6.1 came out Livernois gained 35+rwhp with just a tune and CAI.
Old 11-15-2011, 08:21 PM
  #218  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Stopsign32v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bloodykisses
I was sitting in my RT tonight outside of work and 2 dudes got out of a new 5.0 and walked by and said "i dont care if its 4 doors, this cars still ******* hot". I started it up and said, "it goes too". Talked to them for a few and found out the dude with the 5.0 just ordered a blower for his, or so he says, for over the winter. I never expect people to say stuff about my car because it looks 100% stock but, some people do like them a lot.
I ran a RT from a roll a couple weeks back and he put up less of a fight than the 2v GT I ran. Those cars do not impress me at all. Hopefully there is some special secret mod that adds 80rwhp to them.
Old 11-15-2011, 08:24 PM
  #219  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NiteRiderWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kennyxg
Your car is nice, don't get me the wrong way. But a four door? it would make me feel 10 years older lol! Challengers are a different story i like those cars alot, just not willing to sell my house for one. 5.0 spanks them all mod for mod...
Funny you said that because I said those exact words in a convo with my dad about a week ago. The fact that a used Z06 with less then 20K miles can be had for under 40K its a hard decision for me on what I will go with this time. Not to mention SRT10 vipers are in the same price.
Old 11-15-2011, 08:26 PM
  #220  
Teching In
iTrader: (9)
 
92cobranotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stopsign32v
I ran a RT from a roll a couple weeks back and he put up less of a fight than the 2v GT I ran. Those cars do not impress me at all. Hopefully there is some special secret mod that adds 80rwhp to them.
pi 2v?


Quick Reply: 2012 Charger SRT8 vs 2011 5.0 and Whipple 07 GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.