2012 Charger SRT8 vs 2011 5.0 and Whipple 07 GT
#461
#463
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To give you an idea 8.50@88 KB Mach 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4_bt-OPEvA
Another KB Mach 1 7.97@89
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RaV46pdS_4
Mach 1 with 4.10 gears, magnaflow exhaust, tune, drag radials 8.5@82
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLiEl37GKcE
Last edited by NiteRiderWS6; 11-24-2011 at 08:52 PM.
#466
They are no where near into the 7's in CA or at our track so I dont care what they run on east coast tracks in perfect conditions.
To give you an idea 8.50@88 KB Mach 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4_bt-OPEvA
Another KB Mach 1 7.97@89
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RaV46pdS_4
Mach 1 with 4.10 gears, magnaflow exhaust, tune, drag radials 8.5@82
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLiEl37GKcE
To give you an idea 8.50@88 KB Mach 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4_bt-OPEvA
Another KB Mach 1 7.97@89
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RaV46pdS_4
Mach 1 with 4.10 gears, magnaflow exhaust, tune, drag radials 8.5@82
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLiEl37GKcE
Last edited by automach1; 11-24-2011 at 09:14 PM.
#467
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its irwindale and +350 at 5 today, I didnt run in good weather like this it was only around 60 there today. When I ran 8.2 it was around 89 during summer and the DA was +2000. Like I said it dosent matter what they run anywhere else it matters what they are running in your state. I have wasted enough full bolt on Mach 1's to know how they run , unless your telling me bolt on Mach 1's are faster then bolt on 5.0's
Me vs Full bolt on / Tuned / DR / 6-Speed 5.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebw4YPxgO7o
Me vs Stock GT500
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsqacI4KhJY
you do the math on where a bolt on mach 1 would fall in this equation....
Me vs Full bolt on / Tuned / DR / 6-Speed 5.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebw4YPxgO7o
Me vs Stock GT500
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsqacI4KhJY
you do the math on where a bolt on mach 1 would fall in this equation....
#468
its irwindale and +350 at 5 today, I didnt run in good weather like this it was only around 60 there today. When I ran 8.2 it was around 89 during summer and the DA was +2000. Like I said it dosent matter what they run anywhere else it matters what they are running in your state. I have wasted enough full bolt on Mach 1's to know how they run
Last edited by automach1; 11-24-2011 at 09:29 PM.
#469
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
lol its more of a fact. Almost every new 392 owner is reporting faster times after the break in period. When I test drove a 392 with 11 miles on it I said it felt slow and sluggish. I then drove one with 4,600 miles on it and there was a big difference trust me. And you say slowpar but if you consider 12.3-12.5 slow for a 4000+lb car then I feel sorry for you.
12s are slow period, no matter what they are. Quick for a stock car, but with all that power, even with it being a tank, I'm just not overly impressed by it. Sorry I don't bow down to the slowpars like you, I do like them though.
Those 6.1s are turds for sure though. My car when it was stock ran next to an SRT8 Charger and pulled a nose on it when he even got the hit.
#470
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's plenty of variables when talking about track times. The gains could be from experience, DA, better track prep, etc. I'd love to see a dyno of one with next to no miles on it, run it on the dyno for a few hours to break it in and see what it goes. I would stick my finger up my own ******* if it came out over 20hp...I'd say maybe a nice 5-8, 10 tops.
12s are slow period, no matter what they are. Quick for a stock car, but with all that power, even with it being a tank, I'm just not overly impressed by it. Sorry I don't bow down to the slowpars like you, I do like them though.
Those 6.1s are turds for sure though. My car when it was stock ran next to an SRT8 Charger and pulled a nose on it when he even got the hit.
12s are slow period, no matter what they are. Quick for a stock car, but with all that power, even with it being a tank, I'm just not overly impressed by it. Sorry I don't bow down to the slowpars like you, I do like them though.
Those 6.1s are turds for sure though. My car when it was stock ran next to an SRT8 Charger and pulled a nose on it when he even got the hit.
#471
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
its easy to talk behind a computer and say what you would be. Your not running at the top of anything here. Bottom line is im 7-0 against mach 1's and 2-4 to 5.0's so Ill keep my oversized turd and beat stock 5.0's and stomp mach's with $400 worth of mods
#472
I have a 7.97 timesplip.. Car broke around the 400ft mark with bolt-ons and in positive da if you want too see it ........ That's fine I will keep skull draging all the delusional srt8 owners like yourself
#473
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Socal
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Delusional is what you are if you think there is no N/A 6.1's that would make you look stupid. The look on the stang owners face when they get beat by a lightly modded charger on 22's from a dig is priceless. After every defeat the first thing they say "is it supercharged".....no its just a 6.1 with a tune/cai sorry the internet has you thinking we run 14s
#474
#477
#479